Is Narutopedia credible?
- Thread starter Freeworld
- Start date
Ok so I'm guessing you believe in databook so I'm going to show you the logic of using databook and stats. Example:
Naruto most current stats are: 26 points...yeah
Kakashi: 34.5
There is no point system in Naruto. Where and how they judge skills are unknown to me. Again fan made.
By using the databook Kakashi will MOP the floor with Naruto.
In manga and anime kakashi said Naruto surpassed him already.
So...Manga>Anime>Narutopedia>Databook.
Narutopedia is only useful for information.
And if you think Kakashi can beat SM or kyuubi mode than I think you have a prob.
Reborn
Active member
Awards
Databooks aren't fan made, they're made by Kishi
You know that the last updated files on the stats of the characters like Naruto, Kakashi and Sasuke, haven't been updated since the last databook was made. Those stats cover from the beginning of Shippuden to apox 141 of the anime, at least that's what I herd, meaning, Naruto didn't have SM or KM, Sasuke just recieved his MS...so those were pretty accurate to what skills each character had at that time...
You must have known that my friend, have you ever really looked at them?
IMO, the most useful thing about Narutopedia is the references it makes to the manga. If I'm trying to find a particular chapter that had specific info on a certain character, I just wiki the character and search the page for what I'm looking for. It is very good at referencing important chapters on most characters.
Btw, what is the easiest way to gain access to the databooks? I've never really read them in their entirety because I didn't know where to go online to get them. Anyone know?
Btw, what is the easiest way to gain access to the databooks? I've never really read them in their entirety because I didn't know where to go online to get them. Anyone know?
