It is a major component, but its the least important major component of them all. I don't watch DBS nor Naruto for the animation. I watch DBS because I genuinely like it...most of the time, anyway, and I watch Naruto for the Shinden novels....well, I'm not watching right now, and I skipped the entirety of the end of the Obito fight all the way until the end of the Kaguya fight, which was when VOTE2 was announced.Well, if you watch Naruto and DBS till this day then you tell me Gunt
Well, that was a major change in artstyle, so the unfamiliarity is understandable. But what if we're talking about the shitty art style of a new series that by itself shows a lot of potential in other areas?I'm used to Sasuke not looking like Professor Snape.
Well...you are the exception though. You like Jojo's.Not really. I can't think of a series that I dislike mainly because of its art style. If it does bother me then I'll get used to it over time.
Which means it doesn't matter if you truly enjoy and love what you watch, just like me.It is a major component, but its the least important major component of them all. I don't watch DBS nor Naruto for the animation. I watch DBS because I genuinely like it...most of the time, anyway, and I watch Naruto for the Shinden novels....well, I'm not watching right now, and I skipped the entirety of the end of the Obito fight all the way until the end of the Kaguya fight, which was when VOTE2 was announced.
It doesn't matter if someone can't get into a series because of its art-style. Don't need to talk with someone that ignorant.Well...you are the exception though. You like Jojo's.
The very reason I made this thread is because a lot of people here from what I looked up were turned off on it because of its artstyle when things like One Punch Man and One Piece have proved how little a part it plays on the creation of a quality manga. I do wonder why....
Those are different though. The artstyle will always be your first impression of it, regardless of what you're reading or watching. You can watch a brilliant film with simplistic cinematography all the way through if you see it has other things going for it, you can read a novel without perfect grammar if something about it compels you, you can sustain bad gameplay if the video game has something else to offer.By comparison, here's how the same question looks in different mediums: How much does cinematography affect a film to you? How much does grammar affect a book to you? How much does gameplay affect a video game to you?
Yeah, I'm talking 'bout JoJo.It doesn't matter if someone can't get into a series because of its art-style. Don't need to talk with someone that ignorant.
What series are you talking about? JoJo?
Well, I think in this case animation would be more important than artstyle. IMO, if the manga has a strange artstyle but a good story, characters, pacing....its still worth it. Anime is mostly adapting manga stories with the primary purpose of animating them. If its the primary purpose, its not something you should fail on. Especially in the case of adaptations.Which means it doesn't matter if you truly enjoy and love what you watch, just like me.
And I'm pretty sure there are others who feel the exact same way...well to be fair animation back then was the best for both those series which I think in turn the animators and creators thought "hey, we gave them crispy ass animation back then and built a strong fanbase with story, intense moments, great characters, we good bro" years later... "lets bring that back or continue that, but only we already have the fanbases sniffing at our asses that we don't have to work as hard because we built a core fanbase off of the old stuff"
You must be registered for see images
Don't confuse it. Animation and art style are two very different things. EG: Mob Psycho 100. Very simplistic art style, incredible animation.If one punch and many other animes didn't have that art style/animation most of then wouldn't even be populaire. It annoys me when the animation is shit