No, it means that when i ask people questions i expect answers from them not from , when you nose in to answer the question to give a self-meta answer you are doing three things:
1) You are sabotaging my game solving.
2) You are being disrespectful.
3) You look like you don’t want an answer from someone who knows you.
1) Ehh. I don't know many town players whose solving would be significantly sabotaged by anything I've said here.
2) That's fair. I can attempt to be more respectful. I apologize for the pressure I've placed on you. I know that when I believe I have a solution path, like most people, it can result in a degree of tunnel vision.
3) Oh, no, I welcome a Luk answer. My answer will have no impact on Luk's answer though.
And for the record, Im not saying that you two are scum together, for the simple reason that that is mechanically impossible. In a 10 players set up, there can only be two scum
3 scum in a 10 player setup is not at all unusual, though. If anything, 2 is a little low without a bit of an awkward power ratio. Standard town:scum ratios are between 22% and 33%.
one already died and the other one must be between you, rej and lukundo, but i highly doubt is Luku.
Also, i dont claim to know lukundo very well, i just think i know how he plays.
Then why are you so unwilling to consider Rej? You haven't talked about Rej all game. That action speaks quite loudly. Are you protecting Rej for some reason? If you're town, then you have no reason to do so here.
Also, you said you had collected info forming meta from multiple games. In context, I asked why you were so ready to townread Luk when you had never given a case. You were very certain about townreading Luk. Luk was not an option at all for your PoE.
Have i said that I refuse to give you reads? No.
Will i provide you reads just because you demand them? No.
It took multiple times of asking you for detail before you provided detail on one read. Even if you think I'm mafia, you cannot be 100% certain, so actively ignoring requests for detail implicitly states that you refuse to contribute to cooperation between players in the thread. That is anti-town behaviour.
I’m thunderdoming with you which is better than any read you can get from me, because it is based on thunderdomes that I resolve slots.
Is it based on thunderdomes that everyone resolves slots? Is it based on thunderdomes that you resolve slots or based on reading the reactions given in those thunderdomes?
I will give reads when I have them.
I look forward to it, given that if you can provide detailed reads during this day phase, and if you are correct that there is only 2 mafia (which I doubt, but it's possible), then we can quickly eliminate Rej and conclude the game!
So instead, you are trying to waste mine? Precisely me who does have limited time?
Im out
I made links to searches of each user's posts in order. I.e. exactly what one would use to read along. It doesn't take time to follow along post by post in the search. It takes a lot of time to make each post number into a link; this site doesn't have links by post position in the thread. Not to mention, you asked me specifically about the SK analysis. The SK analysis is literally just going post by post through SK's ISO and listing out the number of times each person's name comes up in SK's posts, including quoting people and excluding posts with 0 names, or every player's name. It's a very easy analysis to do on flipped mafia to see who they mention more or less often. When there's a disconnect, it means the players below the disconnect are more likely buddies than not.
