- Joined
- Aug 5, 2012
- Messages
- 38,776
- Reaction score
- 2,272
Using those as example. If he can cut to whatever it faced, why stop there?
Him being able to cut through those things doesn't mean he can cut through anything. Him cutting through flesh and bones doesn't mean that he can cut through everything.
Which you are misinterpreting to be some form of intangibility.The difference here is that its supported with its spirit priority
And what about the term spiritual? Wouldn't that support its matter?
The meaning of the term "spiritual" doesn't mean that the sword would be intangible either.
You must be registered for see links
Ghastly, incorporeal. Terms like that would support your argument, but Yata can't be incorporeal since it does have a physical form, as shown when it cut the snakes and pierced Orochimaru.
Why doesn't because having no real physical form mean that it can't phase through Susanoo? When we have seen visual examples of ethereal jutsu and spiritual jutsu capability? Which makes it as valid?
No real physical form doesn't mean that it doesn't have a physical form, that's what. No real physical form means that it simply doesn't have a set physical form. Water has no real physical form, it takes the form of its container. Totsuka is liquid that pours out of the gourd and forms a blade.
The definitions of ethereal and spiritual don't indicate that something that is either of these things can't be touched. Especially when we've seen that Totsuka is a physical, corporeal object.