I haven't said a single morbid thing in this entire thread so I am 100% entitled to take my moral high groundYou must be registered for see images
psst i purposely said i wasnt targeting that at anybody in particular tho
have a happy halloween yo
I haven't said a single morbid thing in this entire thread so I am 100% entitled to take my moral high groundYou must be registered for see images
Nice day 2 u 2 :bye:
psst i purposely said i wasnt targeting that at anybody in particular tho
have a happy halloween yo
As of yesterday, she'd been moved to a female prison.This is her/him
You must be registered for see images
You must be registered for see images
http://www.unilad.co.uk/news/transgender-woman-sent-back-to-male-prison-despite-appeal/
Yeah, though she still has "remnants" of her ****.Was the surgery completed?
How has this become an insult? "Oh look at you people trying not to be shitty and offering aid." Like? You got us?The white knights in this thread.![]()
Wait, how is sending him to a female prison not shitty and offering aid? You don't think he'll victimize women as he has been doing previously? Come on dog... If he wasn't beating women up, maybe I'd agree to send him to a female prison. However, he's still a dude and I don't like the idea of sending a dude that dresses as a woman to a female prison. That's just asking for trouble.How has this become an insult? "Oh look at you people trying not to be shitty and offering aid." Like? You got us?
What, like that's not already happening in prisons regardless of gender? "We sent the sheman to man prison, we just fixed ALL the prisons guys! They're all safe now! None of those murderers and rapists and gang members will be harming each other now."Wait, how is sending him to a female prison not shitty and offering aid? You don't think he'll victimize women as he has been doing previously? Come on dog... If he wasn't beating women up, maybe I'd agree to send him to a female prison. However, he's still a dude and I don't like the idea of sending a dude that dresses as a woman to a female prison. That's just asking for trouble.
You're being nonsensical. You'll send this dude to a female prison to victimize people, but won't send him to a male prison to be victimized? I don't think either is necessarily right but there is no middle ground.What, like that's not already happening in prisons regardless of gender? "We sent the sheman to man prison, we just fixed ALL the prisons guys! They're all safe now!"
I actually don't care if she's victimized or not. Like I said, regardless of what prison she goes to, there's gonna be danger, so that's irrelevant to me. Plus, she's a criminal that hurt people. The only thing about this that's relevant to me is her status as a male-to-female transsexual. I think she should be recognized as female and placed in a female prison.You're being nonsensical. You'll send this dude to a female prison to victimize people, but won't send him to a male prison to be victimized? I don't think either is necessarily right but there is no middle ground.
The point is that none of those other things are problems can be linked to the court's decision. If a man gets sent to a female prison and impregnates women that fault can be charged to the court. :|
By this logic, gay men shouldn't go to male prisons.
How are those two quotes even similarly related?
OT: Thread is giving me the giggles. Don't see what the problem is
Go back and read what he was trying to explain to you. Then you'll understand why you look silly posting what you did. I'll quote everything if you want but it'd be considered spammingHow are those two quotes even similarly related?
I did. That was my response to him saying straight men shouldn't be in a female prison because the quote made no mention of the the women becoming pregnant as the issue, just the implied attraction that occurs between a straight man and woman. I didn't look silly because he made no mention of pregnancies being the problem when I said that. Not my fault he half-assed saying his argument.Go back and read what he was trying to explain to you. Then you'll understand why you look silly posting what you did.
:|I did. That was my response to him saying straight men shouldn't be in a female prison because the quote made no mention of the the women becoming pregnantas the issue, just the implied attraction that occurs between a straight man and woman. I didn't look silly because he made no mention of pregnancies being the problem when I said that. Not my fault he half-assed saying his argument.
Like I said, the post I replied to that with made no mention of pregnancies being the issue. Especially when the transsexual doesn't even have male genitals to get a woman pregnant with in the first place(which is why I had forgotten he even said the pregnancy thing by the time we got there, as it's completely irrelevant to this case).:|
So obviously you don't read. How is that I could grasp his point and you couldn't?
His first post did. Which I quoted.... :sdo:Like I said, the post I replied to that with made no mention of pregnancies being the issue. Especially when the transsexual doesn't even have male genitals to get a woman pregnant with in the first place.
Check the edit, and yes, someone here clarified that the surgery was complete. Thought she still has remnants, whatever that means, she can't actually get anyone pregnant. Hence, it's irrelevant to the case, which is why I forgot about it.His first post did. Which I quoted.... :sdo:
And that was his point from the jump. As far as I know, some trans still have their previous genitalia during the change. Can you show me where it says this trans doesn't? I think I might have missed it