Pesudo-intellectuals xd then I'll entertain you, Narutfan4203.
Saying that the Databook is highly irrelevant only highlights that you're not only being biased but do not entirely understand the purpose of the Databook. Discrediting it because of a few hyperbole's is entirely erroneous on your part simply because for the greater part of what is written with the Databook it is not only credible contains relevant information about each character, jutsu, location, chakra, ect. Are all these elements 'false and irrelevant' as well? Certainly not yet they comprise of the majority of the DB. Here is where you fail on contradicting Yata's hype: Making inapplicable references to pit against the Shield's stated capabilities. "Hype" can only be discredited if what is portrayed conflicts with the hyperbole itself or a statement is made within the Manga that contradicts the Hyperbole. An example:
-> Hiruzen being the strongest of all
-> Sasuke's(version referenced in the databook) God-like speed
-> Sasuke (version referenced in the databook) is undefeatable by any Akasuki member.
-> Amaterasu being as hot as the sun.
The majority is cognizant that these are false due to the material presented in the Manga following these statements contradicting with and in most cases entirely discrediting them, however, it has been the contrary for Yata-no-Kagami. Thus far there has been nothing discrediting Yata-no-Kagami's capabilities as it has
You must be registered for see links
any attack attempting to breach it's defenses and
You must be registered for see links
it's properties to negate incoming offences. Your argument remains the same as the OP, an appeal to ignorance that
"Because Yata hasn't shown to block everything, it cant"
If applied says:
"Shisui can't use any Fire jutsu because he hasn't been shown to use any"
"A Mangekyo user like Izuna could not use Genjutsu because he hasn't been shown to use any"
ect.
Lastly, the Manga and story are Kishimoto's thus what ever he states is what it is.
Precisely so and I am aware of what superman is capabilities are but it makes no difference, when we are comparing a part-function Jutsu from the Naruto Manga to a DC character. It's only right and fair to give Yata-no-Kagami it's due credit that as many have already said: it was designed to negate all attacks and is the perfect Shield. However you are biased and only looking at the scenario from DC Comics standpoint. Since Superman's offences can be cross-referenced as a "physical attack" (something to which Yata negates) then he cannot destroy the shield.
Let us refute this one by one. Discrediting it because of a few hyperbole? The one I discredited for (Yata Mirror) is a hyperbole in itself! Like I said, you don't seem to get it. Multiversal debates are based off of
feats. Feats alone, not fallacious hyperbole. I never said it was not credible. Most of it however, is hyperbole. Like how sasuke has god-like speed and is undefeatable. Surely he is not, because in a mere 60 chapters, he would be kicked around at the summit. Instead of directly responding for a pointless argument that will likely come through with insults, I will simply tell you why it is discredited if you don't get my drift. Why yata's "hype" (lmfao) is discredited? There are simply no feats backing what it said. This is simple for someone of your intelligence to get, no? Show me feats of yata even remotely displaying durability anywhere close to what the databook claimed. In case you're wondering, let me just put two words out there for you;
You can't. It is as simple as that. With your "list", you already contradicted yourself. Point number 1. It simply contradicts itself because the only feat it has shown is tanking a town level at best attack. This is really easy.
Hyperbole in fiction:
OutskirtsBattleDome said:
Hyperbole is a term that refers to statements made in a particular work of fiction that are exaggerations of the actual truth of the matter. Often hyperboles are used as evidence in debates, and it can be very difficult to tell if a statement is hyperbole or not.
This is clear use of hyperbole in fiction. Your weapon in this debate is hyperbole, because you have not posted one scan of evidence, as I have posted 6. Via your self-proclaimed "logic", Yata mirror can tank the galaxy being destroyed, universe, the big bang, galaxies being shot into it, etc. Let me give you some examples of discredited hyperbole in comics.
1. Superman being called omnipotent (5 times)
2. The Presence calling himself omnipotent (Could not defeat the great evil beast)
3. Odin being called omnipotent (Was mid-tier skyfather level)
The shisui/izuna example? Lol, irrelevant! They're uchiha. It can be simply assumed. This is where the assumption of multiversal debates come in. Example: We cannot assume yata mirror can block everything simply because the author says so, it has no feats to do so. What you're trying to do here is form a loophole that we cannot get out of, so let me simply ignore this statement and leave it at that.
It cannot negate all physical attacks just because the author said so. DBZ for example, called Raditz faster than light for dodging piccolo's makenkosappo (Special Beam Cannon). This is not closely to even true. Using your logic however, it is. If it can be only fair to give your "due-credit" (cop out of debate) to Itachi, then superman, who has been called omnipotent, infinite power, is omnipotent. You see where this entire argument crumbles itself and just fails?
Pseudo-intellectual
1. One who attempts to flex intellect that does not exist within his or her own mind.