Sounds like the raunixy swat I know.If you're talking about me, I always have this thread open on a second monitor while I play other games
I agree with @Alice in Noodleland a Lynch is a wise idea on D1. Doing otherwise just helps scum.
Sounds like the raunixy swat I know.If you're talking about me, I always have this thread open on a second monitor while I play other games
hang on, are you... krogo?Sounds like the raunixy swat I know.
I agree with @Alice in Noodleland a Lynch is a wise idea on D1. Doing otherwise just helps scum.
In one guess! How'd you know?hang on, are you... krogo?
Are views really that relevant?Good morning, riae and shine!
Poison Chan didn't mentioned all the thread viwers that I alyas see and it's adding others. That's suspicious for me.
Not really relevantAre views really that relevant?
No, but her post is, at least for me. I didn't say any name but she said too many and one less. I'm waiting to see more before I vote.Are views really that relevant?
All I could think of about it is a massive stretch then to find someone suspicious.Not really relevant
Sorry I couldn't understand what you were saying.Good morning, riae and shine!
Poison Chan didn't mentioned all the thread viwers that I alyas see and it's adding others. That's suspicious for me.
I think the problem is not who is the viewer but someone who viewing the thread but posting less or not really helping post. Many dangerous indies or scums can be found here.All I could think of about it is a massive stretch then to find someone suspicious.
Exactly my point.I think the problem is not who is the viewer but someone who viewing the thread but posting less or not really helping post. Many dangerous indies or scums can be found here.
I am appologising for my english. I see some members in the bottom of the page. You posted them like I see them, but added two inactives and didn't mention one. I wish to know if that one it's really just inactive or scummy lurkers.Sorry I couldn't understand what you were saying.
No it's not like that I know his role or something, it's just that I am not sure if that person is really worth mentioning, since I see him/her sometimes when I check the msgs but he/she doesn't reply, but again, they don't appear. So I think I'll check for some more time then make him/her suspect.I am appologising for my english. I see some members in the bottom of the page. You posted them like I see them, but added two inactives and didn't mention one. I wish to know if that one it's really just inactive or scummy lurkers.
And if you didn't mention him on purpose it's maybe you know his role. And we know who knows the other roles.
I seeNo it's not like that I know his role or something, it's just that I am not sure if that person is really worth mentioning, since I see him/her sometimes when I check the msgs but he/she doesn't reply, but again, they don't appear. So I think I'll check for some more time then make him/her suspect.
And how much time left though?
You'll have to read through eventually.I don't even know who has or who hasn't posted @.@ Is there a way of checking or do you have to go through the 5 pages?
hang on, are you... krogo?
Fancy seeing you here Krog (hopes it's the same Krog from OJ)one guess! How'd you know?
It's krogowolf from the assassina games server ^o^ (I think... pretty sure)Fancy seeing you here Krog (hopes it's the same Krog from OJ)
You're the only wolf I knowIn one guess! How'd you know?
She's playing like in the first game we played in my opinionGood morning, riae and shine!
Poison Chan didn't mentioned all the thread viwers that I alyas see and it's adding others. That's suspicious for me.