theres nothing wrong taking literal interpretation of genesis. why is that an issue? its better then believing you came from a monkey that came from a fish that came from a rock.
i didnt post the link of bible.co but the sites have pics from bible.co because bible.co post evidence that suggest man lived with dinosaurs.
the vids also are full of evidence and give proof.
you are commiting the fallacy of dismissal and strawman. if you ignored that the links and vids are made from religious people then what you have is artifacts and exaplanations that suggest humans living with dinosaurs and dinosaurs not being 65 millions years old but only extinct for a few thousands of years. dont dismiss the links and vids just because the people believed in genesis. dont be that ignorant.
tell me why are you commiting the Red Herring fallacy?
this aint about aliens man.. trust me you should look into this.. btw i dont buy into aliens and stuff
look it up man, this was a controversal topic... but anyways any tissue should be impossible if its 65 millions years old...
nobody in this thread still hasnt addressed this.. i mean to answer and explain..
the foot prints was identical to that of a footprint of you and me...
You must be registered for see images
You must be registered for see images
why were there so many ancient civilizations that drew and carved dinosaurs and drew dinosaurs co existing with people?
um no.. you are being rude. like a typical member who is a noob or a troll. your not acting like a mod that should be respectful to members. just saying
im not talking about common sense or anything.. and common sense doesnt have anything to do with this. if you looked at the links and pics then you would see historical artifacts of human and dinosaurs fossils co existing. and the best you can say is that education is a wonderful thing? then get educated.
shady internet sites? do i have to name the fallacies being commited here?
the fact that crocodiles come from the dino era and still live with man while man evolving from apes to man makes not a gawd damn sense. if organisms are constantly changing and evolving then why did the crocs, sharks, and etc that came from the dino era just stopped evolving while apes were turning into man? but people buy into this shit and call creationists stupid.. smfh..
anyways the youtube moon thing is irrelevant and has nothing to do with the vids i posted. just because the moon thing comes from youtube and is bull doesnt mean the vids about dinosaurs co existing with man are bull.. you obviosuly didnt look at all the facts before commenting. look it up
i saw the link. there are other explanations to the stegosaur looking thing, but the poeple who saw it making it out of fossils or a chameleon is bullshit.. but it stills resembles a stego, even though there may be more explanations doesnt mean that the explanation that it was made from a dino is wrong. its still a valid explanation.
especially with added to ALL the other drawings and interpretations of dinosaurs in ancient artifacts around the world. again... around the world...
how do you go to a thread, do not read, and comment, revealing how ignorant you are?
read the previous posts