TheNuetrix
Member
Enel is a very powerful character but many people underestimate him because of how he was defeated so early on in the series by an early-story Luffy. Luffy only won that fight due to his DF abilities, if he weren't made of rubber he would have gotten one shot just like everyone else in the arc.
I think Enel could probably take down Cracker tbh. Here's why:
1. Cracker is a more "Defensive type" fighter as he keeps his distance and hurls his infinite number of biscuit soldiers at his opponent. This was the most difficult thing for Luffy in their fight as Luffy, even in Gear 4, couldn't get near Cracker because of all the biscuit soldiers. Enel on the other is more balanced out, he has exceptional range, deadly offense and his logia's intangibility and regenerative capabilities make for a formidable defense.
2. Cracker's biscuit soldiers can't even touch Enel. Objects can only be coated in Armament Haki if the user is touching it. This is one of the major disadvantages of Cracker's defensive fighting style in this fight. Unless Cracker is touching his soldiers they will just pass through Enel like water through a strainer. It'll look something like this:
Also Cracker's lack of creativity and versatility in the use of his DF is also another disadvantage.
3. Enel is evidently quicker than Cracker. While Cracker may have CoA haki which will allow him to injure Enel in close-quarters combat, Enel's ability to predict enemy attacks (Observation haki) and his superior reflexes while allow him to dodge and evade Cracker's attacks in the event he decides to get up close and personal.
4. Lightning is dangerous, very dangerous. Enel was one-shotting guys like Zoro, Sanji and Wyper like there's no tomorrow, and that was with his weaker attacks. If Enel unleashed something like "Max 200 Million Volt Amaru" (which doesn't need support from Ark Maxim), that would be a guaranteed death for Cracker. Big Mom would have to make funeral arrangements instead of planning a wedding/assassination. Heck, while Cracker is busy vainly clapping biscuit soldiers into existence, Enel could just spam "El Thor" and burn his biscuits.
He can probably off Jack too.
If you don't agree, say why.
I think Enel could probably take down Cracker tbh. Here's why:
1. Cracker is a more "Defensive type" fighter as he keeps his distance and hurls his infinite number of biscuit soldiers at his opponent. This was the most difficult thing for Luffy in their fight as Luffy, even in Gear 4, couldn't get near Cracker because of all the biscuit soldiers. Enel on the other is more balanced out, he has exceptional range, deadly offense and his logia's intangibility and regenerative capabilities make for a formidable defense.
2. Cracker's biscuit soldiers can't even touch Enel. Objects can only be coated in Armament Haki if the user is touching it. This is one of the major disadvantages of Cracker's defensive fighting style in this fight. Unless Cracker is touching his soldiers they will just pass through Enel like water through a strainer. It'll look something like this:
You must be registered for see images
3. Enel is evidently quicker than Cracker. While Cracker may have CoA haki which will allow him to injure Enel in close-quarters combat, Enel's ability to predict enemy attacks (Observation haki) and his superior reflexes while allow him to dodge and evade Cracker's attacks in the event he decides to get up close and personal.
4. Lightning is dangerous, very dangerous. Enel was one-shotting guys like Zoro, Sanji and Wyper like there's no tomorrow, and that was with his weaker attacks. If Enel unleashed something like "Max 200 Million Volt Amaru" (which doesn't need support from Ark Maxim), that would be a guaranteed death for Cracker. Big Mom would have to make funeral arrangements instead of planning a wedding/assassination. Heck, while Cracker is busy vainly clapping biscuit soldiers into existence, Enel could just spam "El Thor" and burn his biscuits.
You must be registered for see images
He can probably off Jack too.
If you don't agree, say why.
Last edited: