✪ Premium Avatars ✪

Jin

Active member
Supreme
Joined
Dec 22, 2012
Messages
21,037
Kin
2,211💸
Kumi
568💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Hope you like and enjoy them =D


You must be registered for see images
You must be registered for see images
You must be registered for see images
You must be registered for see images
 

Jin

Active member
Supreme
Joined
Dec 22, 2012
Messages
21,037
Kin
2,211💸
Kumi
568💴
Trait Points
0⚔️

Hei

Supreme
Joined
Aug 22, 2011
Messages
23,898
Kin
263💸
Kumi
250💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
The plaement is bad on the avatars.I guees it's because of the original image's size.You should either low the canvas size of avatar to the right proportion so the main part could fit or choose another image.
Other than that,nothing much.Try to find more imteresting stocks,that at least have some potential to work with.
 

Jin

Active member
Supreme
Joined
Dec 22, 2012
Messages
21,037
Kin
2,211💸
Kumi
568💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
The plaement is bad on the avatars.I guees it's because of the original image's size.You should either low the canvas size of avatar to the right proportion so the main part could fit or choose another image.
Other than that,nothing much.Try to find more imteresting stocks,that at least have some potential to work with.
IMO, the only bad placement is Itachi, and as you said, it was because of the original stock...
The focal point isn't necessarily meant to be on the face(front), but can instead be from the sides(Sannin Ava)...
Anyway, I think it's a matter of "perspective", everyone has his own idea/opinion about Designin(Avatars in this case.)
 

Hei

Supreme
Joined
Aug 22, 2011
Messages
23,898
Kin
263💸
Kumi
250💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
IMO, the only bad placement is Itachi, and as you said, it was because of the original stock...
The focal point isn't necessarily meant to be on the face(front), but can instead be from the sides(Sannin Ava)...
Anyway, I think it's a matter of "perspective", everyone has his own idea/opinion about Designin(Avatars in this case.)
Bold: or the arm, like on the 4th avatar ?
The really bad thing about avatars is their limited size,so the focal is important and it's not a big deal to figure it up, but my guess is that not every part can be used as focal point,especially in stocks with so little potential.

Underline: true,however from what i see here it's hardly can be called a "Design" .
 

Jin

Active member
Supreme
Joined
Dec 22, 2012
Messages
21,037
Kin
2,211💸
Kumi
568💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Bold: or the arm, like on the 4th avatar ?
The really bad thing about avatars is their limited size,so the focal is important and it's not a big deal to figure it up, but my guess is that not every part can be used as focal point,especially in stocks with so little potential.

Underline: true,however from what i see here it's hardly can be called a "Design" .
You can transform a stock with little potential into a great one, if you know how to, of course.
I doesn't matter, the hand/arm can be taken as a half focal point, then the other half being the hat and the face(which is between the arm/hand and the hat).If it is pleasant to the eye, then i guess it can be called nice.

That's why i put it in brackets...
And one other thing, you shouldn't criticize others work, i mean, giving cnc is OK, but you never know, for you their work may not be good, but for others it may be great. :)
Thank you :)
 
Top