I don't know why they don't eat cats insted
Dogs = Cat food.I don't know why they don't eat cats insted
I made my statement, you've made yours. You're still a demented monster at the end of the day. Goodbye.
Morality is a completely different topic worth its own thread. It is highly subjective it self. Cooking alive of dogs is a rare one even in the festival, it's a special kind of cuisine said to "bring a better and richer flavour" only a few people afford.
Secondly 90% of plebs in this argument uses an excuse of "inhumane methods" and "most dogs are stolen" to massage the fact that they are not comfortable with someone eating a dog. Meanwhile while seafood gets boiled alive in the name of exotic cuisine and you throw excuses of more complex emotional structure? Sharks are top notch in evolution yet you give 0 f*cks about them being skinned alive and boiled in pans. How many innocent non edible fish are caught in net fishing?
I hate this dog eating, it's disgusting to cook an alive thing, I can never bring my self to watch a dog being cooked alive but this IS NOT ABOUT ME or my sentimental ideals, it's about someone else choosing his diet. Something West has never taught them selves since the missionaries who changed anything into their way of thinking. AND YES YOU ARE A PLEB IF YOU WILL BELITTLE INDIAN'S WAY OF LOOKING AT A COW YET YOU NAMED A DOG MAN'S BEST FRIEND :|
It is actually the opposite. You are taking my own statements and writing it in different way like that would make sense. The point of animals can not think for themselves is that animals don't have society or culture or part of a a society. An animal cannot enforce its will like a human human can do on environment. Most of the things don't have any value in sense but it does for humans like concept of justice, but it is not something actually exists but it matters for humans. Also things here are addressed in humans perspective.You don't seem to be picking up what I'm putting down. Humans can find certain attributes within the world of humans, but human hold no more value to any animal within the natural world, or the universe. You say "we can measure value based on some attributes", but only humans find those attributes valuable. Just like big antlers on a deer is a valuable attribute to other deer, in no way is it of any value to a human nor does it hold any greater value within the universe.
introducing foreign animal species, and global warming. Humans did not bring upon the salvation of animals, but the destruction. Organizations like the WWF (World Wildlife Foundation) only exist to correct the damage humans have caused.
You also make the point that animals cannot think for themselves in a way to devalue them and that they're only alive by the mercy of humans, which is false.
>animals are not alive by mercy of humanHumans are the root source of nearly all animal extinctions, whether it be destroying their habitat via pollution, or deforestation, excessive hunting which creates imbalances in preexisting ecosystems
That's disgusting. Eating Dogs, Cats, Mice, Horse, that's just wrong man. But who am I to judge since I once ate Sheep liver :/
Holy ****, the first paragraph has way too many grammatical errors for me to truly respond without misinterpreting your points; if you don't want me to paraphrase your comments, make them more understandable.It is actually the opposite. You are taking my own statements and writing it in different way like that would make sense. The point of animals can not think for themselves is that animals don't have society or culture or part of a a society. An animal cannot enforce its will like a human human can do on environment. Most of the things don't have any value in sense but it does for humans like concept of justice, but it is not something actually exists but it matters for humans. Also things here are addressed in humans perspective.
I do not disagree with this, nor was I debating this. I'm speaking from the perspective of ethics which does play a role in why humans conserve animals. Of course there are the ecological benifits from ex. keeping bees alive, but then there are animals such as the polar bear, that exist outside of the effects of human survival, and are yet the main focuses of animal conservation organizations.>animals are not alive by mercy of human
>you see animals are getting extinct by ppl
XD
you are clearly just trolling at this point and it is lame as ****
We conserver animals for our own safety and well being and because the ecosystem is necessary for our survival. If there was another way they would not matter. Humans consider their survival top priority and also the immediate profit they can gain, that means from what can human can get from those animals like eating or skinning them for trade.
If I say dogs are raised to be live stock how is your argument more correct than mine?Strongly oppose the festival myself. Dogs are raised as companions, not livestock. That's the difference between them and a pig, chicken or a cow. Even if you are going to hold dogs just for food, do so in actual humane conditions, which is definitely not the conditions the dogs go through.
Some people raise rabbits ducks and fishes as companions. And eat them too. In most countries where they eat dog- they are not usually keeping them as pets. Not that commonly or in a traditional way at least.Strongly oppose the festival myself. Dogs are raised as companions, not livestock. That's the difference between them and a pig, chicken or a cow. Even if you are going to hold dogs just for food, do so in actual humane conditions, which is definitely not the conditions the dogs go through.
Cow is a domestic animal. People eat them all the time.Flim said:no domesticated animal should be eaten,
> You eat sheepI made my statement, you've made yours. You're still a demented monster at the end of the day. Goodbye.