- Joined
- Oct 30, 2012
- Messages
- 7,020
- Reaction score
- 632
What is the deal with this? Why are some people so adamantly and some even angrily against the Sage being an Uzumaki? That would be good for the plot. I can't see anything wrong with that.
It doesn't make people angry at the thought of it, people get annoyed because there have been multiple instances in the manga which contradict such a theory. Yet, the diehard Uzumaki fans still get starry eyed over the idea.
Eh, in my personal opinion it kinda ruins it, considering it you're not an Uzamaki or Uchiha, or senju, you're irrelevant. I would enjoy it more if he was just a powerful shinobi, from a regular family...
I don't see how it ruins it. he is one of the last Uzamaki this would also but some light onto why the clan was wiped out.
I dislike it because of how.. It makes Naruto less of what attracted me to the characterl. An underdog, someone who wasn't set for life. Knowing he is a descendant or possibly reincarnation of well, God, would make me lose even more interest in him.
I dislike it because of how.. It makes Naruto less of what attracted me to the characterl. An underdog, someone who wasn't set for life. Knowing he is a descendant or possibly reincarnation of well, God, would make me lose even more interest in him.
I dislike it because of how.. It makes Naruto less of what attracted me to the characterl. An underdog, someone who wasn't set for life. Knowing he is a descendant or possibly reincarnation of well, God, would make me lose even more interest in him.
Such as...?
The moment the Bijuu's paralleled him with Rikudou is when the whole "underdog" theme was completely vanquished.
What is the deal with this? Why are some people so adamantly and some even angrily against the Sage being an Uzumaki? That would be good for the plot. I can't see anything wrong with that.
The famous quote which states that the Uzumaki are no more than distant relatives of the Senju. Some people interpret this as meaning distant as in direct ancestry, but the timeline from the Ninshu era onwards simply isn't long enough. The other quote being the most obvious, the one where it was stated that the Sage was both Senju and Uchiha, in other words, he had a single, unique bloodline, which split between his two sons. The Uzumaki most logically occured as the offspring of a Senju and another, possibly non-select shinobi.
Other problems with the theory:
1) If Senju + Uchiha = Uzumaki, why were the Uzumaki only famous for their stamina and sealing abilites? Why don't they have powerful eyes and spiritual abilites, and adeptness for anything combat related? And if the Sage were an Uzumaki, why were neither of his offspring and their descendants noted for an adeptness with seals?
2) The problem noted above - There has never even been a hint that the Uzumaki have any sort of relations to the Uchiha, which is fundamental to the theory.
The famous quote which states that the Uzumaki are no more than distant relatives of the Senju. Some people interpret this as meaning distant as in direct ancestry, but the timeline from the Ninshu era onwards simply isn't long enough. The other quote being the most obvious, the one where it was stated that the Sage was both Senju and Uchiha, in other words, he had a single, unique bloodline, which split between his two sons. The Uzumaki most logically occured as the offspring of a Senju and another, possibly non-select shinobi.
Other problems with the theory:
1) If Senju + Uchiha = Uzumaki, why were the Uzumaki only famous for their stamina and sealing abilites? Why don't they have powerful eyes and spiritual abilites, and adeptness for anything combat related? And if the Sage were an Uzumaki, why were neither of his offspring and their descendants noted for an adeptness with seals?
2) The problem noted above - There has never even been a hint that the Uzumaki have any sort of relations to the Uchiha, which is fundamental to the theory.