btw do you think gramma has been town reading you?lol I fell asleep
He visited you but idk why.
he claims to have protected you last night.
btw do you think gramma has been town reading you?lol I fell asleep
@Grammaton what's your read on Toujo at the moment?
She asked Grammaton about Toujo's read and voted the cwI think hes town
Sigh, yes, we still hopeNo worries. Once we get a flip here I feel I'll be able to do a bit better.
OkI buy his Miller claim for now.
Why do you wanted Ted to use this civic duty and not Toujo whom you defended?I mean mostly true but still have a civic duty to make yourself clear town
You didn't find any wolfi don't, i have to find the wolves
which are still not flipped and prob won't care a lot until i see i'm wrong
Whatanyway i'm here to vibe at this amazing EoD
Why were you coaching Ted?Finding mafia is only half the game. It’s no good being right if you can’t execute your will, and if people don’t trust you, how will you ever do that?
But to each their own I guess
Why wouldn't I bring up my ideas?Michelle just curious why you brought this up now. We're you just trying to catch him while he's on
Don't have enough time to determine whether he's scump, cop, etc and I'd rather not potentially split wagons with the vote count being invisible
You wanted him to be towny, but you brought up this, but never pursued itI’m not a fan of this ‘nothing harmful happened’ defence
There’s roles such as rolecop, framer, redirector etc that wouldn’t leave a trace
Michelle wasn’t a watcher target, he’s claiming to not have a town read so bodyguard isn’t out of the question ..
Alice instinct is rarely wrongI'm confused with your intention doe?
Too wordy to not hide other intentionsi had her as a villa lean for reasons that don't outweight the fact that we were looking at the thread sideways and actions like voting for gamma out of nowhere which i just don't see her doing
she seemed weird enough to me that i thought a track would be helpful, if she's a villager then she's a great addition and if she's a wolf then it's an ez pelt and it would've given me the likelihood of Gamma being a wolf with her early vote that was out of place
You claimed you gave him a ring, what is that?Can I just ask, what result other than being seen at soulkiller would you have seen as suspicious?
You aware I visited soul last night?
This is the post who made me think X voted AetherAether needs to be yeeted this night.
ultra lets do it, i'll blast the scum outta hereStill have some hours left in the day to use an ability pending host
But the thing is I actually have to gift an ability to someone else. So they've gotta be reasonably trustworthy not just in terms of alignment but not likely to screw something up
That's not the right way to play smhif its a kill, hand it here. I will kill aether, and if by some miracle im wrong, i will vote myself and you can all lynch me, I wont fight it
he is clearly faking his confidenceThat's not the right way to play smh
Have you read Poison's Iso? There is no way she don't have a slip in her postshe is clearly faking his confidence
Sure.if its a kill, hand it here. I will kill aether, and if by some miracle im wrong, i will vote myself and you can all lynch me, I wont fight it
Wow, where to begin.She asked Grammaton about Toujo's read and voted the cw
She mentioned she sheeped Grammaton, idk what to do with this
Sigh, yes, we still hope
Ok
Why do you wanted Ted to use this civic duty and not Toujo whom you defended?
You didn't find any wolf
What
Why were you coaching Ted?
Why wouldn't I bring up my ideas?
You wanted him to be towny, but you brought up this, but never pursued it
Alice instinct is rarely wrong
Too wordy to not hide other intentions
You claimed you gave him a ring, what is that?
This is the post who made me think X voted Aether
@Grammaton
And if i am right you are in Toujo's votants![]()
I asked itt for protection, so it's rather consistent. It aligns with his claim. No other doc claim. It's a solid claim. Mostly trust him.btw do you think gramma has been town reading you?
He visited you but idk why.
he claims to have protected you last night.
Sure.
Thing is...well, ok. I'll just decide to put it in the open.
I'm an inventor who is able to create literally any one shot I want depending on *checks rule list* the approval of a higher power. So, while I think a kill would be most useful here, y'all should help me come up with ways to get the most outta this ability before it gets too silly too be vetoed
Currently here's my proposal:
"A heat seeking missile, which allows you to shoot a player, and then, if that player scans innocent, the missle will change trajectory and hit the player that person is voting for instead (regardless of the second players alignment)"
The above would allow for a kill on Aether and also give a check to someone
Some noted limitations of this ability I've discovered through trial and error are that I can't get anything better than a cop check alignment wise. In other words any alignment dependent ability would pass over a godfather, who is almost certainly in the game.
I *can* apparently do a role cop though, and this is probably better than the above
So anyway I wanna crowd source this to get better ideas and for some fun
So Soul sets out his stall that acting 100% certain someone is scum is tunnelly, and thus scummy behaviour
I challenge him to find evidence of him not doing the same thing ...
More of this ...
So the posts hes referrign to are these ...
Both of these posts reek of leaving an escape door if Toujo has a claim that is airtight town. I don't detect any sincerity or considerattion that he may be wrong, which basically means hes doing exactly what hes trying to shade Toujo for, ostensibly because I also brought it up about Toujo's early play re: Michelle
Thanks, this does make sense. I'll re read it to make a comment and decide on the vote maybe.
a standard day superkill is what I would go for. Guarantees a result if the player is BP / scans innocent. If theres only 2 wolves, something that relies on alignments wont be conclusiveSure.
Thing is...well, ok. I'll just decide to put it in the open.
I'm an inventor who is able to create literally any one shot I want depending on *checks rule list* the approval of a higher power. So, while I think a kill would be most useful here, y'all should help me come up with ways to get the most outta this ability before it gets too silly too be vetoed
Currently here's my proposal:
"A heat seeking missile, which allows you to shoot a player, and then, if that player scans innocent, the missle will change trajectory and hit the player that person is voting for instead (regardless of the second players alignment)"
The above would allow for a kill on Aether and also give a check to someone
Some noted limitations of this ability I've discovered through trial and error are that I can't get anything better than a cop check alignment wise. In other words any alignment dependent ability would pass over a godfather, who is almost certainly in the game.
I *can* apparently do a role cop though, and this is probably better than the above
So anyway I wanna crowd source this to get better ideas and for some fun
I reached this idea by myself, thanksWhy would I have a scummate openly sheep me day 1, when they can instead incriminate another town player by claiming to sheep them?
how am i faking confidencehe is clearly faking his confidence
I replied to it and gave it a score of 0/10 because I dont think you thought it through properlyWhat do you think about what i posted regarding Aether's action on me @Grammaton ?
Going to assume outright that I can't commission a super kill, could ask.a standard day superkill is what I would go for. Guarantees a result if the player is BP / scans innocent. If theres only 2 wolves, something that relies on alignments wont be conclusive
outside of the box, you could create a census so we know exactly what the split is, or some kind of sensor which tells us how many scum were on a wagon (could use this on rejs lynch for example)
whatever it is, make sure it can be used during day so it cant be tampered with
Why?I replied to it and gave it a score of 0/10 because I dont think you thought it through properly