yes but ignore the fact that ancient civilizations around the world have depicted dinosaurs and depicted people living with them. the pictures and scuptures are undeniably dinosaurs, and there fossils of dinos and humans together. thats fact, its not a theory or conspiracy, its fact that there re fossils that had both dino and human remains.Say this all to the Academic community : Proffesors , Doctors = PPL = who have researched the subject for 30+ years and they all say = this :
Dinosaurs are a diverse group of animals of the clade Dinosauria. They first appeared during the Triassic period, approximately 230 million years ago, and became the dominant terrestrial vertebrates for 135 million years, from the beginning of the Jurassic (about 200 million years ago) until the end of the Cretaceous (65.5 million years ago), when the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event led to the extinction of most dinosaur groups at the close of the Mesozoic era. The fossil record indicates that birds evolved from theropod dinosaurs during the Jurassic, and consequently they are considered a type of dinosaur in modern classification systems.[1][2] Some birds survived the extinction event that occurred 65 million years ago, and continue the dinosaur lineage to the present day.
Humans do not have co excited with Dinosaurs : All of this BS on the internet is made up by evangelical book of genesis readers = creationists ( not very intelligent people).
Do not believe/support the ideas of people who dismiss science as its whole.
The process of Evolution is 100% correct and has been proven.
but why are those ignored by you? if i could talked to a scientist, i'd ask them the same thing.
none of the internet stuff is bs or made up, they provided artifacts. they are remains of the past. and its up to us to interpret the vaild reasons behind why the Incas had pictures of dinosaurs, or why the egyptians had pictures of dinosaurs, or why there are legends around the world of dragons, or why there are footprints of humans and dinos, or why there has been accounts and witnessing reports of the loch ness monster, creatures that resemble pleisosaurs and creatures that resemble pterodactyls, from people of reputable and credible backgrounds, why? and you ignore the artifacts and stick to the lie that has been given to you that you came from a monkey.
evolution itself is not scientific, never has been proven fact and can never will, because evolution claims things evolve in a timespan of billions and millions of years, but no one can observe that or claim it to be true, it is not and cannot be experimented on, it is not scientific because it cant be proven using the basic scientific method.
"Scientific method is a body of techniques for investigating phenomena, acquiring new knowledge, or correcting and integrating previous knowledge.[1] To be termed scientific, a method of inquiry must be based on empirical and measurable evidence subject to specific principles of reasoning.[2] The Oxford English Dictionary says that scientific method is: "a method or procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses."[3]"
evolution cannot be observed, measured, experimented or measured for realibility. cannot be tested by the scienific method, which is used to term things scientific. to call evolution scientific is an oxymoron itself.
i just made you aware. if you dont believe me then look it up for yourself, you choose to be ignorant? its easy to just believe what you are told and not find answers for yourself isnt it?One of your argument is old cave paintings depicting Dinosaurs with humans. Although there are no such paintings i am aware of but still i'll assume you are right.That proves nothing. I've sen cave paintings depicting people slaying dragons, lifting mountains, growing wings, levitating and defying many other laws of physics and nature. Does that mean anything ? No,of course not.Ever heard about Ajanta caves ? That place is full of ancient paintings and many of them are screwed up.
Ajanta caves have nothing to do with this, stick to the point. and did you not read my point on the dragons thing? did you read this thread at all? dragons are the name of dinosaurs of the past.
look up what an "ad hominem"That's quite laughable considering how nonsensical your claim is that you'd call me ignorant for pointing out the facts. Suit yourself, bro keep believing dinos and man co existed, and showing pictures from religious sites that claim to prove it. Despite having all the evidence thrown at your face, if your still dumb enough to believe that dinos and man lived at the same time, then there's nothing i can do to help you, i'm afraid.
Erm, and if you take an absolutely literal interpretation of everything Genesis says, then you believe that there is a giant ocean(water vault) above the sky as well:
You must be registered for see links
just becuse they are from religious sites and religious people does not make them false or invalid. they presented artifacts, they presented evidence that suggest dinos lived with man and you ignore them just because it came from religious people? you are a fool and ignorant for doing so. i dont buy into evolution but it doesnt mean i hate science, doesnt mean i dont agree with physicsor chemistry or biology, in fact i love science and all those things.
you want something scientific? eplain to me how is it possible for a t rex fossil to have tissue in it if its supposedly 65 millions years old?
you did not provide any evidence, you begged the question, said "well scientists say dinos are millions years old and never lived with man so its true", ignored what i said and just said "well its not true cuz it came from reliigous people" which s a fallacy, invalid arguement.
let m tell you this that the science has not always been right. you think im wrong because science of this age says evolution is true, even though it has never been proven and it cant be proven. there was a time when sientists believed that abiogenesis. during this time is when evolution came about from Darwin because abiogenesis was deemed to be a scientific thing. but abiogenesis has long been disproven and with that evolution should have as well because abiogenesis is the only way evolution could have been true.
if you dont know at all what im talking about then go educate yourself. and look into it.
and the water vault i the sky, well what is in the sky? clouds. dont clouds have water droplets or ice crystals? when it rains whats falling? water right? where does that water comes from the sky right? why? because theres water in the sky... right? plus the sky i blue which i believe is the reflection of the ocean right? so um maybe that explains why genesis describe the sky as a water vault.
yes, your arguements are ridiculous. you post a pic of a genius next to Sarah Palin and then thats supposed to prove your point? didnt you claim you were a scientist before and yet this is the best you can come up with an arguement? so you're saying evolutionists are so great because you post a pic of a satelite and Prof Hawkin and creationists are dumb by posting Palin?this is getting ridiculous so ill be ridiculous:
ppl who believe in evolution made
You must be registered for see images
and give us ppl like:
You must be registered for see images
creationists give us ppl like
You must be registered for see images
my point: the world of science (i.e. the smartest ppl) is largly dominated by evolutionists because they get evolution and see how creationists are desperately holding onto the bible
appeal to belief
appeal to authority
appeal to popularity
your point is invalid and fallacious
oh and fyi there are scientists who dont buy into evolution
Last edited: