To be fair
- Vergo's haki is featless too since his only 'haki feat' is to be superior to Smoker's featless haki
- Burgess' haki is featless besides being inferior to Sabo's featless haki
- Sabo's haki is featless besides being superior to Burgess' featless haki
- Fujitora's haki is featless too
And so on and so on...
The difference is Smoker's haki was enough to parry against Law not to mention knock Vergo off his feat which as we seen Sanji's kicks were unable to.
He has not feats it means that the level of his haki can't be determined not that it is automatically weaker. I don't get the logic behind your reasoning at all. For all we know his haki is weaker than Zoro as it was overpowered by him.
My logic is you can't assume someone's haki is of a similar level of someone else unless they have similar feats to do so. We
do know Pica's haki is weaker than Zoro's it's a fact however the argument isn't surrounding Zoro it's Vergo. Fact is Pica has shown no Haki feats to compare his haki level with Vergo's. Pica's haki is about as good as Boo's they're both featless.
No one said that it was proven to be equal. It doesn't matter if haki isn't his expertise. It does not imply that his haki is weaker than someone else. It simply means that he has batter mastery over fruit than haki. Besides mostly using DF doesn't mean that his best form of offence is DF. I am pretty sure about Pica being more confidant about his haki than his fruit which means that his mastery over his haki is better than that of his fruit.
Not really using Haki as a last resort does not show confidence in his haki. Fighting for over 1 hour using a devil fruit is confidence. You're stretching your arguments to make Pica look stronger in haki when in fact your argument is based on the logic = We didn't see his haki enough it 'could' be stronger. The problem is you're actually trying to pass it off as a legitimate base for your argument.
I wasn't offering anything if you actually try to understand my post. And no it wasn't based on facts, the opinion was built on assumptions.
I do understand your post. Fact is Pica hasn't shown feats in haki to show he's as good as 'you' think he is.
Yup,it proves that people with DF can have better haki than people without fruits which makes your whole Pica's haki should be weaker than Vergo's haki because he relies mostly on his fruit argument useless.
I never argued it didn't. I never said Pica's haki is weaker because he relies on a DF however it's a contributing factor to points towards what I said. Also using Luffy and Pica is a bad example Luffy's fighting style relies on haki while Pica's does not.
What are these so called feats of Vergo again? Breaking through Smokers haki? What makes Smokers haki so great to think that Vergo's haki is certainly stronger than Pica's?
Smoker's haki was good enough to battle Law not to mention knock Vergo around who we seen was able to tank Law's and Sanji's attacks.
Vergo's Haki feats -
- Knocking Law out with one hit.
- Blocking a haki users sword with his haki
- Snapping Smoker's Haki Jitte with a Haki Bamboo stick
Pica's Haki feats -
-...None.
About portrayal Pica hyped his haki to be able tank mountain level attacks yet he was trashed by Zoro just like how Vergo ended up against Law so I don't see any difference here.
Pica 'hyped' his own abilities how many bad guys have done that...no one else hyped his haki.
Now let's look at Vergo...Caesar and Doflamingo hyped Vergo's haki.
Difference is Law pulled his feat off against a haki user who was acknowledged for his haki capabilities by other people while Zoro pulled off his feat against someone who hyped his own haki...
know that an educated opinion is better which is why I stick with the fact that the question remains unanswered as that's what everything we have seen so far suggests.
A fact is something we have seen and can be proven a question that remains unanswered is open to speculation however at the end of the day without any facts to back it up it will ultimately remain an opinion.
Yup, that's why I said that the question remains unanswered. Pica's haki level can't be determined from what we have seen which means that his haki can be either weaker or stronger not just weaker.
About portrayal Vergo was introduced as a main arc villian where as Pica was introduced along with top tiers which is why he can't get as much attention as Vergo did. Once again it was an educated opinion but far from being a fact.
Yeah we can, from what we seen Pica's haki hasn't proven to be better than Vergo's or even close. So...that makes no sense the fact that Vergo was highlighted as a main villain in an arc and Pica wasn't suggests Vergo's superiority if anything.