Search results

Vote probably the most unusual-acting player (Gutsy), and still being unable to say anything specific. Bounce.

Includes three more Townies. Bounce.

Towns Konno. Bounce.

Elmage voted Gutsy, never articulated a specific concern. The pressure on Gutsy was always performative, and the unvote confirms it.

Fraud says nothing.

Even if your thought is "I don't know," even if it's "I haven't looked closely," even if it's "he seems like LHF to me". You'd SAY SOMETHING.

There is zero probability that an active town player has NO thoughts about the primary lynch candidate.

He never mentions bitter in his reads. He never reacts to a bitter post. He never weighs in on the bitter wagon. He asks OTHER people what they think about bitter.

His read on bitter doesn't even exist.

Why them?

Us?

Why is he attacking Gutsy's right to have that concern and not the concern itself?

The reads list covers five players and omits the rest, including the most discussed person at the time (bitter/Cata/Dae).

But here is Daedalus in this reads list? Where is Brad? Where is Lucidus? Where is Gutsy?

Konno gets mentioned twice, but the reasoning is never articulated beyond vibes. Rej and Fujishiro appear in the list with zero prior engagement. The guy is just placing them.

Five reads. Three town leans. Two nulls. Zero scum leans.

But for the entirety of D1, he has not one suspect, not one case.

Why does this thought exist? What is the cognitive origin of "I don't scum-hunt D1"? From Town!Ace, the ostensible answer is efficiency. Wait for night info, then work backwards. Fine in theory.

Typed up a 4,500-word case for 2 hours straight after Daedalus died, so I'll just segment it here.

Vote lynch Elmage G Ace. One-sentence conviction. Should've went: Observation -> Reaction -> Post. The fact that he explicitly says "I'll have to go through his posts to confirm" while casting the vote proves he hasn't actually found the scum-tell yet.