Xylon's posts: I do agree at the fact that if gay marriage is allowed more gay or lesbians that are currently hiding their choice of being like that would appear on the map. This would cause a huge problem if this was about the population. Not to offend anyone, and just like Xylon said, but to be gay is actually and path that isn't supposed to be taken. To put it harshly, it's a choice that you made like you made a choice to steal money out of a register. Love is what counts mostly so it's mostly overlooked at corruption, but in reality you did corrupt your sexual integrity.
Now don't get me wrong, being straight isn't the way better way of life or anything, it's just that look at the past. Maybe people get humiliated, hurt, attacked, and even killed by just being gay. I do adore their courage, but at the same time it is their fault due to people hating difference and change. They will always be attacked and always considered a problem.
shonenvan's posts: The way you explained how love works seems to be the general and correct idea. No one, well I would hope not, thinks of a single mother/father less than a normal family. In fact most people would look up to them more than other 2 parent families.
Scary Yamato posts: Thank you ^^ Also about the part of thinking people are born gay. There was always speculation that people would be born gay at times due to the fact that all babies start as a female regardless of what they will be at the time of birth. When this was discovered they believe that is how it is, but after many tests and follow up questions of how their life were (read it somewhere i know it) they decided this didn't have enough evidence to be true.
People are influenced in their sexual life just like they are influenced in mannerisms. People will either copy, do the opposite, or ignore both depending on the popularity/risk involved. This grand ultimate choice of being straight or gay is decided on many things like fear, love, location, man to woman ratio, lust, and even mistake in teaching.
Lord Danzo's post: I do agree that it is up to the church, well technically regardless of my opinion it truly is up to them, and the state laws should allow such a union of two people. Though it really wouldn't happen. Most, or maybe all, religions cast out the filth that is of the gays. No offense to anyone that is gay, but all religions in it's roots hate your corrupted choice in sexuality since it shows weakness towards the god(s).
About the gay or lesbian couples that are together with a child, adopted or born by having donated sperm/egg, I believe it's practically the same for the child up to a certain age of understanding. First it's about the tools, fathers are actually under the requirements to be able to raise a child. Mothers can give their child breast milk and have the inner ability of nurturing. Men are considered hunters or protectors of the family and do not have the same outlook in raising a child regardless of sexual orientation. After a while of raising a child, the teens mostly, this type of family can cause many social problems for the child that can lead into many horrible situations. From humiliation and courage to face the year ahead of him or her, to even suicide for the sheer fact they are threaten or are different from what his or her parents are.
The lowered population would also help the world, but at the same time it would hurt it if it persists. I wasn't just talking about a timeline of allowing this form of life live peacefully in society. I was considering it to continue from here on out, so regardless of how much time it would actually take to make the population lower to dangerous levels; it will eventually get there.
TL;DR
Xylon: Agreed and in that blocked of text I explained my idea or how most people would think of what gay is.
shonenvan: Agreeing about the aspect of family love and how families outlooks are.
Scary Yamato: A thank you and some info about the born being gay idea.
Lord Danzo: Talking about the lowering population, the same *** parent families, and the church vs state allowance of gay marriage with a bit of religious stuff that I believe and heard of through talking to people of that religion.
Now don't get me wrong, being straight isn't the way better way of life or anything, it's just that look at the past. Maybe people get humiliated, hurt, attacked, and even killed by just being gay. I do adore their courage, but at the same time it is their fault due to people hating difference and change. They will always be attacked and always considered a problem.
shonenvan's posts: The way you explained how love works seems to be the general and correct idea. No one, well I would hope not, thinks of a single mother/father less than a normal family. In fact most people would look up to them more than other 2 parent families.
Scary Yamato posts: Thank you ^^ Also about the part of thinking people are born gay. There was always speculation that people would be born gay at times due to the fact that all babies start as a female regardless of what they will be at the time of birth. When this was discovered they believe that is how it is, but after many tests and follow up questions of how their life were (read it somewhere i know it) they decided this didn't have enough evidence to be true.
People are influenced in their sexual life just like they are influenced in mannerisms. People will either copy, do the opposite, or ignore both depending on the popularity/risk involved. This grand ultimate choice of being straight or gay is decided on many things like fear, love, location, man to woman ratio, lust, and even mistake in teaching.
Lord Danzo's post: I do agree that it is up to the church, well technically regardless of my opinion it truly is up to them, and the state laws should allow such a union of two people. Though it really wouldn't happen. Most, or maybe all, religions cast out the filth that is of the gays. No offense to anyone that is gay, but all religions in it's roots hate your corrupted choice in sexuality since it shows weakness towards the god(s).
About the gay or lesbian couples that are together with a child, adopted or born by having donated sperm/egg, I believe it's practically the same for the child up to a certain age of understanding. First it's about the tools, fathers are actually under the requirements to be able to raise a child. Mothers can give their child breast milk and have the inner ability of nurturing. Men are considered hunters or protectors of the family and do not have the same outlook in raising a child regardless of sexual orientation. After a while of raising a child, the teens mostly, this type of family can cause many social problems for the child that can lead into many horrible situations. From humiliation and courage to face the year ahead of him or her, to even suicide for the sheer fact they are threaten or are different from what his or her parents are.
The lowered population would also help the world, but at the same time it would hurt it if it persists. I wasn't just talking about a timeline of allowing this form of life live peacefully in society. I was considering it to continue from here on out, so regardless of how much time it would actually take to make the population lower to dangerous levels; it will eventually get there.
TL;DR
Xylon: Agreed and in that blocked of text I explained my idea or how most people would think of what gay is.
shonenvan: Agreeing about the aspect of family love and how families outlooks are.
Scary Yamato: A thank you and some info about the born being gay idea.
Lord Danzo: Talking about the lowering population, the same *** parent families, and the church vs state allowance of gay marriage with a bit of religious stuff that I believe and heard of through talking to people of that religion.
