@bold I agree. I really don't understand why they get so defensive when someone has an opinion of Smoker > Zoro.
Just because it's an opinion doesn't mean that you can spout whatever the nonsense you want. Opinions are supposed to be close to being true. Where as the point of Smoker being stronger than Zoro is noting more than pure BS at this point. I can just post Luffy > Admirals and say it's my opinion but it'll only make me look stupid. It'll the same for Smokers case.
Yeah because it never happened you never know what would have happened? not to mention we have no idea what would have happened if Smoker's Haki clashed with Pica's since it never happened so we don't know if Smoker would have been able to do a similar feat. Sanji used a named attack that had flames around it...I'm pretty sure that attack Sanji used was stronger than a normal haki hit that Luffy could throw out. Because we have an indication of what Vergo was like hitting him was like hitting a steel wall as stated by Sanji we have no idea how strong Pica's haki was.
He couldn't even do jack to haki less body of Vergo and youa re expecting him to do soemthing against his haki? Lol Sanji didn't use named attack and it doesn't matter if it has flames ,it can't change the fact that he wasn't using haki and still managed to pull same level of damage.
Pica's haki has the hype of being able to witstand mountain level slashes. When Joker said that Vergo can block Law's attacks he has no idea about what Law can do where as when Pica said that he could block Zoro's attacks even after witnessing what Zoro can do. That hype is more than enough to say that he has good mastery over haki.
Last edited: