Do you believe in God?

sd***sdgsdagdsgsdgsdgsdgsdggsdgdsgsdg

  • I Believe In God

    Votes: 375 67.3%
  • I Am An Agnostic

    Votes: 55 9.9%
  • I Am An Atheist

    Votes: 127 22.8%

  • Total voters
    557

Xentinel

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
4,148
Reaction score
393
So this God of yours made us to be rational thinkers. Then your God denies us evidence of its existence. Then your God condemns people who do not believe, into eternal suffering? Your God condemns people for using the brain that it gave us?

What type of God is that?

I believe God has given us more evidence then we need. Just then some of us didnt realize it. Maybe if we open our heart or eyes. Maybe you will see it. See the cloud for instance. We all know it was formed when water vapor cools down and turn into a water droplet, forming a cloud. But don't you realize the shapes of cloud is just a speechless phenomenal? Its an Art. The clouds hang in the blue sky. Does it has a string? Its perfect. And this is maybe 1 out of 1 million God's masterpiece.

Isnt that enough already? What evidence you need in order for you to believe? Seeing Heaven at the outer space with your telescope? Then you zoom in more and you see God in his throne?

Anyway, that's my opinion. I dont want to argue with anyone. Not that im losing the debates/argument. But I believe the argument will go no where. -_-
 

Anorien16

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Sep 3, 2010
Messages
5,543
Reaction score
497
I believe God has given us more evidence then we need. Just then some of us didnt realize it. Maybe if we open our heart or eyes. Maybe you will see it. See the cloud for instance. We all know it was formed when water vapor cools down and turn into a water droplet, forming a cloud. But don't you realize the shapes of cloud is just a speechless phenomenal? Its an Art. The clouds hang in the blue sky. Does it has a string? Its perfect. And this is maybe 1 out of 1 million God's masterpiece.

Isnt that enough already? What evidence you need in order for you to believe? Seeing Heaven at the outer space with your telescope? Then you zoom in more and you see God in his throne?

Anyway, that's my opinion. I dont want to argue with anyone. Not that im losing the debates/argument. But I believe the argument will go no where. -_-

Clouds hang for many reasons and its behaviors can be otherwise explained but i wont argue i have a question for you: If a man never declares himself as a Christian yet believes in some kind of higher power, lives his life as a good man helping others and dies trying to do good for entire humanity . . . then when he discovers that the Christian God is true and asks for forgiveness from him . . . do you think he should be forgiven? or should a Christian murderer who killed many people be forgiven?
 
Last edited:

Ashflura

Leaf Village Regular 🍃
Regular
Joined
May 25, 2012
Messages
765
Reaction score
166
So this God of yours made us to be rational thinkers. Then your God denies us evidence of its existence. Then your God condemns people who do not believe, into eternal suffering? Your God condemns people for using the brain that it gave us?

What type of God is that?
God does not condemn people who haven't been informed. People born without messengers in there time, will not go to hell. Where with the internet nowadays, research is at your finger tips, not being informed is pretty rare, so it's up to the individual to be the judge of their own path. Temples, mosques, churches, etc. are mass spread, going on a spiritual journey can start with asking the local practitioner.

Allah does not condemn people for using their brains, but condemns their inappropriate actions.
 

squigles

Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2008
Messages
359
Reaction score
34
If there's no God, then who created the universe? where did mankind ridiculously come from?

This is a stupid question. Why does the universe have to be created? Why does it have to be created by someone? When you posit that the universe was 'created' your choice of language automatically assumes that it was created by someone. This is a logical fallacy.

So any time you posit 'creation' you are also positing a 'creator,' and then an infinite regression can only explain 'who' the creator is. An infinite regression is in fact, a non-answer.

The ones who dont believe in Allah, one God, are lost in the deeepest of the darkness!!! Similar to the one in a cold night , middle of the sea on a low tide, when ur not able to see ur own hand!!!

How are we lost? We don't have false hope that our lives have some external meaning that will be known to us after we die. Instead, we live in such a way that creates meaning here in the real world, within the one live we KNOW we are going to have. Why would anyone spend their life here in search of God, only to die never having lived a life of true meaning here on earth?

I would just like to ask everybody a few questions. Do you know the odds that our planet somehow formed in the perfect spot with the perfect materials to sustain life today? Do you know the odds that mutations occurred in certain organisms at certain times in certain ways to end up the way we are today? Do you know the odds that these mutations would differentiate in such a way to create the diversity of life today? There is a chance that all the air in the room you are in right now would accumulate in one corner of the room leaving a vacuum in the rest. This is highly improbable but still has a higher chance of happening than the odds in my previous questions. This is why I believe in a higher being who created an intelligent design. Who said that this design had to be perfect? or easy for those abiding in it? Just because we have no scientific proof of something existing doesn't mean we have proof of it not existing. The odds are that there is something greater than us. I don't know what it is exactly but I am confident in my relationship with the Christian God. What do I have to lose?

Ahhh, the old 'impossible odds' and 'finely tuned universe' argument. If the universe were finely tuned for life, then why is it that most of the places you go in the universe are not hospitable for life? Most planets are much too hot, much too cold, have no elements that can sustain life, or are ridden with violent weather systems that would instantly kill the kind of life we have here on earth.

That doesn't sound like fine tuning at all, to me. On the flip side, we have witnessed the formations of galaxies and planets and explained it with Einstein's laws of relativity. Regarding the 'odds' of the universe existing in it's current form, let's say we were playing poker. Let's say you were dealt a hand of Ace, Five, Nine, Two, and Jack, with all different suits. It's a terrible hand, worth absolutely nothing aside from Ace high.

However, the odds of you getting that actual hand based on a prediction, is 0.0038476929233231754240157601502139e-7 (1/2,598,960). The universe exists exactly in the way that it does which could generate intelligent life capable of asking these questions. If the universe existed in any other way, we wouldn't be here to tell about it. However unlikely the odds may be, they still don't prove that a God exists. The odds that the shitty poker hand I talked about above being predictably dealt are astronomically small, but it happens, most likely at least once per day, somewhere, on some poker table in the world.

Just because there are small odds of something happening a certain way, doesn't mean that they cannot happen without some divine intervention.

Edit: To people wondering what created the creater. What created the first mass and energy in the universe? If you believe in the findings and theories in science of the beginning of our universe then you believe that some things where just there and have always been.

Science is the observation and explanation of testable and repeatable events in the universe. Under no circumstances does science assume anything without evidence. Science only talks about the beginning of the KNOWN universe, which is everything within the red light shift of the 'big bang.' Everything beyond that red light shift is unknown to us, because we cannot see past it.

In fact, there are a great many things on this side of the red light shift that we don't know. There are several theories being worked on at the moment to try and gain some sort of understanding of our universe, but every single one of them is 100% dependent on evidence.

That is the difference between science and religion. We don't make assertions without evidence to back up our claims, and to that effect, we would not make an assertion that a God exists and that he created the universe. There is no evidence to support that viewpoint, and there is even less evidence to support the notion of a personal god who loves you and cares about you.

If every single person in the world still believed in a god, and has done so for the entirety of human history, we would still be living in the Bronze age where there is a 50% child mortality rate, where life expectancy is age 30, and people die from simple things like child birth and the common cold.

The fact is that because people stopped believing in god, we've advanced as a civilization, creating technology, science, and medicine, improving lives while prolonging life 3x as long as in the Biblical days.

To the people wondering how evolution plays into the way the Bible explains how God created our world. It is said in the Bible that a day to God is much longer to us. The 7 "days" that God created Earth could have been millions of years in our sense of time.

The bible doesn't explain anything. It just says that 'god did it all' in a few days. It also says that god created all plant and animal life as is, and completely disagrees with the theory of evolution. If not for the facts that science has discovered with evolutionary theory and biology, then creationists wouldn't be trying to weasel evolution into the bible.

The fact of the matter is that there are mountains of evidence supporting evolution, and nothing supporting creationism. In fact, there is zero evidence of God himself, and that's a problem for anyone claiming that he exists. Religion has not met it's burden of proof on any supernatural claims being made, and that is why people are atheists. By definition, the word 'faith' is a position of believing something without any evidence, so it's befitting of religion and religious claims.

However, science and the progress of civilization have no need of faith. We observe reality and progress within reality based on the facts and evidence that we accumulate. The computer you are using to post on these forums came from science and technology, and our understanding of physics in reality.

If you had been using this computer during the times of Moses, you would have been stoned to death for witchcraft, because whatever cannot be explained by the bible is obviously magic, and anyone practicing magic is obviously a witch. The bible is rather clear on the punishment for witches.

It's also pro slavery, pro abortion, pro murder, pro war, and pro incest. Based on morality alone, the bible fails miserably. The 613 commandments don't hold a candle to the average 6 yr old who watches Sesame Street.

So sure, you can believe whatever you want to believe. Just keep your religion to yourself and we'll be fine.
 
Last edited:

jewliun

Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2010
Messages
30
Reaction score
1
Re: Do you believe in God? Contains explanation!

Yes I believe in God. The reason why is because I don't see how everything in his world could work together like this without a designer. If you think about all the things we as humans can do, then it's hard to think that we came here by chance. One argument for atheism is "what makes your God more real than mine?" well I think the first step is deciding whether you believe in a supernatural being or not. Then you can find out who he is. Most Atheist will insist that you prove God exists, but I thinks it would make more sense to prove that God doesn't exist. Sometimes we as people think that if you can't explain something then it's simply not there. Just like radio waves and UV rays didn't "exist" hundreds of year ago. Don't get me wrong we might never be able to prove physical evidence of a God. But that doesn't mean he doesn't exist or that there isn't other evidence.

Just look at the trees, we would definitely not be able to survive without them. And they would not be able to live without us. How could these two completely different organisms come to an agreement to make the gases that they each other need to survive. That's just one example but there are many more. The examples prove that there was some kind of plan for both organisms. And evolution just doesn't make sense. There's no way that a fish can go from water to land and survive long enough to adapt. I think evolution is just something to fall back to if you don't believe in God.

I think one of the biggest arguments against believing in God is "well where did he come from?" If you look at anything around you you can probably figure out the origin. It's natural for us to assume that everything has an origin and end because that's all we know. So the idea that a God has always been there and will always be there is difficult for us to grasp. I don't think we'll ever understand God completely because He is a more advanced being than us. Just like how the species under us will never completely understand us. As a proud people its hard for some of us to accept that we are not the most intelligent or powerful beings.

Well those are just my thoughts. :)
 

squigles

Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2008
Messages
359
Reaction score
34
Yes I believe in God. The reason why is because I don't see how everything in his world could work together like this without a designer.

How do you get from 'I don't understand how the world works' to 'god must have done it?' That's a huge logical misstep. You could logically go from 'I don't understand how the world works' to 'I can't make any assertions,' but you instead decided to make the leap and assert that god MUST be responsible.

If you think about all the things we as humans can do, then it's hard to think that we came here by chance.

Not if you study the natural world and accumulate physical evidence. Just open a paleontology text book, and you can learn how life went from being simple to being complex, as well as how trees and people have a symbiotic life. You would then have an understanding of that part of nature, and you wouldn't have to blindly assert that 'god did it.'

One argument for atheism is "what makes your God more real than mine?" well I think the first step is deciding whether you believe in a supernatural being or not.

Atheism isn't a world view, it's not a set of beliefs. It's simply a negative position on one topic: the existence of god(s). All atheism has to say is that we don't believe in a god, which is not dependent on any other world view or belief system. What makes matters worse, is that the lack of belief in god is given this special title when no other lack of belief is.

We don't have a word for people who don't believe in Santa Claus or the tooth fairy. We don't have a word for people who don't believe in unicorns or goblins. So why is there such a stigmatic association with lack of belief in a god?

Also, the 'first step' in any discussion is not to decide whether you believe in a god or not. The first step is to study the world and universe in which you live, learning and understanding how it works and what is real. Then you formulate a position based on the evidence that is accurately presented.

Most Atheist will insist that you prove God exists, but I thinks it would make more sense to prove that God doesn't exist. Sometimes we as people think that if you can't explain something then it's simply not there. Just like radio waves and UV rays didn't "exist" hundreds of year ago. Don't get me wrong we might never be able to prove physical evidence of a God. But that doesn't mean he doesn't exist or that there isn't other evidence.

Any positive claim has what's called the 'burden of proof.' This means that it's not up to anyone to disprove god's existence, it's up to those people who are claiming that he does exist, to provide the evidence that proves it.

If I told you that my cat was murdered by Abraham Lincoln, it's up to me to provide the evidence proving as much, or no one has any reason to believe me. You wouldn't go on a manhunt for Abraham Lincoln and then arrest him, just because of a claim like that.

First I would have to provide evidence that I had a cat, that the cat was murdered, and then link that evidence to Abraham Lincoln (who's been dead for nearly 150 years). Secondly, if I cannot provide evidence of anything I claimed, then you wouldn't hesitate to dismiss my claims entirely.

This is where atheism stands on god. There are over 30,000 religious denominations within the world, all making claims about god and nature. God cured my cancer. God made the world and everything in it. God answered my prayer and gave me the winning lotto ticket. Ect, ect, ect.

These are all positive claims making an assertion based on their beliefs in the supernatural. If you want anyone to believe them, you need to provide evidence. At any time when science can observe and test a supernatural event (including miracles by god) then it can be explained, and is no longer supernatural.

You're right in that just because we don't have an explanation for something, doesn't mean it doesn't exist. However, we also don't make claims about things we don't understand until we have an explanation for something which is supported by factual evidence. God, and all religious supernatural claims have not yet met their burden of proof, and it is unreasonable for anyone to expect others to believe in them.

And evolution just doesn't make sense. There's no way that a fish can go from water to land and survive long enough to adapt. I think evolution is just something to fall back to if you don't believe in God.

Evolution doesn't make sense to people who don't bother to learn anything about it. I can guarantee that if you took a biology class you would learn enough to have an understanding of it AND it would make more sense to you. Evolution is not a fall back position, it is the ONLY position we have evidence to support.

Every living organism is made of the same 4 basic building blocks, arranged in a sequence that is similar within all life. Because of these facts, we can trace back our ancestry within DNA. We have 6 main classifications for animal species: mammals, birds, reptiles, fish, insects, and amphibians. Dolphins and Wales are an example of a mammal that has become aquatic (went from living on land to living in water).

Here's a video to help you gain a better understanding of Evolution.


 

AP2k

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
5,089
Reaction score
523
:sy:

Ok I will argue with you seriously U_U
on one condition, you keep your tongue in control. dont insult anyone, and argue with facts and figures,and try to understand what i say in spite of my so called bad grammer and engish:rolleyes:

Bring it on.:cool:

So wait, you've (tried) to insult me, you've ignored facts, and you tell ME to stop doing those things? Btw you spelled "grammar" wrong :p
 

Chakra Wizard

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Mar 25, 2012
Messages
8,958
Reaction score
336
as a christian do you hate everything except jesus?

in the bible what does it say happens to non-believers?

3 - look up jehovah's witnesses and blood transfusion.

do you also believe that a newborn child is born in "sin" that it has inherited from an imaginary being named Adam? This is scapegoating by the way.

Obviously not. Those who choose not to believe are sent to Hell, those who lived life without ever hearing the gospel won't be condemned for they were simply never given the opportunity to hear His word.

Jehovah's Witness is a different branch of Christianity and I already told you that I can't stand when an average person tries to preach the gospel, so don't come to me talking about them. And I don't care what they think about it, if someone needs a blood tranfusion, I couldn't care less. The only blood that's sacred in my opinion is that of Christ.

And obviously, until a newborn is able to understand faith and sin, it's still pure and will go to heaven if something happens to it in that time. We're obviously not born to go straight to Hell. And I'm getting sick of these childish antics you're pulling here, scoffing at our religious figures like they were fictional characters from a terrible movie. That arrogance enrages me to no end. God help whoever knows you in real life.
 

toothpaste

Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
68
Reaction score
3
I believe God has given us more evidence then we need. Just then some of us didnt realize it. Maybe if we open our heart or eyes. Maybe you will see it. See the cloud for instance. We all know it was formed when water vapor cools down and turn into a water droplet, forming a cloud. But don't you realize the shapes of cloud is just a speechless phenomenal? Its an Art. The clouds hang in the blue sky. Does it has a string? Its perfect. And this is maybe 1 out of 1 million God's masterpiece.

Isnt that enough already? What evidence you need in order for you to believe? Seeing Heaven at the outer space with your telescope? Then you zoom in more and you see God in his throne?

Anyway, that's my opinion. I dont want to argue with anyone. Not that im losing the debates/argument. But I believe the argument will go no where. -_-

Did your God create disease and famine too?

Clouds stay afloat because of the very thing that forms them. A cloud's individual particles are so small that warm air rising from the earth's surface is able to keep them floating in the air.
 
Joined
Jun 15, 2012
Messages
50
Reaction score
4
To say God exists without question seems slightly stupid, but saying he/she doesn't exist is equally as stupid. Therefore God(s) will never be proven or disproven, if enough scientific evidence supports the big bang religious people will still say God created the big bang. Science continuesly disproves things i religion, proof of evolution, the world not being 6000-10000 years old etc. I do go to a Catholic school (for 11 years), so I like to think I understand the problems that come with believing everything in the bible. Discrimination, hatred, and ignorance is found everywhere in my school. The idea of forgiving everyone through Jesus gives these people a false sense of righteousness. Only those who believe can rest eternaly in heaven. While the world around us continues to become more horrendus, God is no where to be found. People dying of starvation, diseases, killing, and a dissapearing middle class. If any God does exist he/she has long abondened us. I assume you are talking about Christianity and Catholicism, these two religions may be considered copycat religions. Paganism (an older religion that christianity) has many similar celebrations and beliefs. On december 5th they celberated the winter solstace, they ut up trees in their houses and went caroling. Easter was their celberation of their god being reborn out of an egg. This is where we got the easter egg hunt from. Overall religion is a mechanism for controlling people, and giving them reasons to discriminate and marginalize other people, scientific evidence continuosly disproves what was thought as true in religion, and lastly if he/she does exist they have abonded us. Because of these reasons, I am an Atheist.
 

AP2k

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
5,089
Reaction score
523
you started it. :p

No, i didnt. I tried to explain a different religion and you felt you should flip shit because i wasnt saying the information you have been spoon fed.
 

toothpaste

Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
68
Reaction score
3
Obviously not. Those who choose not to believe are sent to Hell, those who lived life without ever hearing the gospel won't be condemned for they were simply never given the opportunity to hear His word.

Jehovah's Witness is a different branch of Christianity and I already told you that I can't stand when an average person tries to preach the gospel, so don't come to me talking about them. And I don't care what they think about it, if someone needs a blood tranfusion, I couldn't care less. The only blood that's sacred in my opinion is that of Christ.

And obviously, until a newborn is able to understand faith and sin, it's still pure and will go to heaven if something happens to it in that time. We're obviously not born to go straight to Hell. And I'm getting sick of these childish antics you're pulling here, scoffing at our religious figures like they were fictional characters from a terrible movie. That arrogance enrages me to no end. God help whoever knows you in real life.

your god is simply an emotionally unstable psychopath.. he creates us the way we are. he condemns us for using our intellectual faculties. god is also needy.. god is an ultimate being, but needs the worship of humans. those who do not worship are sent to hell. but god loves you!

the jehovah's witness case is just an example of what faith can do.

no. your jesus died to absolve everyone of sin. this includes future generations. somehow a new born child is responsible for the mistake of its imaginary ancestor, Adam.

Do you believe in Zeus? Hades? Jupiter? Ra? Odin? Thor? Brahma? Allah? Vishnu? Muhammad?

i simply criticize. however, it is ironic that you claim me to be arrogant when you believe in the bible. your bible does not prove anything to be true.
 

Dr Dark Knight

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
3,450
Reaction score
196
My post.

For the last time, I am not Christian. I don't have the knowlege of the Bible, that you keep insulting. Being a Muslim, I have respect for Bible because we believe that Jesus(p.b.u.h) was a messenger of God. We dont stand for the Bible to be insulted.

The crow will never become white by calling it white. What is Satan?
It is based on the concept of the devil from our religions. how can you say that Satanism is something entirely new. Even the name is derived from the Arabic word Shaitan. and you defend yourself by saying that it is something entirely new. Satan is the negative force described by the believers. Someone makes a new religion, worshiping the evil described in our religion. And you expect me to say that Satanism is a new religion? Go get your info right kid.

your post.
Oh no!!!! New things!!!! New things scare me!!!! Please, don't tell me about new things!!!! That's not what my brianwashing told me!!! I can't accept anything that is diferent then my negative pre-concieved stereo types of people who don't think exacty like i do!!! Im scared!! I don't like it when someone tries to tell me something new!! Blah blah blah i cant hear you!!!!


God damn how immature are you? You refuse to acknowledge a religion simply because it isnt what you THINK it should be?


That was personal there were no facts or explanation in that. you want me pissed off? fine. if you cant, or dont want a civil discussion, tell me.

I know I did grammer mistakes like didnt put a ' in my dont, and misspelled grammar again so no need to point that out. so... you want to do it politely or not?U_U
 

Chakra Wizard

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Mar 25, 2012
Messages
8,958
Reaction score
336
your god is simply an emotionally unstable psychopath.. he creates us the way we are. he condemns us for using our intellectual faculties. god is also needy.. god is an ultimate being, but needs the worship of humans. those who do not worship are sent to hell. but god loves you!

the jehovah's witness case is just an example of what faith can do.

no. your jesus died to absolve everyone of sin. this includes future generations. somehow a new born child is responsible for the mistake of its imaginary ancestor, Adam.

Do you believe in Zeus? Hades? Jupiter? Ra? Odin? Thor? Brahma? Allah? Vishnu? Muhammad?

i simply criticize. however, it is ironic that you claim me to be arrogant when you believe in the bible. your bible does not prove anything to be true.

Every single time you post, I try to reply in as polite a manner as I can, but my limit continues to deteriorate further each time. Quit being a prick by insulting those figures who matter to me, cause you know what that leads to. If morals apply without the implication of religion, then why are you constantly throwing yours aside to make rude comments with no consideration of their effect on others? I'm neither arrogant nor ignorant, you simply choose to ignore every legitimate reason I give for having faith and use the rest against me in anger. Our ability to rationalize is a test of our faith to God. Why would He allow those who believe into His kingdom when he knows that they would completely cast the very idea of him aside if they were not given proof of His existence? And enough with the simple-minded comments. You've surely already heard of His love, since you constantly mock Him for it. Why would He send a newborn to Hell if they've yet to even hear of His word and His existence? Those that the world was too impervious to inform of His message will obviously be admitted into Heaven for their own subject to neglect. And why do you think He longs for our acceptance of His existence? We're his children, just as we have our own. It's basic human emotion to feel sorrow when ignored by your own creations. It's obvious to anyone whose not so narrow-minded. Just as you said, you're not attempting to rationalize with religious people, merely criticize and insult them for believing what you find too unbelievable. Your reply to this, should you give one, will be evidence enough of that.
 
Last edited:

AP2k

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
5,089
Reaction score
523
My post.



your post.



That was personal there were no facts or explanation in that. you want me pissed off? fine. if you cant, or dont want a civil discussion, tell me.

I know I did grammer mistakes like didnt put a ' in my dont, and misspelled grammar again so no need to point that out. so... you want to do it politely or not?U_U

I wrote that post AFTER you decided that your pre conceived thoughts on a religion are more important then what it actually is.
 

toothpaste

Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
68
Reaction score
3
Every single time you post, I try to reply in as polite a manner as I can, but my limit continues to deteriorate further each time. Quit being a prick by insulting those figures who matter to me, cause you know what that leads to. If morals apply without the implication of religion, then why are you constantly throwing yours aside to make rude comments with no consideration of their effect on others? I'm neither arrogant nor ignorant, you simply choose to ignore every legitimate reason I give for having faith and use the rest against me in anger. Our ability to rationalize is a test of our faith to God. Why would He allow those who believe into His kingdom when he knows that they would completely cast the very idea of him aside if they were not given proof of His existence? And enough with the simple-minded comments. You've surely already heard of His love, since you constantly mock Him for it. Why would He send a newborn to Hell if they've yet to even hear of His word and His existence? Those that the world was too impervious to inform of His message will obviously be admitted into Heaven for their own subject to neglect. And why do you think He longs for our acceptance of His existence? We're his children, just we have our own. It's basic human emotion to feel sorrow when ignored by your own creations. It's obvious to anyone whose not so narrow-minded. Just as you said, you're not attempting to rationalize with religious people, merely criticize and insult them for believing what you find too unbelievable. Your reply to this, should you give one, will be evidence enough of that.

so what if you feel insulted? however, i am not insulting you. i am criticizing your ideas. do you feel insulted when someone dislikes your fondness of naruto? if ideas cannot stand criticism there is something wrong.

"Our ability to rationalize is a test of our faith to God."
your god gives us this ability to think but when we use it, god condemns us.
what type of love is that? that is not love. that is abuse.

"And why do you think He longs for our acceptance of His existence?"
read the first commandment.

"Why would He send a newborn to Hell if they've yet to even hear of His word and His existence?"
jesus died for them too implying they had sin.

jesus said you must hate everyone except him to become his disciple. do you believe in this too?
 
Last edited:
Top