are terrorists really muslims??

[Dark Sonic]

My theory is that ISIS was invented by America or someone who was against America and they use it to get rid of Islam

I believe there must eb a reason why often muslims got attacked in the past and now there is all War

Probay someone is manipulating something there

America basically wants to "modernize" Islam and claims Sharia Law as Radical. Like they're any different. If the Muslims, namely the Arabs just stick together, they wouldn't let things like this happen to them.

 

[Izou Xaxa]

America basically wants to "modernize" Islam and claims Sharia Law as Radical. Like they're any different. If the Muslims, namely the Arabs just stick together, they wouldn't let things like this happen to them.

That is true but ufortuantely as things currently stand no peace is in sight.....what a bad thing really

 

[Kamishiro]

Terrorism has no religion. It is stupid, however, to claim that a specific religion means terrorism just because a group like ISIS does what it does. Terrorist have no religion what so ever even if they claim to just because no religion encourages it and I am pretty sure every single religion prohibits it.

 

[Dark Sonic]

Terrorism has no religion. It is stupid, however, to claim that a specific religion means terrorism just because a group like ISIS does what it does. Terrorist have no religion what so ever even if they claim to just because no religion encourages it and I am pretty sure every single religion prohibits it.

Otherwise, Christians would be generalized as the KKK and we know there would be heavy protests. They don't want the shoe on the other foot basically.

 

[Natsu Shazneel]

Giving Isis the title of Islam is doing exactly what they want. People don't realize this when they give them that title.

 

[supasaiyajingoddo]

H

Humans in general do stupid shit all the time, and of course as for your question, the answers varies based on what group/person you're talking about.

Though in most cases, you have one retarded fellow>that misinterprets the messages behind an old book>they get motivated and pushed somehow> and BOMB! You got it right there.


OT: No they aren't. They just seem to get noticed more apparently

Accurately explained. They are misguided people who misinterpret the teachings of the Qur'an.

 

[Aim64C]

from what i can tell so far from your past posts your not.

Perhaps they don't teach this to peaceful muslims - but I know how to do this thing called "read."

It's fascinating when you read things and try to figure out what all of the patterns of scribbling and words is supposed to represent. To my surprise - I found that 'language' - particularly the written variety - means something.

If someone is killed then that person's family has the right by law to kill that person as well (they way he killed that family member) or he pays a hefty fine, it depends on what the family chooses.

Yes, that ayah is used from time to time to justify the fatwas regarding honor killings.

And do not kill the soul which Allah has forbidden, except by right. And whoever is killed unjustly - We have given his heir authority, but let him not exceed limits in [the matter of] taking life. Indeed, he has been supported [by the law].

The first phrase and preparatory in nature. Do not kill people from among the category of people forbidden to kill. Implied in the arabic is that there are those who muslims are permitted to kill.

There is an addendum to that preparatory phrase - except by right. This is establishing that one can have the right to kill from among those who are typically forbidden. There is an exemption to the protected status.

The rest of it essentially defines the exemption and describes it - explains when and how one may go about killing one of the people who is normally forbidden.

isis = israel secret intelligent service.

Here, I've already done the homework for you:

You must be registered for see links

Now, if you want to think Israel is some kind of mastermind in all of that - that's just your problem. A bullet will eventually conduct the lobotomy you've already administered to yourself if so.

So for you every Muslim are doing the Charia ?

The only debate is exactly -what- falls under the laws of Sharia, since the Qu'ran is a convoluted mess and the Hadith only add to the complexity of attempting to 'go to the prophet in regards to what differs between you.'

Frankly, you -can't- consider yourself a Muslim if you do not believe in the application of Sharia, or at least Qu'ranic Law. Islam must be dominant over, at the very least, the Muslim Community - and a proper society has Muslims within a ruling caste over non-muslims.

The reason why this is -absolute- within Islam is because the entire premise of Islam is that Muhammad was revealed the 'book of truth' from God. The verses of the Qu'ran are not the words of a prophet so much as they are direct mandates and dictations from God - as is claimed by the Qu'ran and as is the founding principle of Islamic theology.

If you do not believe the qu'ran to be the literal wisdom of god and to be a system commanded to be implemented... then, frankly, you don't believe Muhammad was 'rightly guided.' If you don't believe that - then you essentially can't believe the qu'ran. If you look at the qu'ran with skepticism and with the belief that it should be modified or its policies abridged - then you're not a believer and therefor not a muslim.

It isn't like Christianity, where you can accept the Bible as an account written by man and therefor draw inspiration from its message or use historical context within the interpretation of stated laws or commands.

The very concept of the Qu'ran is, itself, absolute. It's an all or nothing book.

Just because I believe Muhammad was, at best, schizophrenic or at worst a demon in his own right does not mean I can't understand nor argue from the perspective of someone who does believe the Qur'an to be the literal wisdom of God.

Terrorism doesn't have any religions

So, if I were to create a religion dedicated to purging the world of other religions and breeding women among warriors to spawn the next generation of warriors....

I have not created a religion based upon terrorism?

While terrorism is, itself, a concept and thus beholden to no religion or demographic in particular - terrorism is a concept that can be incorporated into religions as a matter of course.

 

[nefraiko]

I'm sorry for your loss.



Perhaps they don't teach this to peaceful muslims - but I know how to do this thing called "read."

It's fascinating when you read things and try to figure out what all of the patterns of scribbling and words is supposed to represent. To my surprise - I found that 'language' - particularly the written variety - means something.



Yes, that ayah is used from time to time to justify the fatwas regarding honor killings.

And do not kill the soul which Allah has forbidden, except by right. And whoever is killed unjustly - We have given his heir authority, but let him not exceed limits in [the matter of] taking life. Indeed, he has been supported [by the law].

The first phrase and preparatory in nature. Do not kill people from among the category of people forbidden to kill. Implied in the arabic is that there are those who muslims are permitted to kill.

There is an addendum to that preparatory phrase - except by right. This is establishing that one can have the right to kill from among those who are typically forbidden. There is an exemption to the protected status.

The rest of it essentially defines the exemption and describes it - explains when and how one may go about killing one of the people who is normally forbidden.



Here, I've already done the homework for you:

You must be registered for see links

Now, if you want to think Israel is some kind of mastermind in all of that - that's just your problem. A bullet will eventually conduct the lobotomy you've already administered to yourself if so.



The only debate is exactly -what- falls under the laws of Sharia, since the Qu'ran is a convoluted mess and the Hadith only add to the complexity of attempting to 'go to the prophet in regards to what differs between you.'

Frankly, you -can't- consider yourself a Muslim if you do not believe in the application of Sharia, or at least Qu'ranic Law. Islam must be dominant over, at the very least, the Muslim Community - and a proper society has Muslims within a ruling caste over non-muslims.

The reason why this is -absolute- within Islam is because the entire premise of Islam is that Muhammad was revealed the 'book of truth' from God. The verses of the Qu'ran are not the words of a prophet so much as they are direct mandates and dictations from God - as is claimed by the Qu'ran and as is the founding principle of Islamic theology.

If you do not believe the qu'ran to be the literal wisdom of god and to be a system commanded to be implemented... then, frankly, you don't believe Muhammad was 'rightly guided.' If you don't believe that - then you essentially can't believe the qu'ran. If you look at the qu'ran with skepticism and with the belief that it should be modified or its policies abridged - then you're not a believer and therefor not a muslim.

It isn't like Christianity, where you can accept the Bible as an account written by man and therefor draw inspiration from its message or use historical context within the interpretation of stated laws or commands.

The very concept of the Qu'ran is, itself, absolute. It's an all or nothing book.

Just because I believe Muhammad was, at best, schizophrenic or at worst a demon in his own right does not mean I can't understand nor argue from the perspective of someone who does believe the Qur'an to be the literal wisdom of God.



So, if I were to create a religion dedicated to purging the world of other religions and breeding women among warriors to spawn the next generation of warriors....

I have not created a religion based upon terrorism?

While terrorism is, itself, a concept and thus beholden to no religion or demographic in particular - terrorism is a concept that can be incorporated into religions as a matter of course.

you see, that's the problem with mental sickness, when someone is crazy he strongly believes he's not.
when someone is stupid he stongly believes he's intelligent.
when someone is ignorant he strongly believes he knows everything.

and you can't change what these people believe, and because they believe they're true, they will come for you, and that's why their is terrorism, and that's why their is war.
and always will be.

 

[King of the Heavens]

Perhaps they don't teach this to peaceful muslims - but I know how to do this thing called "read."

It's fascinating when you read things and try to figure out what all of the patterns of scribbling and words is supposed to represent. To my surprise - I found that 'language' - particularly the written variety - means something.



Yes, that ayah is used from time to time to justify the fatwas regarding honor killings.

And do not kill the soul which Allah has forbidden, except by right. And whoever is killed unjustly - We have given his heir authority, but let him not exceed limits in [the matter of] taking life. Indeed, he has been supported [by the law].

The first phrase and preparatory in nature. Do not kill people from among the category of people forbidden to kill. Implied in the arabic is that there are those who muslims are permitted to kill.

There is an addendum to that preparatory phrase - except by right. This is establishing that one can have the right to kill from among those who are typically forbidden. There is an exemption to the protected status.

The rest of it essentially defines the exemption and describes it - explains when and how one may go about killing one of the people who is normally forbidden.



Here, I've already done the homework for you:

You must be registered for see links

Now, if you want to think Israel is some kind of mastermind in all of that - that's just your problem. A bullet will eventually conduct the lobotomy you've already administered to yourself if so.



The only debate is exactly -what- falls under the laws of Sharia, since the Qu'ran is a convoluted mess and the Hadith only add to the complexity of attempting to 'go to the prophet in regards to what differs between you.'

Frankly, you -can't- consider yourself a Muslim if you do not believe in the application of Sharia, or at least Qu'ranic Law. Islam must be dominant over, at the very least, the Muslim Community - and a proper society has Muslims within a ruling caste over non-muslims.

The reason why this is -absolute- within Islam is because the entire premise of Islam is that Muhammad was revealed the 'book of truth' from God. The verses of the Qu'ran are not the words of a prophet so much as they are direct mandates and dictations from God - as is claimed by the Qu'ran and as is the founding principle of Islamic theology.

If you do not believe the qu'ran to be the literal wisdom of god and to be a system commanded to be implemented... then, frankly, you don't believe Muhammad was 'rightly guided.' If you don't believe that - then you essentially can't believe the qu'ran. If you look at the qu'ran with skepticism and with the belief that it should be modified or its policies abridged - then you're not a believer and therefor not a muslim.

It isn't like Christianity, where you can accept the Bible as an account written by man and therefor draw inspiration from its message or use historical context within the interpretation of stated laws or commands.

The very concept of the Qu'ran is, itself, absolute. It's an all or nothing book.

Just because I believe Muhammad was, at best, schizophrenic or at worst a demon in his own right does not mean I can't understand nor argue from the perspective of someone who does believe the Qur'an to be the literal wisdom of God.



So, if I were to create a religion dedicated to purging the world of other religions and breeding women among warriors to spawn the next generation of warriors....

I have not created a religion based upon terrorism?

While terrorism is, itself, a concept and thus beholden to no religion or demographic in particular - terrorism is a concept that can be incorporated into religions as a matter of course.

Well if you don't believe it then who ****ing cares i ain't gonna waste my time trying to tell you that it's true