This alone shows your how narrow your mind is when determine the difficulty. It doesn't matter if it's one-sided, what matters is how much from Sabo does it take to defeat Burgess. If it takes more than a few hits while Sabo is half-trying, then it is by default higher than low diff.
I have a shitty scale, and yet your scale says that if one character takes an entire week to defeat another, it's low-diff as long as they aren't hurt in any way.
No being able to take one or tow attacks when he wasn't serious doesn't mean Sabo needs to exert himsef, Burgess wasn't even flat out tanking them he was just a pucnhing bag. You said he woudl contiue to take them which isn't true.
The first one doesn't matter when it takes Sabo 10 mins of at least half-serious effort to render Burgess incapable of continuing battle. Low diff is one or two moves with minimal attention.
Yea according to your scale. For me for a one sided beatdown to push past low diff it would need to be at least a few hours long. If it takes the strongest attacks to take the opponent down then the difficulty might climb, but if its only half trying for that long then that's all.
Hence why your scale is retarded. If Sabo takes ten years to push Burgess to the point of defeat, but receives not a single scratch, it's low-diff, right?
A few hours? Luffy and Doflamingo virtually ended at 50 mins for extreme diff, and that's them clobbering each other. But it needs to be hours where only one person is exerting themselves for it to MAYBE be higher than low diff? Weak.
A few hours of half assing and the opponent unable to tank anything, dodge anything, taking constant damage from every attack thrown. Where the only reason the fight is still going on is because the one doing the asswhooping hasn't fully committed himself to the fight? In a verse where people can fight multiple days nonstop? Yeah.
What makes you think Marco will do much difference? He may have one of the best defences but he hasn't shown any major offence skill. Unlike Sabo who shit stomped Burgess with his Haki.
Sabo was testing a DF. You saw in the collesium he farted on Burgess when using his own abilities. He also tested it against Issho.
Farted on Burgess? I saw them clashing and neither really losing the clash. Unless you have a panel I'm not remembering.
They showed in MF the ONLY way you can beat Marco is to stop his DF, that means no haki wins. Seastone or BB's Fruit are required to beat Marco. As long as his DF is active he will heal.
If Luffy/Doffy took 50 mins then there's no way Sabo took hours with Burgess. Hours is being generous to Burgess in the estimation seeing as Sabo/Burgess started after Luffy/Doffy and ended before Luffy/Doffy. So if L/D is 50 minutes S/B was 30mins or under realistically. Then again this is a work of fiction so realistically gets thrown out of the ****** window.
I didn't say Sabo vs Burgess took hours.
It's not about time either. A person can purposefully stand there for three days, then knock their opponent once, and knock them out. It's the fact that Sabo was continuously attacking Burgess during this period of time that matters.
Because I started the convo from here:
I brought up the Sabo diff. because it sounded like you were implying Sabo's fight should be around Luffy's fight on a diff. scale.
Again your logic skills = 0. Marco was shown healing once, you put a "always". 2ndly Akainu blasted through Marco and left him with bloody nose and tired, something he didn't recover from. What's stopping Sabo from pushing him to those limits? :|
This is out of the way... Burgess was neg diffed
