Is Narutopedia credible?

[Freeworld]

Hey im new just asking i was there and they seemed to manipulate certain trans for some thing but when that trans goes against some thing they beileve on more as fanboys and fangirls they ignore it what do you guys think?

and i even saw this huge debate with this guy calling them out on it..

should you get info about chars from there?

or manga and databook only

 

[Swizzik]

Its probably the most credible source of all that is naruto besides these forums (Don't mind the nagato vs Itachi s@#$).

 

[Freeworld]

^are you sure cause they seem to show favortism to certain characters.

 

[Amanwithnoplan]

^are you sure cause they seem to show favortism to certain characters.

example?

 

[Sharingdork]

it is very credable; I edit it.

You must be registered for see images

 

[WastedMonkey]

yes it is

 

[Freeworld]

example?

well i was there dam some guy tryed to add somthing about how kabuto praised itachi shuriken skills right?

later another editor who i heard was biased came and deleted it and said he thinks the translator of *********** took liberties with the script.

And later he used the same script to and add to quotes to itachis profile which made no sense because he basiclly claimed the script was no good.

THIS IS CLEAR BIAS.

 

[Freeworld]

i hope people who are from the site to come in give bias replies

 

[Coyote]

I think it's a good site.

 

[Freeworld]

no diss respect to anybody who works there tho

 

[Kenpai]

Datebook is fan made....especially the stats..

 

[Freeworld]

Datebook is fan made....especially the stats..

WHAT?

 

[Avani]

Manga is the most reliable source..

Narutowiki etc are written by fans like us. They are good for quick references and a good source of information usually. But, if there is really a factual conflict go by what the manga says.

 

[Fiederson]

Hey im new just asking i was there and they seemed to manipulate certain trans for some thing but when that trans goes against some thing they beileve on more as fanboys and fangirls they ignore it what do you guys think?

and i even saw this huge debate with this guy calling them out on it..

should you get info about chars from there?

or manga and databook only

It's credible to me, a broad collection of all Naruto characters in details and Jutsu list in details.

 

[AKATSUKINAGATO]

useful

 

[JojocIaw]

Manga is the most reliable source..

Narutowiki etc are written by fans like us. They are good for quick references and a good source of information usually. But, if there is really a factual conflict go by what the manga says.

I would go with what this guy said.

Mange>Anime>Narutopedia

I use Narutopedia but when in doubt I look to the manga.

Tbh, I wish they had a dedicated staff instead of allowing just anyone to edit it. Would make more sense no?

 

[Freeworld]

thanks for the input

 

[Colour]

Yeh very reliable. You can get alot of details from it and plus shows lists of jutsus etc.

 

[Jack Spicer]

It's very useful on games and an interesting read.

 

[Nathan]

helpful. i like it.