Aryan invasion theory was BS . Even it's supporters have changed it "Aryan Invasion theory " to "Aryan Migration Theory" because they couldn't back up the claim of "invasion". A lot more excavation has been done since the theory first came up. A lot more sites have been found since as well and the area of civilization was much wider than they first thought. River Saraswati's route is mapped. The topography and climate change made it disappear and that lead to decline of the Indus civilization in some areas but it's people and traditions survived. So there is less and less support for the original theory. Yes Arya does not denote any race and Aryan Dravidian divide is more of a political myth.
Thing is, that the topic is so much politicized and historians being political ideologists too, that we are no likely to ever have an definite answer... if such a thing is even possible.
Sanskrit is one of the most ancient languages. It's certainly the first one to get structured and definitive grammar back between 7th to 5 th century BCE. Panini who wrote treaties of the Sanskrit grammar has been considered the "first descriptive linguist", and even labelled as “the father of linguistics”. Most of the Indian languages have their roots from it. Yes, there are lots of linguistic connections and similarity of words around the world.
Similarities with several common words like Matri and mater, Pitri and Pater, Agni and Ignis etc exist and that similarity was the reason to start the study itself. Saying that:
# I do not see any connection of the word Kali with the word Caliphate. Caliphate comes from Khalif meaning successor and is a title for Islamic leader, as far as I know. Kali is feminine form of Kal (time), also called as Mahakali (Great Time). Mahakal, a form of Shiva, is Time personified. Time being ultimate destroyer and the force bringing changes in nature. She is also known as Kalratri (Time of night) or Karali(fierce one) and similar epithets and as one of the forms of Parvati/Gauri, concert of Shiva. Two words ( caliphate and Kali) are too distinct to make a linguistic connection.
# The word California comes from a Spanish Novel. While no one knows how the writer came up with it, the most likely originates from the word "Khalif" seeing Spain's history, and story of the novel itself. The queen Calafia is a Muslim, joins crussade and ends up converting to Christianity. Makes no sense to be connected to goddess Kali. The word is relatively modern in it's origin anyway.
# Curious as the shape of the frame maybe, Black stone in Kaba doesn't even seem to be in 7 but 9 pieces, in that picture.... Regardless, it's in pieces because it was damaged in some war between different faction in the region so they put it back that way as I read somewhere. Meaning it was not magically broken in 7 pieces due to some connection with Shiva. Number 7 is not particularly connected with Shiva either.
# The word Canada- again no. The word most likely originates from Kannata ( settlement/land):
You must be registered for see links
.
# Maya is not a concert of Shiva. It's a magical power of a sort and also an epithet for Goddess Lakshmi, concert of Vishnu.
# No, Krishna doesn't mean anointed one. Krishna is a reference to his dark skin tone. The phase of waning moon is call Krishna Paksh.
Christianity may have taken some tips from Budhists- there clergy system certainly seems to be inspired from it. And Ashoka is said to have sent Buddhist missionaries to Syria, Egypt and Greece beginning in 250 BCE.
You must be registered for see links
But that's that.
I'm no linguist and I do not have time to follow the whole video either. But this kind of mistakes jump out and that's why I said it's a stretch. Some of the claims can be validated but some other fall in to category of assumptions and leap of faith. And such random assertions hurt the whole argument in turn.
If you rely for alternate view there are better videos on the topic.
You must be registered for see medias