[Discussion] Law vs Zoro

Who?

  • Zoro

    Votes: 8 33.3%
  • Law

    Votes: 16 66.7%

  • Total voters
    24

bajram

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Jul 20, 2011
Messages
3,120
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️

Pica can solo every enemy at dressrosa according to what Oda wrote a few chapters ago. Vergo never received that level of hype from Oda.Same writer made Pica claim that Zoro can't cut him even after witnessing what Zoro has done to his golem which means that Oda was hinting that he was no 3rd rated haki user.
Crocodile implied he can defeat WB even though he couldnt beat pre-gears luffy? Im supposed to take it seriously or something? If someone like fujitora would set his eyes at pica then the guy would be dragged in the bottom of the sea without leaving a single trace behind. Leave hype aside the way vergo was treated by Oda during PH is something the executives would only dream of, apperantely pica has no panel that he was able to hit zoro, not even once.

OT: Law would win high diff in a fight against zoro, I dont think law will ever be qualified as complete swordsman, he actually uses a sword just to be able to throw attacks and sword style fighting isnt his only way of fighting, he fights with hands too, such as 'mes' or other attacks.
 

Punk Hazard

Active member
Immortal
Joined
Apr 21, 2011
Messages
59,542
Kin
1,661💸
Kumi
11,569💴
Trait Points
50⚔️

They didn't happened because of plot and the same reason can be applied to Zoro vs Law. Law didn't do that coz that's how writer planned his ability to work so I have no reason to go beyond what writer planned for him. After all it's his own manga.

Last time I checked Smoker never really did something like that. Law has plenty of time to do so but he didn't which would go against your point. And if Smoker can attack him without giving a chance to use Shambles then so can Zoro.

No it doesn't. Plot limitations don't apply to versus matches. And the bolded is just incorrect, Law has shown the ability to teleport things on a someone's person or things someone was holding before.
 

A v i

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Messages
4,396
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
No it doesn't. Plot limitations don't apply to versus matches. And the bolded is just incorrect, Law has shown the ability to teleport things on a someone's person or things someone was holding before.

I am aware of each and every point you are posting. You know that those useless VS rules were created by people like us and the author don't give a *** about them right? Which is more legit? Rules that were created by fans or the limitations that were set by the author? I have no reason to follow my own fanfics when manga totally opposes my logic.
 

Punk Hazard

Active member
Immortal
Joined
Apr 21, 2011
Messages
59,542
Kin
1,661💸
Kumi
11,569💴
Trait Points
50⚔️

I am aware of each and every point you are posting. You know that those useless VS rules were created by people like us and the author don't give a *** about them right? Which is more legit? Rules that were created by fans or the limitations that were set by the author? I have no reason to follow my own fanfics when manga totally opposes my logic.
Saving this quote for the next time you participate in VS matches involved with dead people. The next time you're about to post in a thread involving Whitebeard or Roger, or prime Rayleigh, or Prime Garp, just remember this: That because of the limitations set by Oda, either that they're dead and/or will never return to their prime, then it therefore it makes no sense to post in the thread. Otherwise, this post is the dumbest you will ever make.

If you don't like the general, unspoken rules us fans have generally agreed upon for our discussions, then forget about posting in the threads.
 

Bogard

Active member
Supreme
Joined
Apr 7, 2012
Messages
21,914
Kin
8💸
Kumi
3💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
It's a stupid comment. Law sliced a meteorite with relative ease & you should already know what he did to Vergo and the factory/mountains with one swipe. Law's DC is scary.
When you possess a devil fruit that ignores durability compared to someone actually cutting something with his raw physical strength and swordsmanship, i find the latter deserves more credit, so no it's not a stupid comment, especially in these case where the difference in their feats is minimal(the feats are actually not far off from each other). The meteorite actually had a small AOE. Law's Punk Hazard feat remains his best to date and actually there were no real "mountains" in Punk Hazard(when we look at the flashback). The "mountains" we were seeing were just the result of Kuzan's freezing ability, creating cones of ice. And ice is easier to cut than rock, so it would require far less energy in a grand scale
 

Hexuze

Active member
Supreme
Joined
May 19, 2011
Messages
20,359
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
When you possess a devil fruit that ignores durability compared to someone actually cutting something with his raw physical strength and swordsmanship, i find the latter deserves more credit, so no it's not a stupid comment, especially in these case where the difference in their feats is minimal(the feats are actually not far off from each other). The meteorite actually had a small AOE. Law's Punk Hazard feat remains his best to date and actually there were no real "mountains" in Punk Hazard(when we look at the flashback). The "mountains" we were seeing were just the result of Kuzan's freezing ability, creating cones of ice. And ice is easier to cut than rock, so it would require far less energy in a grand scale
You just explained that Law will have the better DC feats due to how his DF ability works. The response isn't who deserves more credit but who has the better feats. and clearly Law has it. AOE? Yeah, the cut at PH is his best feat. but those were indeed mountains. For argument sake, let's say those weren't mountains. Would the scenario have been any different if we replaced the "mountains" with actual real mountains? Nope. Law could of been to cut them up because of how his DF works.

Also, go back and read that comment, he said Zoro has way better destructive feats. but you're arguing the difference is minimal/similar.
 
Last edited:

Anduril

Active member
Legendary
Joined
Mar 17, 2011
Messages
12,892
Kin
42💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
In a fight Law would win mainly because his DF is really tricky...but Zoro has way better destructive feats.
It's a stupid comment. Law sliced a meteorite with relative ease & you should already know what he did to Vergo and the factory/mountains with one swipe. Law's DC is scary.
I said, that's how I felt. Nobody asked for your stupid suggestions on what we think.
 

Hexuze

Active member
Supreme
Joined
May 19, 2011
Messages
20,359
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
I said, that's how I felt. Nobody asked for your stupid suggestions on what we think.
Wow, someone got defensive. xD Mind explaining how Zoro has way better destructive feats? It's a discussion if you haven't noticed but if you want to stay irrelevant as always, then please do.
 

Anduril

Active member
Legendary
Joined
Mar 17, 2011
Messages
12,892
Kin
42💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Wow, someone got defensive. xD Mind explaining how Zoro has way better destructive feats? It's a discussion if you haven't noticed but if you want to stay irrelevant as always, then please do.
Yes I want to remain irrelevant as always. Better than explaining things to you xD
 
Top