Homosexuality (since it has been a popular topic on NB as of late)
- Thread starter ChrisWolf
- Start date
- Status
Are you trying to justify Pedophilia?
Norms are divided into Mores and folkways. Mores are the serious ones while folkways are the not so serious norms. Sexual perversion is an example of breaking mores.
Selendrile
Active member
Awards
A History of American Ignorance:
1. Salem Witch Trials (Early 1600's)- If a woman's ugly or poor, "SHE'S A WITCH!"
2. Indians (ONGOING
)- They live in huts, so they must be savage and inferior! We deserve the land more! Let's burn their land down to expand ours without even trying to make peace first.
3. Slavery (mid 1700's to mid 1800's)- He's black, and therefore inferior. i'll just make him work extra long hours in cruel conditions without pay.
4. Immigrants (1840's and a new movement started recently)- The Irish (and now Mexicans) are getting hired instead of us! let' persecute! It's not like if we work hard like them we'll get the job too!
5. Asian Racism (Late 1800's to early 1900's)- The country of Japan destroyed a couple of ships! That must mean ALL Japanese are evil, and need to be excluded! The CHinese are inferior, let's pay them 2 cents a day to work on dangerous railroads.
6. Segregation (It's height was during 1940's to 1950's)- They're black, and we're better, we can separate them form us since they're inferior.
7. Gays (Present)- (See thread xd)
NUFF SAID... it's just another battle for civil rights. Mark my words though! "We will not equivocate -- we will not excuse -- we will not retreat a single inch -- AND WE WILL BE HEARD."
1. Salem Witch Trials (Early 1600's)- If a woman's ugly or poor, "SHE'S A WITCH!"
2. Indians (ONGOING
)- They live in huts, so they must be savage and inferior! We deserve the land more! Let's burn their land down to expand ours without even trying to make peace first.3. Slavery (mid 1700's to mid 1800's)- He's black, and therefore inferior. i'll just make him work extra long hours in cruel conditions without pay.
4. Immigrants (1840's and a new movement started recently)- The Irish (and now Mexicans) are getting hired instead of us! let' persecute! It's not like if we work hard like them we'll get the job too!
5. Asian Racism (Late 1800's to early 1900's)- The country of Japan destroyed a couple of ships! That must mean ALL Japanese are evil, and need to be excluded! The CHinese are inferior, let's pay them 2 cents a day to work on dangerous railroads.
6. Segregation (It's height was during 1940's to 1950's)- They're black, and we're better, we can separate them form us since they're inferior.
7. Gays (Present)- (See thread xd)
NUFF SAID... it's just another battle for civil rights. Mark my words though! "We will not equivocate -- we will not excuse -- we will not retreat a single inch -- AND WE WILL BE HEARD."
You sure you're talking to the right guy? Really stupidity like this doesn't deserve anything else, also a bit flaming from time to time keeps up the fun :3
Actually yes, unfortunately a gene like this exists.
Same old joke. Not funny, although you get better.
IntrovertedKittenNinja
Active member
No matter how anything you say is interpreted it doesn't change the fact that the majority of what you say tends to be misguided and ignorant.
You just can't compare those two. They're completely different. How do we know what is linked to genes and what is nurtured by society?
For example, if I exposed you over and over again to pedophilia and little kids, will you eventually develop a fetish for little girls or boys? I'm going to guess your answer will be no. But by your logic, since being gay is a choice, then you could eventually develop that fetish.
IMO, homosexuality is influenced by both nurture AND nature. Sure, certain genes might make a man more feminine and prone to liking the same ***, or a woman more masculine and prone to being attracted to the same *** while on the same token, the environment can influence this as well. I highly doubt there's a specific gene we could just pluck out of our DNA to make us impermeable to homosexuality.
Amanwithnoplan
Active member
Selendrile
Active member
Awards
NarutoVsGoku
Active member
ook
one can be sexually aroused or attracted to females or males but sexual arousal doesnt forces you to be straight or gay. it influences your desicion but thats just it, you have a desicion. you have a choice whether to act upon what arouses you.
to say that one has a gene because of what they are aroused to or attracted to is ridiculous.
people who are aroused by children. pedos. do they have a pedo gene? people who have fetishes and aroused by inanimate objects like underwear, feet, or whatever. do they have genes for that specific fetish?
people who are aroused by animals. do they have a beastiality gene?
is there a straight gene or bisexual gene? our sexual preferences are choices, preferences.
anyways i am attracted to females i guess because of how i was raised, but its also most definently a choice. i like females, and boobies, and etc.
I never said homosexuality was a sexual perversion but it can be interpreted as such by people. because logical thinking dictates penis goes inside vagina. The word perverse basically means odd or abnormal so if a rather large percent of people are straight like lets say 98% and 1% is gay and the other percent is bi then being gay or bi maybe seen as perverse by the majority because they are not big enough to be classified as "normal".
Amanwithnoplan
Active member
IntrovertedKittenNinja
Active member
lolol nonono I think what he meant was that person had a *** change. I have a lot of friends from the Philippines and those kinds of things are kind of common.
*facepalm*
This made no sense? Being gay means you want dick and your a man so if your sexually aroused that means you want the dick whether you refuse or not. If you want dick you are gay.Its like about having *** with a girl then she says that she doesn't want to do it so that makes her a lesbian right?
Amanwithnoplan
Active member
Maybe. But he said this was his gay friend. And having a *** change and being gay are different things. At least I think so.
- Status