- Joined
- Dec 28, 2012
- Messages
- 538
- Reaction score
- 53
Kaguya is the strongest character. How can he be sexist then?
Kaguya was not portrayed in a sexist way. However there is a general pattern of sexism among Kishimoto's females. I explained all of this in earlier comments.Kaguya is the strongest character. How can he be sexist then?
Sakura was fawning over Lee in his dreams while Lee beat people up. Hence, Kishimoto is showing males as dominant.
lolwut.....Japanese manga artists have a simplistic and child like view of females.The dreams, emotions, and ambition of women is something that japanese male manga artist can't understand nor properly convey because i doubt many of them have experience with females outside of masturbating to weird japanese pron and watching reruns of Baywatch.
Um..... NO? That's Lee's ideal world. Sakura would never act like that in the real world, so this is not Kishi's portrayal of females in that instance, but Lee's desire. It's really not that much different than Ino's dream, so are you arguing that he's portraying females as the dominant forces?
I don't feel Big Brother figure is fitting to the matter much but meh.good,good, label everything sexist or racist. Its just what they want
You must be registered for see images
Let me get this straight; its sexist to portray a woman as wanting men? Or is it because he didn't make her more ambitious? It its the latter, then you must be a 1970's feminist.Firstly, yes you are right that Lee's dream is about Lee's mind, and not Kishi's portrayal of females. I was explaining how the fact that here is a girl in lee's dream does not contradict my argument.
As for Ino's dream, the sexist part is hat all she does is tand there blushing over two boys.
I don't feel Big Brother figure is fitting to the matter much but meh.
Individually, all of your points are correct. However, once we put all of these dreams together, a pattern emerges of women obsessing over men.
Its a reference to the book 1984.
In said book the government tries to control what people think and do with words. The labeling of everything as sexist or racist fits these guidelines
Yeah i read the book, that's why i said it is not fitting much.
I don't think government would want things to go that way. Atleast where i live. Or in the book. I don't recall government trying to empose the over boarding with nitpicking in concept of human rights over people.
You must be registered for see links
it starts with little things like this