Test: So, potential Sensei, please tell me a bit about Temari.
Testee: What? What does Temari have to do with anything?
Test: You should know about Temari. Don't you know about Temari?
Testee: Sure I do, but I'm trying to become a teacher, not a part of the Naruto Discussion section.
The written test, one of the two tests one must pass to become a Sensei in the RP, covers more than it should. Why should I make example combinations and defenses when the second part of the test is a Battle Test?
Senseis need to be knowledgeable about the RP and able to teach well. Whether they're good fighters or not really doesn't matter as long as they're able to battle 'correctly' and explain the nature of the techniques they use.
I am of the opinion that the written test should consist only of questions pertaining to the teaching system. Give an example of how you would explain jutsu X. What aspects of the techniques are you going to focus on and why? There are already questions like 'how would you explain the Great Fireball Technique?' My suggestion is simply to remove the excess 'fat' if so to speak and stick to what actually matters. Even if the Staff doesn't want to come up with new question this suggestion is still very valid in my opinion. Less questions of a deviant nature might mean the difference between a pass and a fail.
What's not to like?
Testee: What? What does Temari have to do with anything?
Test: You should know about Temari. Don't you know about Temari?
Testee: Sure I do, but I'm trying to become a teacher, not a part of the Naruto Discussion section.
The written test, one of the two tests one must pass to become a Sensei in the RP, covers more than it should. Why should I make example combinations and defenses when the second part of the test is a Battle Test?
Senseis need to be knowledgeable about the RP and able to teach well. Whether they're good fighters or not really doesn't matter as long as they're able to battle 'correctly' and explain the nature of the techniques they use.
I am of the opinion that the written test should consist only of questions pertaining to the teaching system. Give an example of how you would explain jutsu X. What aspects of the techniques are you going to focus on and why? There are already questions like 'how would you explain the Great Fireball Technique?' My suggestion is simply to remove the excess 'fat' if so to speak and stick to what actually matters. Even if the Staff doesn't want to come up with new question this suggestion is still very valid in my opinion. Less questions of a deviant nature might mean the difference between a pass and a fail.
What's not to like?