On the topic of X:
My main problem with X was, every point I would raise, he would remove context and address the version he created, rather than what I said. This is a textbook strawman. Example:
X has his reads, and two players are the same tier he himself is in. I ask why that is, hoping that he has some very good reasons to put them in a "lock town" tier (given he himself is in that one). His response: "why is it strange to put myself as town?"
Example:
"why is a reads list with no reasons the only thing you have done?"
Alice later does the same.
X - "why are you not calling out Alice" (ignoring that Alice has far more content than him)
I don't believe I was the best lynch from his perspective at all. He came short of calling my play actually scummy, and just that he hasn't seen it from me before. I don't know if it was frustration or opportunitism, but it was not a very rational move.
The one thing in his favour is if he had got my lynched, my flip would have reflected very poorly on him, and I'm not sure I see the scum motivation from him to do so. It could be he's trying to respond to my claims last game where I pointed out he tends to agree with what I say and buddy me when he's scum, but I don't know. I want to see his response here, without the threat of a lynch too so less pressure due to Luk.
Interesting night you had, eh?
You and I had a single exchange but somehow you're saying I'm straw manning every one of your arguments? You're way too smart to actually think I was reading two players at the same level as myself and I'm sure no one read my list and thought that other than you. And I asked you a legitimate question in regards to my concern that you were pouncing on me when the behavior you apparently pinged on that I exhibited had also been displayed in other players. You're exaggerating how much more content Alice has than me in this game, but what does that even matter? A reads list isn't based on that player's activity, it's based on what you've read and what you've seen. So how on earth are you trying to discredit my reads list or find something scummy about it yet you didn't call out Alice for her reads list? The fact of the matter is that I've been reading and paying attention to this game just as well as anyone, I just haven't been as vocal as I was last game.
And how could you determine my perspective if I supposedly don't have that much content? There's a reason why I took my time voting for you, because I was still watching the game unfold. From the time I made my reads list, to the time I cast my vote, there was more than ample time to alter how I felt about the game. I also find it hilarious that you call my move irrational considering you weren't even around for most of D1 yet can still say with accuracy how I'm thinking about this game.
This is a bad paragraph right here. If I was scum, how on earth would I know what your role is in D1? So for your flip to reflect poorly on me just isn't something that I would have known one way or another. This is also a false representation of how I play as scum and with this being the final thing you said in this paragraph, it really takes away from you trying to give me a point in my favor, no?
Vote @Toujo
I hope everyone finds some time to read this post over. I am of the mind that Ratchet is attempting a smear campaign on me in order to set me up as a lynch down the road. However, my conviction of this isn't simply in his play, and I know that he is one hundred percent anti-town.