Itachi's real age.

What do you think?

  • Thank you

    Votes: 94 78.3%
  • I still believe Owarij

    Votes: 26 21.7%

  • Total voters
    120
  • Poll closed .

Masashi Kishi

Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
154
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
I was reading the thread about Owarij and he says Itachi was 11 when he beat Orochimaru, I assure you he is wrong. I have worked with Kishimoto and done many databooks etc. But no matter what I did I am nothing on this site so I will go ahead and explain completely why he is wrong.

Proof #1-



Kakashi himself says Itachi was still with the leaf village at age 13.

Also the only reason he didn't use MS on Orochimaru was because he did not need to. Not because he was 11 and could not use it.

Proof #2- Also the databooks have it that Sasuke Uchiha was 7-8 at the annihilation of the clan right? Now Sasuke was 12 years old when Itachi visited. Do the math

12-8= 4

Means he came only 4 years after the clan was assassinated, am I correct? Even if Sasuke was 7 than it means it has been like 5 years.

Now you claim that Itachi was 11 when the clan was massacred right?

11+4= 15
11+5= 16

So you are saying that Itachi was 15-16 when he visited in part 1, 4 years later when actually he was 17-18. So are you disagreeing with the data books?

Yes you are because we just found out that Itachi visited 4-5 years from the clan massacre due to Sasuke's age meaning you are saying Itachi was like 15 when he visited if he was 11 when the clan got massacred. When databooks say you are wrong, he was like 18 when he visited.



In this they are referring to how they met up last time that was 7 years ago. They should of made it more clear saying "we did this 7 years ago when Orochimaru was still around, before Orochimaru left". Unless this manga is in part 2 (I believe it is not), Orochimaru was still around 7 years ago. I have already discussed when Orochimaru left with Kishimoto.

So now Owarij says that this whole thing is point less^^ because Itachi could of been involved before he murdered the clan.

This is wrong because the Akatsuki have always been taking only S rank criminals. Not 11 year old children.

There is no way they would accept some 11 year old and trust him, partner them up with one of their most powerful members and also give him the uniform and everything.

Also look at his height, you can tell he was not 11 and even by his looks.

He was a member of the Akatsuki and had already joined. There is no way he was "involved" at age 11! Also Owarij also said that this is how he found out mask man=Madara because he learned he was the leader.

This is wrong, no one knew about Tobi at all at the time, Tobi wasn't even recognized as a member to the other Akatsuki until Sasori died. So there is no way some 11 year old kid with no S rank crime came and found everything out and also its common sense and Kishimoto would of stated that Itachi was "involved" before.

Proof #3-

Meanwhile the manga only states he joined the Akatsuki After he killed the Uchiha clan and became an S-rank criminal.



So I give Owarij credit for pointing out somewhat of an error but I still think he is Wayyyyy to stubborn and stills believes he is right, however-

Please do not hate on me, I already admitted I am not Kishimoto however have done some work with him. I have given you guys proof to help clear things out for you. My work here is done.

All the best
By "involved" I clearly meant member. Woow even children would know that and not get stuck up on one word. Anyways i meant member thats why i put the quotations on "involved". Also there is no proof he was "involved" either.:flaw:
 

Disquiet

Active member
Supreme
Joined
Feb 8, 2011
Messages
32,590
Kin
2💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Once again. The when your partnered up with some one you have joined. It also says on Narutopedia that he defeated Orochimaru after he "joined" the Akatsuki.
i quoted the manga at first when Tobi said he came to Akatsuki after killing the clan.

He quoted the wiki to prove me wrong, I just quoted it right back.
you brought up narutopedia right there, and you keep messing yourself up.
 

~Uzumaki~

Active member
Elite
Joined
Sep 21, 2011
Messages
6,485
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
When one joins Akatsuki they are patnered with someone immediately as seen with Tobi and Deidara so Itachi was patnered with Kisame and when they met for the first time Kisame mentions the clan massacre. Also, Sasuke slashed Itachi's forehead protector but we see him with it when Orochimaru tried to take his body forehead protector already slashed, to say he was involved at 11 is saying Akatsuki saw a Chunnin level Anbu member with no legendary acts and a simple Sharingan who was still affliated with his village as fit to hunt Bijuu as an Akatsuki member and they were ok with him not having a partner for two whole years(he met Kisame after the massacre) and still remaining with his village, he also didn't wear his Akatsuki ring at all times like other members for two years(we never saw him with it while in the village), he also didn't wear the Akatsuki cloak. Also, while so distant from Akatsuki he figured out Tobi existed and made a deal. This is the definition of impossible.
 
Last edited:

Disquiet

Active member
Supreme
Joined
Feb 8, 2011
Messages
32,590
Kin
2💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
By "involved" I clearly meant member. Woow even children would know that and not get stuck up on one word. Anyways i meant member thats why i put the quotations on "involved". Also there is no proof he was "involved" either.:flaw:
"and he starts the insults"

it's nothing personal, I just love to debate, I find anything I can, like I'm about to do now.

by "involved" owarij "clearly" meant NOT being a member.

you were actually quoting what he was saying, and that is that what he meant.

you're gonna have to try again xd
 

Masashi Kishi

Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
154
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
When one joins Akatsuki they are patnered with someone immediately as seen with Tobi and Deidara so Itachi was patnered with Kisame and when they met for the first time Kisame mentions the clan massacre. Also, Sasuke slashed Itachi's forehead protector but we see him with it when Orochimaru tried to take his forehead protector already slashed, to say he was involved at 11 is saying Akatsuki saw an Chunnin level Anbu member with no legendary acts and a simple Sharingan who was still affliated with his village as fit to hunt Bijuu as an Akatsuki member and they were ok with him not having a partner for two whole years(he met Kisame after the massacre) and still remaining with his village, he also didn't wear his Akatsuki ring at all times like other members for two years(we never saw him with it while in the village), he also didn't wear the Akatsuki cloak. Also, while so distant from Akatsuki he figured out Tobi existed and made a deal. This is the definition of impossible.
^^ This is what I am saying. Even Tobi said he joined after killing the Uchiha. And yes he was a Chuunin at the time. I gave manga proof while he brought up Narutopedia proof against me and I brought it right back. Either way

Conclusion: he was not an 11 year old when he beat Orochimaru
 

Masashi Kishi

Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
154
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
you brought up narutopedia right there, and you keep messing yourself up.
True but only because he didn't get the manga picture.

"and he starts the insults"

it's nothing personal, I just love to debate, I find anything I can, like I'm about to do now.

by "involved" owarij "clearly" meant NOT being a member.

you were actually quoting what he was saying, and that is that what he meant.

you're gonna have to try again xd

Ok i am not a debater but sure I will try. I clearly meant "being a member" and still i was right.
 

Owarij

Active member
Legendary
Joined
Oct 3, 2011
Messages
13,322
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
^^ This is what I am saying. Even Tobi said he joined after killing the Uchiha. And yes he was a Chuunin at the time. I gave manga proof while he brought up Narutopedia proof against me and I brought it right back. Either way

Conclusion: he was not an 11 year old when he beat Orochimaru
You brought up narutopedia proof first , saying "even narutopedia said it" I went and got narutopedia proof saying he was involved with akatsuki before killing his clan...
 

Owarij

Active member
Legendary
Joined
Oct 3, 2011
Messages
13,322
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
When one joins Akatsuki they are patnered with someone immediately as seen with Tobi and Deidara so Itachi was patnered with Kisame and when they met for the first time Kisame mentions the clan massacre. Also, Sasuke slashed Itachi's forehead protector but we see him with it when Orochimaru tried to take his body forehead protector already slashed, to say he was involved at 11 is saying Akatsuki saw a Chunnin level Anbu member with no legendary acts and a simple Sharingan who was still affliated with his village as fit to hunt Bijuu as an Akatsuki member and they were ok with him not having a partner for two whole years(he met Kisame after the massacre) and still remaining with his village, he also didn't wear his Akatsuki ring at all times like other members for two years(we never saw him with it while in the village), he also didn't wear the Akatsuki cloak. Also, while so distant from Akatsuki he figured out Tobi existed and made a deal. This is the definition of impossible.
Sasuke never slashed Itachi's headband....
You must be registered for see images
 

Masashi Kishi

Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
154
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Guess the newbie is trusted more by NB than the GREAT Owarij
So he is considered pretty great on here huh?

I didn't get a manga picture? WTF
You must be registered for see images

Kisame Hoshigaki Said it


You must be registered for see images


Sasori of the red sands said it
Tobi said otherwise. I said other wise. Naruto pedia said otherwise. Manga said otherwise. Even Narutobase said other wise.
 

Disquiet

Active member
Supreme
Joined
Feb 8, 2011
Messages
32,590
Kin
2💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
True but only because he didn't get the manga picture.




Ok i am not a debater but sure I will try. I clearly meant "being a member" and still i was right.
how were you right? if he was involved with akaktsui before then, owarij was right when he said they were "involved" because that is what the narutopedia that YOU brought up stated.

^ this is what I ment to write
oh yeah, I'm going to go look at that post you were talking about
 

MinatoFLASH

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Jul 28, 2011
Messages
2,996
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
So he is considered pretty great on here huh?
[/QUOTE

No not really. This guy is just a ******, loser, nobody legit really likes him. Even after u said and explained how Minato would beat Itachi he disagreed and did not believe u or me or any of the other fans. Even Itachi Namikaze lost his patience with this idiot. I wouldn't blame u. Just leave this stubborn loser to think what he wants.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NarutoKage2

Owarij

Active member
Legendary
Joined
Oct 3, 2011
Messages
13,322
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
So he is considered pretty great on here huh?



Tobi said otherwise. I said other wise. Naruto pedia said otherwise. Manga said otherwise. Even Narutobase said other wise.
Kisame agrees with me, Sasori agrees with me. I agree with me :rolleyes:, Narutopedia agreed with me, Manga agreed with me-_-

I can do that exact same thing you're doing...
 
Top