We are talking about Naruto Vs Sasuke as a whole.So to not list Naruto's powers is ridiculous.As i said,Naruto could only use their special abilities cause he had their help,and yes Naruto did have chakra from all the Bijuus.
Uhmm...what? Were talking about what they did in VoTe 2 and their abilities in VoTe 2, adding in abillities they have but did not use is ridiculous since were not creating a hypothetical battle between them, were discussing an actual battle from the manga. Stick with the discussion bud.
Sasuke could of forced Naruto to get serious.You assume he couldn't because he took chakra from the Bijuu.It's not like Sasuke went all out,and Naruto shrugged it off.It's not like Sasuke used most of his own chakra whilst going all out and Naruto shrugged it off,then he decided to take the Bijuus chakra as a last resort.
Okay, then explain to me, if Sasuke is so "powerful" on his own, why would he need bijuu chakra? Why would he take it in the first place? And if he was strong enough without the bijuu, then how come he still tied when he got the bijuu? You realize Sasuke with bijuu is stronger than Sasuke without bijuu? Yet he tied with Naruto.
Instead Sasuke flawlessly put all the Bijuu in Genjutsu,then Chibaku Tensei,with absolute ease,and had them suspended in the air while he fought Naruto all throughout chapter 695,using multiple techniques all without showing any sign off exhuastion.
Yes, and then he took the bijuu chakra.
But Sasuke taking chakra from the Bijuu is convienent to you,cause you can act like that was neccesary.You do realize Naruto is the guy who was tramsforming into a bunch of naked males in the most important battle in history,against the strongest person in history,with the world at stake right? Naruto wasn't serious against Kaguya,does that mean he was stronger than her,and could beat her alone? No.
Just because Naruto used a dumb technique doesn't mean he wasn't serious, he was trying to distract Kaguya, which worked, it was a plan he formed with Sasuke, which Sasuke agreed to, so if Naruto wasn't serious, Sasuke wouldn't have been serious either, since he knew exactly what Naruto was talking about, and allowed it, if he was serious, he would have told Naruto not to be stupid and do something like that. So its obvious they were serious.
But Naruto not being serious right away against Sasuke means he's stronger than him,and could beat him right? To you yes.Due to not ever even thinking about what i just said about how Naruto is with Kaguya,and wanting to put Naruto above Sasuke.
Stop putting words into my mouth, i never said that, your the one going off saying "Ohhh, Sasuke was strong enough already but he wanted Naruto to get serious by getting bijuu chakra" and im stating that he didn't even get serious when Sasuke got the bijuu chakra, trust me buddy, the only one desperately trying to put one character over another is you, i never even stated Naruto > Sasuke and you go on putting words in my mouth.
Sasuke owned the Bijuu,so Naruto couldn't get support from his Bijuus bros.He had their chakra to use,but he couldn't talk to all 9 of them for help against Sasuke,like calling upon four tails again to load up some magma style,or one tails for some magnet.Sasuke made sure Naruto would only have one helper.
Sasuke didn't "own" the bijuu, he just had them under genjutsu, and let me ask you this, Kurama was also put into genjutsu, why could Naruto talk to him? Half of Kurama means half of Kurama's chakra, which means Naruto had kurama's chakra and not kurama entirely, just like he had the bijuu chakra, yet he could talk to kurama. We clearly saw Kurama being put in a genjutsu too. Yet Naruto was talking to him throughout the battle.
Also,the winner of the battle isn't the one who can make the bigger explosions.It could end without it.I'll give my reasonings some other time.I'm not going fully in depth now.
Okay, first of all, what are you talking about? What winner of the battle? The winner of VoTe 2 was Naruto (Before you start saying the common arguments such as "Ohhh they were both in the same condition" let me just say that if a person admits defeat, that means he is defeated regardless of the condition of both fighters). Were not talking about a different fight, i don't know what your talking about, im talking about VoTe 2, and thats what we were debating about the whole time, your throwing the topic in all these directions. What winner? What reasoning? What battle?