Me neither >.<Fellowship of the Ring. o-o
I just found that more exciting and overall enjoyed it more. <.<
The Hobbit was a great film though, and can't wait for part 2.
he's a fool D<I personally prefer LoTR, but if someone prefers HP good, I like HP too, however you, that just bashed something for no reason, I just cant take seriously ... but than again it might just be to complicated for you to understand that hating and bashing is just a waste of time
have a nice day![]()
Both Stories are great! though I prefer LOTR.Well the whole story line of lotr is better, but the hobbit itself was better in quality and i can't say much about the story line because we still have 2 parts to go
I love Tolkien fans ._.I would say The lord of the rings, because its awesome and its also a complete trilogy.
The story line is better.
None can really judge The Hobbit yet, because there are still 2 more movies that are to be shown.
But part 1 of The Hobbit was such a brilliant movie in my opinion.
But comparing the two: The Fellowship Of The Ring and An Unexpected Journey I would have to say I prefer prefer The Fellowship Of The Ring
I don't think it had a slow pace, the Hobbit has more action than the first LOTR imo. And with the cast part, they are both wonderfully chosen, the dwarves are brillI'd have to say LoTR: Fellowship of the Ring.
Although I did enjoy The Hobbit, I found Fellowship to be much more interesting and works well as a standalone movie. The Hobbit is too focused on build-up for its sequels, and so it suffers from a slow pace and less action. Admittedly, I liked the cast in Fellowship more so than the cast of The Hobbit, so that could also be a factor in why I liked it more.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^The Hobbit was good, but LoTR is legendary u-u