[Discussion] Do You Agree Diversity Is Code Language For ''Anti White''?

[Luther]

The term diversity refers to the the quality or state of having many different forms, types, ideas as well as having different types of races, religions and culture being present. Some argue that this term ''diversity'' is a dog whistle for anti white and that diversity is not good. Do you believe that? Do you agree with the notion that diversity in terms of inclusion is code word for anti white? Do you believe that diversity being imposed on a majority Caucasian country ie germany or france by immigrants from syria and sub saharan africa is bad?

 

[V h o]

I don't understand how it could mean anti white, seems weird. Although diversity does cause issues, people don't always mix easily, and often get into conflicts based on these differences, so I can't fault a country for trying to maintain its homogeneity.

 

[Joshutsu]

It is one of the things that make a diverse population. This shouldn't even be much of a debate. When different races can co exist in whatever way it's a diverse setting.

 

[InfiniteMugen]

Wouldn't anyone thinking diversity is anti white be pro white by nature? Diversity in itself takes nothing away from any race it's just a diverse mix of races(which honestly is in no way a bad thing)

 

[Urda]

No, I think those who reject diversity are bigots.

 

[sasukesworld]

It is Anti White.
Why?
Because diversity only happens in White countries.
Nowhere else it is promoted like in Western countries.

Now with all the refugees more and more non-white people are entering our countries.
Whites are the minority worldwide, but only we have to suffer from diversity.
Illegals are everywhere in for example America, and now Illegals known as refugees are entering our Western countries like there's no tomorrow.
Only because they're too lazy to work and build up their own functional country. Pathetic.

But the time has come to change that.

 

[demon of the leaf]

I never heard of that the only thing i would consider anti white is white privilage as a code for anti white

 

[InfiniteMugen]

It is Anti White.
Why?
Because diversity only happens in White countries.
Nowhere else it is promoted like in Western countries.

Now with all the refugees more and more non-white people are entering our countries.
Whites are the minority worldwide, but only we have to suffer from diversity.
Illegals are everywhere in for example America, and now Illegals known as refugees are entering our Western countries like there's no tomorrow.
Only because they're too lazy to work and build up their own functional country. Pathetic.

But the time has come to change that.

Diversity only happens in white countries cause other countries are already diverse no? Technically this country was stolen by whites to begin with. Complaining about other races trying to be here seems.... Ignorant?

 

[Flakez]

Do you believe that diversity being imposed on a majority Caucasian country ie germany or france by immigrants from syria and sub saharan africa is bad?

Yes it is. Especially since it's also clearly harmful.

 

[YowYan]

That doesn't make much sense to me.

 

[Punk Hazard]

It is Anti White.
Why?
Because diversity only happens in White countries.
Nowhere else it is promoted like in Western countries.

Now with all the refugees more and more non-white people are entering our countries.
Whites are the minority worldwide, but only we have to suffer from diversity.
Illegals are everywhere in for example America, and now Illegals known as refugees are entering our Western countries like there's no tomorrow.
Only because they're too lazy to work and build up their own functional country. Pathetic.

But the time has come to change that.

How often were white people systematically oppressed worldwide? The relevance of this is that I'm pretty sure that, for the most part, white populations weren't suppressed throughout the world the way whites have done with instruments like slavery and systematic oppression. I've never heard of Japan or China being vehemently against white populations, while you always hear white people complaining about non-white populations being among them. Good example: You.

 

[Marin]

... no

 

[Bling Kai]

It is Anti White.
Why?
Because diversity only happens in White countries.
Nowhere else it is promoted like in Western countries.

Now with all the refugees more and more non-white people are entering our countries.
Whites are the minority worldwide, but only we have to suffer from diversity.
Illegals are everywhere in for example America, and now Illegals known as refugees are entering our Western countries like there's no tomorrow.
Only because they're too lazy to work and build up their own functional country. Pathetic.

But the time has come to change that.

And the dumbest post of the day goes too.............

 

[Edogawa]

Because diversity only happens in White countries.
Nowhere else it is promoted like in Western countries.

Gulf States and India all have greater rate of diversity than Europe.

Diversity is a result of international dependence on countries in realm of economy. Diverse countries import skilled-full workers for long-term economic growth. Diversity is also for society because it unites ethnics, religion and culture together.

United States is the most diverse country but also the most successful one.

 

[chopstickchakra]

The term diversity refers to the the quality or state of having many different forms, types, ideas as well as having different types of races, religions and culture being present. Some argue that this term ''diversity'' is a dog whistle for anti white and that diversity is not good. Do you believe that? Do you agree with the notion that diversity in terms of inclusion is code word for anti white? Do you believe that diversity being imposed on a majority Caucasian country ie germany or france by immigrants from syria and sub saharan africa is bad?

At it's root no it doesn't but it does seem to be being used by people with an apparent anti white agenda. Also forced diversity will only result in conflict, racial tension and aggression.

 

[Luther]

Wouldn't anyone thinking diversity is anti white be pro white by nature? Diversity in itself takes nothing away from any race it's just a diverse mix of races(which honestly is in no way a bad thing)

Not necessarily, being a white supremacist and wanting your country to remain homogeneous and to still have certain unique cultures and practices isn't a problem. An argument can be made that it isnt an either/or situation.

I don't understand how it could mean anti white, seems weird. Although diversity does cause issues, people don't always mix easily, and often get into conflicts based on these differences, so I can't fault a country for trying to maintain its homogeneity.

True,but i can fault them for having an extreme nationalist view of the world.

It is one of the things that make a diverse population. This shouldn't even be much of a debate. When different races can co exist in whatever way it's a diverse setting.

The issue we are discussing is if diversity is a burden or not, and should europe look like people from all around the world or just its main citizens which are Caucasians.

No, I think those who reject diversity are bigots.

Debatable, care to expatiate more?

It is Anti White.
Why?
Because diversity only happens in White countries.
Nowhere else it is promoted like in Western countries.

Now with all the refugees more and more non-white people are entering our countries.
Whites are the minority worldwide, but only we have to suffer from diversity.
Illegals are everywhere in for example America, and now Illegals known as refugees are entering our Western countries like there's no tomorrow.
Only because they're too lazy to work and build up their own functional country. Pathetic.

But the time has come to change that.

Yet it is predominantly whites that invaded african countries and turned them into slaves, and sold them to different countries and also colonized them. Did they ask for that? Also there has been a zero net immigration from mexico to the usa.

I never heard of that the only thing i would consider anti white is white privilage as a code for anti white

I disagree, white privilege is not being political correct, it is being brutally honest and saying that whites compared to other minority groups are given the benefit of the doubt and minorites are not.

Yes it is. Especially since it's also clearly harmful.

Wrong. Harmful in what way?

How often were white people systematically oppressed worldwide? The relevance of this is that I'm pretty sure that, for the most part, white populations weren't suppressed throughout the world the way whites have done with instruments like slavery and systematic oppression. I've never heard of Japan or China being vehemently against white populations, while you always hear white people complaining about non-white populations
being among them. Good example: You.

It comes from a sense of entitlement and superiority complex, the usa had slavery for many years and bought blacks from africa into their country, now how can you tell african americans to go back to africa when it is whites who brought them to the U.S in the first place?

... no

Why?

 

[Marin]

Why?

You tell me why it is.

 

[InfiniteMugen]

Not necessarily, being a white supremacist and wanting your country to remain homogeneous and to still have certain unique cultures and practices isn't a problem. An argument can be made that it isnt an either/or situation.


True,but i can fault them for having an extreme nationalist view of the world.


The issue we are discussing is if diversity is a burden or not, and should europe look like people from all around the world or just its main citizens which are Caucasians.


Debatable, care to expatiate more?


Yet it is predominantly whites that invaded african countries and turned them into slaves, and sold them to different countries and also colonized them. Did they ask for that? Also there has been a zero net immigration from mexico to the usa.

I disagree, white privilege is not being political correct, it is being brutally honest and saying that whites compared to other minority groups are given the benefit of the doubt and minorites are not.

Wrong. Harmful in what way?


It comes from a sense of entitlement and superiority complex, the usa had slavery for many years and bought blacks from africa into their country, now how can you tell african americans to go back to africa when it is whites who brought them to the U.S in the first place?


Why?

You have a point here. But being a white supremacist and wanting certain unique cultures is hypocrisy imo. you can't just want the people to leave but their cultures to stay. And honestly there's way too many different cultures to expect a country(like say America) to NOT be diverse. Although I get what your saying a little more in op now. As I can see a lot of whites that want a certain thing to see "diversity" introduced in their "community" or whatever as anti white. But that in itself is racist. No ones using it as an anti white term. Just a term for the country in general. Honestly if people see it as an anti white statement it only points to more problems within the way those people think. I can see how a originally mainly white colonized country would see it as anti white, but the country was never theirs to begin with. It was stolen from an entirely different race here. It's like the pot calling the kettle black "we're taking this country and making our ways absolut" and then mad cause other races want to join(not take over) them( I only use America as an example cause that's where I live) and I'm not attempting to bash anyone, just my personal pov

 

[V h o]

True,but i can fault them for having an extreme nationalist view of the world.

Why do you believe they have extreme nationalist view of the world?

 

[Flakez]

Wrong. Harmful in what way?

Refugees don't exactly have the best track record, and as someone from Europe I can tell you people don't want these people in their countries.