- Joined
- Apr 26, 2012
- Messages
- 5,881
- Reaction score
- 143
I never thought of Sasuke in terms of the punishment he should or might get. I've only ever considered how it might be possible for him to redeem himself.
yeah same goes for me.
I never thought of Sasuke in terms of the punishment he should or might get. I've only ever considered how it might be possible for him to redeem himself.
lolololololololololololololololol.
thats the shinobi way.you have to kill sometimes to complete your tasks.even ninja belonging to villages does that.
despite all that,he warned them,although there was no need too.its not his fault.![]()
First, Your a Sasuke/Uchiha hater and your poll proofs that, there is not even a decent option for people who disagree with you.
Second, your logic doesn't make sense. Your saying that a hitman is not a murder because he gets paid for his kills. But somebody who kills for personal reasons is a murder. It makes no sense at all.
We have Raikage who attempted to kidnap Hinata, and than got Neji father killed. And he is a respected Kage.
We have Gaara, Danzo who killed how many people, and they respected.
We have Tsuchikage who hired Akatsuki to their biddings, and he is respected.
But Sasuke should be punished? Thats mad funny!!!!
p.s. Sasuke left a village that would have killed him if it wasn't for Itachi, they would have killed a kid just because of his clan, lets not forget that.
I think he liked that :| and besides Naruto wouldnt allow anyone to hurt his lov...erm...his friend.
The bolded thing happened because Uchiha hate curse makes all them untrustworthy, overemotional and maglo-maniacal as it has been shown in the past. Are you going to trust a lunatic that's behaving like Sarah Palin on period 24/7 to take part in politics of your state, no i don't think so. (ba-duum-tss!)
You don't see this shit happening with the Hyuuga, un!
The needs of the many outweight the needs of the few
Ughhh, here we go agaaaain, Don't mix war crime actions and state criminal law. Sasuke is a missing-nin, there's a huge difference.
Gaara is special case, i already answered it in the thread
They're both murderers, the diffence being, one is a gun and holds no responsibility for the kill and other is a criminal that went apeshit
I understand your position, the Uchiha are apparently not trustworthy because of their curse and to leave them in charge of your politics seems a bit risky, but not all the Uchiha were megalomaniacs or just plain crazy, Tobirama had a prejudice because he saw with his own eyes how Madara ended, but like I say not all the Uchiha end up as crazy assholes. Tobirama was afraid that another Madara would be ''born'' some day.
lol the Hyuugas just don't give a fuck or they are just more collected and discrete.
_________________________________
My Internet is being a dick, that's why I couldn't reply earlier.
Yeah, a total of ONE during Hashirama-Tobirama period
Two during Hiruzen-Minato period
and Zero during Tsunade rule
I WONDER WHY THEY WEREN'T TRUSTED BY THE VILLAGEYou must be registered for see images
----------------------------------------------------------------
Don't worry man, i still manlove you :flirty1:
Don't worry man, i still manlove you
i still manlove you
love you
It is somehow justified that they were not trusted, I admit that.
You must be registered for see images
There's so much...stupid in that one post...i ...i don't think i can ever come back from reading that. To think that such a braindead person is currently sharing my plane of existence is simply...bogus.