It doesn't. Asking a simple question of whether I believe or not has got nothing to do with religion myths.
I was making an analogy of your reasoning of why God should exist, and I compared your logic to various religious beliefs that were debunked but had the same rationale as you do now.
And where did Particle physics and cosmic inflation come from? The cycle of questioning continues.
Science doesn't work that way. What science does is explain of things either by experiments or observation, none of which discredit God's existence. There are plenty of concrete proof regarding God's existence. You could look it up.
Well, we don't know where they came from, but saying it came from "God" is a baseless assumption. You have no evidence for it, yet you're saying it's God because in your mind it can't be anything else. This goes back to my analogy. People used to think that the sun couldn't be anything else but a God, but eventually they discovered that the Sun was actually just a sphere of hot plasma.
What science does is prove that the universe that we know of doesn't need God as a factor to explain how it works. The more we learn, the less of "God" is needed to explain things and it's been in that trend since science was conceived.
Oh trust me I have. I used to hold a very firm belief in the existence of God.
If there was concrete proof, there would be a stronger argument for God, but instead the idea of God existing has been diminishing over time and less people believe in a God(s) existence. So if you have "concrete" evidence for God's existence, then it would be a revolutionary discovery.
A God who is not affected by matter, space and time he created is one and eternal.
In other words, you believe in luck occurrences? Because that's what you're saying, and. Well, first of all, random occurrences do not and never will exist speaking scientifically. Matter exists because of space and time; space needs time and matter and time needs space and matter for all of them to form a physical thing instantly. This is physics fundamentals. It's ironic you laugh at the idea God is eternal, but you have faith in random occurrences.
No, Lightbringer. There are no concrete theories that explain the Big Bang prior events. Something being called a theory does not make it one, regardless if mainstream science accepts it or not. Science doesn't function that way. Science only explains observation and experimentation, and those theories don't do neither of that, meaning they are based on faith. So if you believe those theories, you believe them out of faith just like me believing in God out of faith, and just like religion.
But again, how do you know this? How do know what God is and isn't affected by or that there is one? Where is your tangible evidence to believe this?
Never said that theory was concrete, but theories, unlike faith have a foundation. There is observable evidence which scientists used to form a hypothesis and test to become a theory. You can't observe nor test God.
So no, I don't have "faith" in random occurrences. I understand that these theories are still early in their attempt to explain what came before the Big Bang, but it is once again based from observable and testable evidence. It's not faith, it's science and I'm merely relaying to you what science suggests could have happened, not what indisputably happened as fact, which is ironic because you are indisputably arguing that God is a fact.
The comparison between scientific understanding and religious belief is a false equivalence.
You asked why can't the universe be eternal like God Almighty? Because the universe is composed matter, space and time which all three must come together instantly to exist. Matter is not eternal, neither space or time are. It doesn't work in the laws of physics.
I didn't ask that. I asked how do you know God exists and that he is eternal? What intimate knowledge do you have that describes God's attributes?
Not sure I understand how this proves the existence of God. If God is not matter, doesn't need space, nor time to exist. Then how does he exist and what is he composed of? Is he just nothingness?
Well, there is nothing wrong with not knowing but having faith, since every person has faith in something.
Rest of the planets are the reason why earth hasn't been wiped out by big asteroids. That's one reason. God could have created other inhabited planets as sign of his power for humans. So like I said, there is divine wisdom humans could never comprehend and asking things you can't comprehend is a waste of time.
@Bold: Not sure how true that statement is.
So why would God create asteroids that threaten Earth and then create Planets to protect Earth?
If God wanted to create a sign of his power, then why not just make a direct demonstration of his power?
Saying there is divine wisdom on illogical things doesn't make it so. It's just a convenient justification for something making no sense as a way to explain God still exists.