I do. The only ones who don't know what I am talking about are you believers.
You must be registered for see images
It appears you really are oblivious to the stupidity of your remark. Allow me to explain as simple as possible. You called religion a fan fic. This statement however is erroneous because of both what religion and fiction are. Let's go through some basic education shall we?
"Fiction is the classification for any story created in the imagination,[1][2] rather than based strictly on history or fact.[3][note 1]"
"Religion is a cultural system of behaviors and practices, world views, sacred texts, holy places, ethics, and societal organisation that relate humanity to what an anthropologist has called "an order of existence".[1] "
Now, while your error may already be clear, your track record makes me assume that you still haven't comprehended the message I'm trying to convey so to put it simply:
Fiction - stories, songs, media in general which is openly based on that which isn't real
Religion - system of beliefs, morals, practices and behaviour in general
Now, yes, yes "poor Dannie-chan was talking about the scripts these religions are centered on rather than the actual belief systems therefore you're falsely accusing him". Well, poor Dannie is wrong about that too. For a fiction, in textual criticism, is defined as that which is openly not based on reality from the point of a writer, in contrast sacred scriptures are (atleast in the largest religions today) not solely of one nature. They range from historical to poetic and as such the texts the religions are based on could hardly be called fictional, especially since the authors deemed them to be reality.
Therefore the only proper term, in the worst case scenario of religion indeed being false, is a historical/cultural fabrication or non-fiction.
"Nonfiction or non-fiction is content (often, in the form of a story) whose creator, in good faith, assumes responsibility for the truth or accuracy of the events, people, and/or information presented."
Thus this statement was nothing more but a petty childish insult which can only be a product of a just as petty childish mind. Though, even if I were wrong here, the immaturity of this user is apparent in his every performance as they'd much rather preffer throwing memes and insults than saying something meaningful to the discussion all while giving a proper dose of destructive behaviour towards all those who disagree with him (bigotry is the term I believe), as is the case here:
You must be registered for see images
Hate to break it to you Dannie, but I don't go around insulting others for holding a different worldview or negging them for pointing out the fallacies in my logic. I'm simply here to have a fun discussion, but I gotta say you've proven yourself to be quite entertaining as I wouldn't be making this post as a sign of my gratitude. One can only hope tho, that one day you outgrow this phase and start acting in atleast somewhat more mature manner. (Especially if you're going to criticise other's lack of maturity)
