He did not because if he did then the uchiha clan would have been the weakest clan which is not so.
Exactly. The uchiha clan is known as one of the two strongest clans ever, and a clan of geniuses should be able to defend themselves against a 13 year old.I believe Itachi was ordered to murder his clansmen , but he refused because hated wars and even though he was frustrated he didn’t' think it was necessary to murder them. However, he was pressured by both sides and could only protect sasuke.Could be true, never really thought itachi could wipe out his clan by himself. That really underrates the power of the uchiha clan
Meh.
Maybe. Maybe not. We shall see.
Though I do agree that Tobi at least helped in the killing
Thx and NP. We will just have to wait and see but the uchiha clan is known for their double layered genjutsu.It wouldn't really change anything, because the sacrifices have already been made and all the involving parties have been punished.Ehm i don't really think so... The whole Naruto series have involved the Uchiha thing this whole time. If it's all a lie I think Kishi could just as well throw the manga out the window.
It would kinda be like Naruto not being a Jinjuriki if you get what I meanPlus I don't think it eould be appropriate to shoe a mass murder On TV ( A lot of parent would complain )
But still a good theory tho![]()
Tsukuyomi is an illusion that is completely controlled by the user; Itachi can even alter time and perception so it would easy for him to make Sasuke see the, nonexistent, massacre. As you said, Kishi didn't show a lot off details-more imporantly, we didn't see Itachi get his hands dirty.Nothing is ever a coincidence in this manga and Itachi is adamant about telling Sasuke the truth.We have not seen Itachi directly kill anybody.Itachi is a pacifist yes, that's why he was against the coup à tète that some members planned against Konoha. Didn't he state somewhere in the manga that he no longer considered himself as a member of the Uchiha clan because they were planning an uprising?
As for the Sasuke forcing to relive the murder spree - well, wasn't that memory from the point of view of Sasuke? That would explain why we didn't see Itachi killing the clan. I don't think Kishimoto-sensei ever really focused on Itachi's memories or thoughts.
And I can believe that Itachi was able to kill the clan - he was practically the strongest of them all, he even had acquired the Mangekyou Sharingan which only a few Uchihas had achieved in the past.
So as long as the manga doesn't explicit say that Itachi didn't kill the clan, I'm going to believe he did it for the sake of peace in the village.
You're right about them being a power clan but Itachi was considered a prodigy. Plus like I stated he was one of the few who awakened the Mangekyou Sharingan which gave him an advantage against the others. And you're also right about Itachi not willing to work with Tobi but he was a spy for Konoha if I remember correctly. It would benefit Itachi more as a spy if Tobi believed him to be on his side. Point is that we don't know a lot about that night - but still I would be a bit annoyed if it turned out that Itachi didn't kill the whole clan, and it would get a bit confusing too.Tsukuyomi is an illusion that is completely controlled by the user; Itachi can even alter time and perception so it would easy for him to make Sasuke see the, nonexistent, massacre. As you said, Kishi didn't show a lot off details-more imporantly, we didn't see Itachi get his hands dirty.Nothing is ever a coincidence in this manga and Itachi is adamant about telling Sasuke the truth.We have not seen Itachi directly kill anybody.
Itachi might have been the strongest, but the uchiha clan, as a whole, was known as a power clan.It doesn't make sense unless Tobi helped- which I doubt because I don't see why Itachi would work with Madara.
Nice analysis and something which has been on my mind ever since I learned that Tobi was with him. I never believed the story of Itachi killing his clan just to measure his strength in the first place. He always had a mysterious aura around him which didn't match such a shallow reasoning to wipe all the Uchihas. It was always like there got to be more to that story.I have always believed Itachi had massacred his clan, but the longer this story continues, the more confusing the events get. I don’t know if we are dealing with a retcon or not, but Kishi clearly wants us - through characters- accepting Itachi, as a remorseful hero, who’s always been loyal to Konoha. "I will always be Itachi uchiha of the hidden leaf village"- Itachi.
Obviously, this isn’t possible with a guy who committed “genocide” which is why I think Kishi plans on dropping a bomb before Itachi goes away, permanently. Kabuto, repeatedly, emphasizes on Itachi’s lying capabilities and there’s a reason for that…
First of all, on the night of the massacre, we did not actually see Itachi go on a killing spree. No women no baby no anything. He made Sasuke relive witnessing his parents’ death, yes, but we didn’t actually see bloodshed on Itachi’s part. Kishi left it very open, with good reason; he only made us privy to very few details so he could change it later on. The only time we actually saw Itachi on the crime scene was when he was found in his parents’ room. I mean for all we know, he just arrived to the scene as well, or he had to personally be there so he could convince Sasuke that he was the murderer. Are we supposed to believe that a so-called pacifist would join forces with a maniac like Madara, and, willingly, rid the world of the uchiha clan all together?
Secondly, Itachi has remained very vague whenever the subject is brought up (he even told Naruto to be quiet), and the only thing Itachi fully acknowledges is the fact that he ruined Sasuke’s life. All the other stuff can easily change based on what really happened back then. On the other hand, he pretty much told Sasuke, that most things aren’t what they seem.
Finally, Itachi has flaws. Everyone can see them. However, all these flaws are completely ignored by everyone interacting with him. Almost like they all have blinders on. He is treated as a heroic, respected figure you better listen to, despite his track record suggesting otherwise. Naruto yelled and punched his own farther, yet blindly accepted everything Itachi had to say- including his comparison with the evil Madara. Killer B took it a step further and actually praised Itachi which tells me Itachi will someday be redeemed.
Who killed the clan?
Tobi or Danzo.
Iddeed, we will have to see.You're right about them being a power clan but Itachi was considered a prodigy. Plus like I stated he was one of the few who awakened the Mangekyou Sharingan which gave him an advantage against the others. And you're also right about Itachi not willing to work with Tobi but he was a spy for Konoha if I remember correctly. It would benefit Itachi more as a spy if Tobi believed him to be on his side. Point is that we don't know a lot about that night - but still I would be a bit annoyed if it turned out that Itachi didn't kill the whole clan, and it would get a bit confusing too.
So while your theory is interesting and well thought out, I just like to believe that Itachi indeed killed his clan. But I guess we just have to wait and see what the manga tells us ^^;
Thx. He is perhaps the most mysteries figure in the manga, and we receive a lot of info without actually getting any wiser. Why does Itachi keep alluding to the fact that reality may be a work of fiction? He obviously hiding something and Tobi getting involved makes it even worse. The only problem I had was why would Itachi take the blame and flee the country when he was innocent all along?Nice analysis and something which has been on my mind ever since I learned that Tobi was with him. I never believed the story of Itachi killing his clan just to measure his strength in the first place. He always had a mysterious aura around him which didn't match such a shallow reasoning to wipe all the Uchihas. It was always like there got to be more to that story.
Naruto yelling at his own father was different case though, That was personal to him. It was not a surprise that he believed and accepted Itachi- He had seen Itachi just before his death and that meeting had left him wondering about him. When Tobi narrated the story it kind of fit and finally he got confirmation directly from Itachi. So accepting it easy. Then, Naruto has been kind of always privy to many Konoha secrets all through years..
Everyone has flaws. Itachi had his own but he is already dead and while he lived he chose his own punishment. A lot of people lived a peaceful life- A whole new generation of shinobies( Konha11) got a chance to survive and grow. He doesn't complain nor he dwells on it drowning himself in self pity for his losses or the hate he had to endure for his actions which were good for whole village but him. So despising him for it has no meaning. You shouldn't grudge him the respect he gets from a select few who know the truth.
I have always believed Itachi had massacred his clan, but the longer this story continues, the more confusing the events get. I don’t know if we are dealing with a retcon or not, but Kishi clearly wants us - through characters- accepting Itachi, as a remorseful hero, who’s always been loyal to Konoha. "I will always be Itachi uchiha of the hidden leaf village"- Itachi.
Obviously, this isn’t possible with a guy who committed “genocide” which is why I think Kishi plans on dropping a bomb before Itachi goes away, permanently. Kabuto, repeatedly, emphasizes on Itachi’s lying capabilities and there’s a reason for that…
First of all, on the night of the massacre, we did not actually see Itachi go on a killing spree. No women no baby no anything. He made Sasuke relive witnessing his parents’ death, yes, but we didn’t actually see bloodshed on Itachi’s part. Kishi left it very open, with good reason; he only made us privy to very few details so he could change it later on. The only time we actually saw Itachi on the crime scene was when he was found in his parents’ room. I mean for all we know, he just arrived to the scene as well, or he had to personally be there so he could convince Sasuke that he was the murderer. Are we supposed to believe that a so-called pacifist would join forces with a maniac like Madara, and, willingly, rid the world of the uchiha clan all together?
Secondly, Itachi has remained very vague whenever the subject is brought up (he even told Naruto to be quiet), and the only thing Itachi fully acknowledges is the fact that he ruined Sasuke’s life. All the other stuff can easily change based on what really happened back then. On the other hand, he pretty much told Sasuke, that most things aren’t what they seem.
Finally, Itachi has flaws. Everyone can see them. However, all these flaws are completely ignored by everyone interacting with him. Almost like they all have blinders on. He is treated as a heroic, respected figure you better listen to, despite his track record suggesting otherwise. Naruto yelled and punched his own farther, yet blindly accepted everything Itachi had to say- including his comparison with the evil Madara. Killer B took it a step further and actually praised Itachi which tells me Itachi will someday be redeemed.
Who killed the clan?
Tobi or Danzo.
I also have been suspecting the same, but I just don't want to go through all the trouble of making a long thread and explaining it to people, +repsI have always believed Itachi had massacred his clan, but the longer this story continues, the more confusing the events get. I don’t know if we are dealing with a retcon or not, but Kishi clearly wants us - through characters- accepting Itachi, as a remorseful hero, who’s always been loyal to Konoha. "I will always be Itachi uchiha of the hidden leaf village"- Itachi.
Obviously, this isn’t possible with a guy who committed “genocide” which is why I think Kishi plans on dropping a bomb before Itachi goes away, permanently. Kabuto, repeatedly, emphasizes on Itachi’s lying capabilities and there’s a reason for that…
First of all, on the night of the massacre, we did not actually see Itachi go on a killing spree. No women no baby no anything. He made Sasuke relive witnessing his parents’ death, yes, but we didn’t actually see bloodshed on Itachi’s part. Kishi left it very open, with good reason; he only made us privy to very few details so he could change it later on. The only time we actually saw Itachi on the crime scene was when he was found in his parents’ room. I mean for all we know, he just arrived to the scene as well, or he had to personally be there so he could convince Sasuke that he was the murderer. Are we supposed to believe that a so-called pacifist would join forces with a maniac like Madara, and, willingly, rid the world of the uchiha clan all together?
Secondly, Itachi has remained very vague whenever the subject is brought up (he even told Naruto to be quiet), and the only thing Itachi fully acknowledges is the fact that he ruined Sasuke’s life. All the other stuff can easily change based on what really happened back then. On the other hand, he pretty much told Sasuke, that most things aren’t what they seem.
Finally, Itachi has flaws. Everyone can see them. However, all these flaws are completely ignored by everyone interacting with him. Almost like they all have blinders on. He is treated as a heroic, respected figure you better listen to, despite his track record suggesting otherwise. Naruto yelled and punched his own farther, yet blindly accepted everything Itachi had to say- including his comparison with the evil Madara. Killer B took it a step further and actually praised Itachi which tells me Itachi will someday be redeemed.
Who killed the clan?
Tobi or Danzo.
Furthermore, how did no one in the village witness or see any signs of struggle? The ENTIRE UCHIHA clan was wiped out and no one heard or saw anything?Explains how Danzo was in possession of those Sharingan, but Orochimaru never seemed capable of getting one. But why do it? Either they're lying about the planned coup and there was some other purpose to destroying the Uchiha, but who could've done it, alone? Only Itachi...maybe. I've always wondered how Itachi could destroy his entire clan and die at the hands of Sasuke (even with sickness), but then it was suggested he had help. So, if Itachi needed help, but didn't really kill them, how many people were needed to take down that many Sharingan users? Was it a silent army of trained ROOT members?
Yeah its pretty obvious especially in the last 2 chapters that the massacre is not all it seems. Glad someone pointed this out because this is exactly what i have been thinking.I have always believed Itachi had massacred his clan, but the longer this story continues, the more confusing the events get. I don’t know if we are dealing with a retcon or not, but Kishi clearly wants us - through characters- accepting Itachi, as a remorseful hero, who’s always been loyal to Konoha. "I will always be Itachi uchiha of the hidden leaf village"- Itachi.
Obviously, this isn’t possible with a guy who committed “genocide” which is why I think Kishi plans on dropping a bomb before Itachi goes away, permanently. Kabuto, repeatedly, emphasizes on Itachi’s lying capabilities and there’s a reason for that…
First of all, on the night of the massacre, we did not actually see Itachi go on a killing spree. No women no baby no anything. He made Sasuke relive witnessing his parents’ death, yes, but we didn’t actually see bloodshed on Itachi’s part. Kishi left it very open, with good reason; he only made us privy to very few details so he could change it later on. The only time we actually saw Itachi on the crime scene was when he was found in his parents’ room. I mean for all we know, he just arrived to the scene as well, or he had to personally be there so he could convince Sasuke that he was the murderer. Are we supposed to believe that a so-called pacifist would join forces with a maniac like Madara, and, willingly, rid the world of the uchiha clan all together?
Secondly, Itachi has remained very vague whenever the subject is brought up (he even told Naruto to be quiet), and the only thing Itachi fully acknowledges is the fact that he ruined Sasuke’s life. All the other stuff can easily change based on what really happened back then. On the other hand, he pretty much told Sasuke, that most things aren’t what they seem.
Finally, Itachi has flaws. Everyone can see them. However, all these flaws are completely ignored by everyone interacting with him. Almost like they all have blinders on. He is treated as a heroic, respected figure you better listen to, despite his track record suggesting otherwise. Naruto yelled and punched his own farther, yet blindly accepted everything Itachi had to say- including his comparison with the evil Madara. Killer B took it a step further and actually praised Itachi which tells me Itachi will someday be redeemed.
Who killed the clan?
Tobi or Danzo.
Why is it so hard to get? Itachi is not some god who can take out the majority of the village while also protecting his little brother which was already his nr1 priority. We already know Itachi made a deal with both Danzo and Tobi, individually, so obviously Itachi did the only thing he felt he could do at that time. He didn’t tell Sasuke because he didn’t want Sasuke to attack the elders, attack Tobi, and, more importantly, he didn’t want Sasuke to hate anybody but him. Itachi would still feel guilt from the fact that he couldn’t save his clan, he chose Sasuke over their life and he believed he didn’t have a right to do that- which is why he wanted to die by Sasuke’s hands.he had to personally be there so he could convince Sasuke that he was the murderer
So....... WHY did he take the wrap for whoever DID kill the Clan...? And why would he lie to Sauske about it...? And lastly, why would he want Sauske to kim him if he didn't feel guilt of killing his Clan...? THIS MAKES NO SENSE.
Danzo could not use Shisui’s eye in that battle, and nowhere did I suggest that Danzo did it alone (although he was a hokage candidate and he wouldn't do much worse than a 13 year old Itachi). When I say Danzo I clearly mean him and his goons, and obviously they operated during the night which they, as an underground spy agency, specialize in. He could have also already acquired the senju cells because Orochimaro likely worked with him before he left the village, plus you don’t need sharingans to enjoy the benefits from senju cells.Tobi also played an unknown role and we know that him and Danzo saw each other the night of the massacre so they could have made a deal as well.Who killed the clan?
Tobi or Danzo
Dude, wtf? Danzo couldn't kill Sauske by himself and he had 10 sharigan eyes and Shisui's eye. HOW COULD HE KILL ALL THE ULCHIHA BY HIMSELF WITHOUT USING IZANAGI/IZANAMI??? And He would have had Shisui's eye at this time, but unable to use it unless he had the Hashi Arm before he started the killing spree, but IDK why he would have Hashi's cells in him before he had all the other sharigan. Fail.