actually yes, both sides of weather will get more extreme, the summers are becoming hotter and the winters colder
You do realize that this contradicts every law of thermodynamics.
that is global warming, it disrupts wind patterns, ocean currents, ...
Because those things are static?
global warming=/=warmer all the time
in it's simplest sense it means that the weather will be getting more and more extreme and there is no way anyone culd deny that is happening worryingly fast
Except the cooling is a global trend - even at the caps.
Climate 'scientists' postulated that warmer air would be pushed into the polar regions, raising their relative temperature and cooling the air before sending it back toward the equator, triggering storms.
Unfortunately, every single one of them failed physics, and doesn't realize that the specific heat of ice is abysmally low compared to the specific heat of water - with the specific heat of air being even lower than that.
The only way for the cooling trend we see to even begin to make sense is if you accept that more heat is escaping the atmosphere than is being radiated on it and retained.
Which means no global warming. No green-house effect. No man-made climate change of the politically expedient variety.
Sure - we change the climate. We level mountains, plant forests, release millions of tons of water vapor into the air every harvest season, etc.
The reason carbon emissions have been targeted is one simple reason:
Imperialism.
U.S. currency is not actually managed by the Treasury any longer. It is managed by the Federal Reserve - a private institution that charges interest to the government for its services while loaning money to virtually all U.S. banking institutions (also at interest).
It's a Ponzi Scheme that should have collapsed long ago. Except for one thing - Opec. Opec requires that all trade for its oil holdings be done in U.S. bank notes - or Federal Reserve bank notes. This is popularly referred to as the "Petro-Dollar."
"That's nice, Aim - so how does this relate to global warming?"
It's quite simple, really. The U.S. will use U.S. currency - plain and simple. Efforts by private banks to issue their own private notes (usually backed by silver or gold) have been slammed hard by the Federal Reserve (thus relegating them largely to the investment business). The U.S. will continue to use Federal Reserve bank notes because that is what we know, and we have already accepted its continual inflation as a fact of life - it is "Just what happens."
Therefor - every gallon of oil consumed by the U.S. is a gallon of oil that is not sold abroad. The more oil consumed abroad - the harder it is for other nations to 'kick' the U.S. Federal Reserve. The more goods and services that a fiat currency can be exchanged for - the more valuable that currency. The only way for the dollar to avoid inflationary collapse is to continually absorb economic activity from other regions of the globe.
Unfortunately - human economies are necessarily limited. That means that, even if the dollar were to expand and become the -only- world currency, it would eventually succumb to inflationary collapse. But the inflationary economic systems benefit those who are able to spend the interest payments prior to the economy 'feeling' inflation. If I were to be given six trillion dollars to spend, I could buy six trillion dollars worth of goods in a short period of time - then, a few months later, what I bought with six trillion dollars may now cost nine trillion dollars.
Politicians attempt to control the effects of inflation by raising minimum wage incrementally in response to inflation (which is, itself, inflationary) - but that effectively increases the number of people making minimum wage (which the economy then inflates around). I make roughly $15 per hour - or 200% of minimum wage. If minimum wage were to be raised to $11 an hour, I would be making only 136.3% of minimum wage. I work in dialysis, with many of our clients being VA and medicare patients - our labor costs do not have much room to go up while our cost for supplies will increase (all jobs related to transportation have their costs increased) - any increases in revenue afforded by the 'more money' in the lowest paid workers is not enough to increase my pay much higher than about $17 an hour - or 154.5% of minimum wage.
As prices adjust, my purchasing power with what I am paid in my job goes down while minimum wage workers remain in relatively the same spot (with regard to purchasing power).
This is what is known as: "Trickle Up Poverty."
You don't believe me? The new chair of the Federal Reserve has taken up Climate Change as a key issue:
You must be registered for see links
You must be registered for see links
Not only is the Federal Reserve looking to expand the "Petro-Dollar" by making more oil available to energy-starved nations like China (trying to get away from the dollar) - but they also plan to release a new 'currency' of sorts - 'carbon credits.'
It's downright ingenious, honestly.
They control existing markets expanding into new economies and emerging markets within established economies.
That's what the climate change alarmism boils down to. There are a lot of people who have been deluded into believing it, but the core driving force is pure economic conquest. No more. No less. It's not about solving real problems - only creating profitable ones.