What implies that Zoro could beat Arlong? If Luffy was in that state he probably couldn't be able to beat Arlong but there's nothing there that implies Zoro's superiority considering that Zoro didn't beat Arlong.
Zoro being equal to Luffy implies that he could've beat Arlong if he wasn't wounded. But that's not the thing explained in that point. I wrote that to tell that if Luffy was wounded like Zoro, he would've easily lost too. So, the argument that Zoro couldn't keep up with Arlong and Luffy did, so Luffy is stronger than Zoro is
Wrong.
This was Pre-Enies Lobby not to mention the desert fight was for comic relief and the fight in the town ended up with Nami oneshotting both. Doesn't really support that Zoro is equal to Luffy. Shanks and WB clashed, Mihawk and Vista clashed. Doesn't make Shanks=WB or that Mihawk=Vista.
I already explained to Chiharu why that fight was a serious fight. Zoro acted like that and even put on his bandana
before fighting which he only does in real fight, all because Luffy was serious too. About Mihawk clashing with Vista, read it in the manga(not anime, they extend things) and you will see Mihawk wasn't even paying attention to the fight, so you can't conclude Vista's strength from that. Moreover, you are underestimating Vista to some extent. About old WB and Shanks colliding,, they are equal in power IMO, but we still don't know the extent of Shanks' strength to backup this statement, which is not the case in a Zoro and Luffy comparison. WB was called the strongest after Roger as his rival died. Anyways, the result or comparison from their fight really doesn't matter here as in this case, we didn't get a statement or something that says Luffy is stronger than Zoro or viceversa.
This doesn't prove much. Sanji could've beaten Enel if he could touch him. The only thing Enel had going on for him was intangibility. He lost to pre-gears Luffy.
He lost to pre-gear Luffy and what about it? Sanji could've beaten Enel too and what about it? How does these lines prove Luffy anyhow stronger than Zoro.
Again, my real intention to write that point was the same as point no.1 about Arlong Park, i.e, Luffy beating Enel because of being his weakness doesn't put him above Zoro in anyway. You didn't understand what exactly did I said there.
The fact that Kaku is a swordsman doesn't mean that he isn't physically strong. He trains his physical strength. When they left for the secret mission Kaku's Doriki was lower than Jyabura's but afterwards it was higher. Which means that Kaku does indeed train. Not to mention Kaku knows Rokushiki and received the same Rokushiki training as Lucci which requires immense physical strength. 20 Douriki isn't much. Lucci's was 4000 and Kaku's 2200.
I must say,, What are you reading,?? I said that Kaku had the advantage of being a swordsman too, but that thing
isn't counted while measuring doriki. So their power levels aren't in the raio of 100 and 55. Swordsmanship was a major asset in case of Kaku. This thing already says that Zoro defeated an opponent near Lucci's level and was able to keep on fighting with the marines even after defeating Kaku,, plus take in consideration the fact that Luffy couldn't even move after his fight with Lucci. It's clear after all this, that defeating Lucci doesn't prove that he was stronger than Zoro even back then. If Lucci was pit against Zoro, only the level of diffivulty would've increased for Zoro.
How was Zoro supposed to fight Lucci? Zoro honestly stands no chance against Lucci. Zoro's speed and Durability were definately not enough to handle Lucci. Luffy has a rubber body which helps him tank blunt attacks. Zoro would've went down from those Rokyougans (he would've lost before Lucci could use them). Kaku and Jabra were rivals. Lucci was clearly miles above the duo.
Zoro had no problem keeping up with the swordsmanship of a soru user. That clearly means that his swordsmansip would've been able to keep up with a raw fighter like Lucci. Durability wise, you say Luffy's rubber body helped him tank Lucci's attacks? This is the same rubber body which got unconcious in Thriller bark from excessive stress, While Zoro's 'No-rubber-body' endured all that aside from his own too. It only proves that Zoro can tank Lucci's attacks better than Luffy. Kaku is easily above Jyabura by quite a distance because he has an additional, really powerful skill.
L.OL. Lucci nearly went in a coma when Luffy punch him with gear 3rd. And Zoro turned an attack of the caliber of gear 3rd into dust(In Enies Lobby of Kaku as I havce already explained). Zoro's Asura would've easily sliced through Lucci ending the fight.
Luffy went unconsious only because he thought the danger was over. He wasn't trying to remain consiousness anymore. Are you implying that Zoro wasn't trying to remain his consiousness? Luffy busted through Impel down, took Magellan's poison, Ivankov's treatment (twice), was imprisoned in the weird snow jail thing (don't remember the name) and fought in the war. Luffy's also a tank. Zoro's Durability is really the only category where he can be compared to Luffy.
Luffy clearly got unconcious from the pain. He wan lying unconcious on the ground
even before he got his shadow back from Moria. He gave a powerful punch and that was it for him, the stress made him loss conciousness. While Zoro besides All his own pain, due to which he was already near death, took in Luffy's pain and remained concious, more importantly survived. Now listen,
This is a feat by which we get a Clear Comparison between the durability of both and it's not comparable, Zoro owns Luffy in this department.
Now some other durability feats of Luffy you gave such Luffy busting through ID, Taking Magellan's poison, Ivankov's treatment 2x, fighting in war etc ,
Doesn't imply that his durability is in any way above Zoro. Why? Because We never get to saw Zoro going through all of this,, But.. We already got a solid comparison between Luffy's and Zoro's durability back in Thriller Bark. And using those events as a template, it's clear that if Zoro were went through all of these events, he would've done considerably endured all this better than Luffy.
What's there to say that he wouldn't have received the same exact treatment?
Zoro would've ended up with the same treatment, but even Kizaru said to Zoro that "You must have been tired", seeing as how he was K'O without resistance. This implies that Zoro would've performed better in those conditions as well just like Luffy, if his wounds hadn't opened.
Your comparing a casual G2 Jet pistol (blunt force) to Zoro's Rengoku Oni Giri (Sword attack). Luffy oneshotted E.G Hody with Red Hawk.
You are right about compring that punch to Onigiri, I take it, but it's main purpose was again to analyze Luffy. It's just like, he failed to hurt Hody and had problem with it even when he was hitting him Hard with Haki punches and Kicks, while Zoro even when playing with Hyouzou never had the slightest bit of problem. About Luffy giving Hody a Red Hawk but why are you saying that he One Shot him? Hody wasn't defeated after that, he had enough energy to get up again and eat some pills for a last power up. While Zoro one shotted Hyouzou. Period.
This fight had nothing to do with Luffy's strength and shouldn't even be used as an argument considering that both can casually one shot Monet.
When things go bad for you, you say that why did I put this argument? lol
That was made in 2007. Not to mention saying that they havet the same fighting power isn't saying that Zoro=Luffy. That statement roughly means that they were on the same level (back in 2007). The admirals have the same fighting power yet Akainu beat Kuzan.
Speed
Physical strength
Durability (debatable)
Stamina
Destructive Capacity
Luffy outclasses Zoro in all of those categories.
Nothing to backup your claim about stats. Sorry but this is not an argument. About that 2007 part too.
And when was it stated that the three admirals have the same fighting power?. Show me where was it stated.?
It wasn't stated anywhere! Only thing stated is that the admirals are World Government's "Greatest Fighting Force". Nothing more.
Lastly,, That point from databook still holds true.