Woman Jailed for being Against Homosexuality

[Aim64C]

Then you're as much as a cancer to society as she is. She's forcing her opinions onto others because of her faith. All she has to do is accept the marriage documents, and if she doesn't want to do that just resign her post because she's not doing her job. It's not that hard. Surely God never told anyone they need to reject homosexual marriage.

No, she is not forcing her opinion onto others.

You must be registered for see links

" 402.005 Definition of marriage.
As used and recognized in the law of the Commonwealth, "marriage" refers only to the
civil status, condition, or relation of one (1) man and one (1) woman united in law for
life, for the discharge to each other and the community of the duties legally incum
bent
upon those whose association is founded on the distinction of ***.
Effective:
July 15, 1998
History:
Created 1998 Ky. Acts ch. 258, sec. 4, effective July 15, 1998 "

Per the Law of Kentucky, she is NOT to issue a marriage license to individuals not meeting the definition requirements for marriage.

 

[Bronze]

Then you're as much as a cancer to society as she is. She's forcing her opinions onto others because of her faith. All she has to do is accept the marriage documents, and if she doesn't want to do that just resign her post because she's not doing her job. It's not that hard. Surely God never told anyone they need to reject homosexual marriage.

Homosexual acts are prohibited in the holy books, let alone same *** marriage. It is the reason God destroyed the People of Lot, who refused to stop practising homosexuality. Don't get it twisted.

If I'm a cancer to society, then let me ask you this: If the worldwide population of homosexuality grew up to 25% by 50 years time, how will you respond?

 

[Punk Hazard]

Homosexual acts are prohibited in the holy books, let alone same *** marriage. It is the reason God destroyed the People of Lot, who refused to stop practising homosexuality. Don't get it twisted.

If I'm a cancer to society, then let me ask you this: If the worldwide population of homosexuality grew up to 25% by 50 years time, how will you respond?

Are you trying to determine the validity of a group of people who actually exist's right to do so based on a hypothetical situation that is, in all likelihood, never going to happen?

 

[ComplexCity]

Boy, okay? When did I say I disagree with incest?

So you agree with the unnatural effects of Incest and feel it should a law nationwide correct?

Don't put words in my mouth sis, that is, like I said earlier, why you look stupid. I know not everyone gets jailed for doing wrong things, but does that mean no one should be jailed because of the few that aren't?


I'm not the one who stated

What does this have to do with my post? You steal, you go to jail.

This point is perfectly relevant because the main point of me stating it was to show that the US Justice system is a joke. You have officials making derogatory comments about minorities while in office, officials lying under oath and etc. Yet they are not jailed. You have people raping 2 yr olds but not jailed.

Then you say I know nothing about instances where people suffer from police brutality? Boy, you tried.

Please don't act like you can't read or comprehend anything. This is what you stated

It's an issue, but it's not relevant to what we're talking about presently. The fact that you're talking to me about police brutality while also trying to defend someone being jailed for disregarding people's rights and going against the government speaks volumes. Your point isn't get across, and you look stupid attempting for it to.

And then my retort was

Glad to know you think nothing of the rights of people that were violated in the instances and crimes of police brutality. I look stupid yet, what I stated has everything to do with what we're talking about, how much of the joke the US Justice system is. But of course because you're a liberal and support homosexuality, whatever I say comes off as being stupid

How is the rights of people being violated against cops not relevant to the topic? It's literally the same issue.

Bolded cuh

Are you trying to determine the validity of a group of people who actually exist's right to do so based on a hypothetical situation that is, in all likelihood, never going to happen?

I like how you just ducked my post bruh

 

[Joker]

Bolded cuh



I like how you just ducked my post bruh

There are ways animals prevent incest in nature, yet 400+ species engage in homosexuality.

It's not relevant.

 

[Bronze]

Are you trying to determine the validity of a group of people who actually exist's right to do so based on a hypothetical situation that is, in all likelihood, never going to happen?

The growth of homosexuality in hypothetical percentage to 25% of the world's population by 50 years time, you can expect these list of results:

• Worldwide children of gay people don't have parents, or biological ones to be specific.
  
• The potential of polygamous, incestuous and bestial marriage. Oh wait, it's already happening, but in minor places, though with worldwide homosexuality, all of those will also be worldwide in society.
  
• Rise of paedophilia crimes; yes, most pedos are gay people.

That's only what I can think of, but there is probably ton more.

Do you really lack the capability to predict likely future events like this one, because this is what homosexuality will look like if it grows big, which inevitably will if we don't stop it now? Do you now support this offence against God instructions, violation of nature and non-traditional values?

 

[Punk Hazard]

Bolded cuh



I like how you just ducked my post bruh

The straight truth? It was too long. I saw it, read it and actually came up with responses to it all. But in between the length, the horrible formatting you decided to go with, the disinterest it created, and the week I've had, I found no enjoyment in replying and discussing that post, so I didn't. I actually started replying, wrote a paragraph, and realized it was nothing but tedious to respond to one point with one paragraph, much less continuing to write more.

Word of advice: Just because someone didn't reply to your bullshit doesn't mean they couldn't. The last thing you should do is take a lack of response as "Ha, knew I was right"

 

[ComplexCity]

There are ways animals prevent incest in nature, yet 400+ species engage in homosexuality.

It's not relevant.

I'd like to see link of this prevention that animals do

What's the point to your latter post? I hope it's not the fail argument "that since animals do it, then it's ok." Do you see females eating the heads of their husbands/baby daddies? If they do that, what do you think would happen?

It is relevant. Stop ducking the question because you're grasping at straws :|

 

[ComplexCity]

The straight truth? It was too long. I saw it, read it and actually came up with responses to it all. But in between the length, the horrible formatting you decided to go with, the disinterest it created, and the week I've had, I found no enjoyment in replying and discussing that post, so I didn't.

Word of advice: Just because someone didn't reply to your bullshit doesn't mean they couldn't. The last thing you should do is take a lack of response as "Ha, knew I was right"

No, you can't respond to it, that's the reason why. I have no problem reformatting because the stuff you were posting was obviously incorrect. Like I said, I don't know how or why an atheist would ever use the bible to back their points, especially when they don't understand the context. Nice excuse though

Edit: It's reformatted

 

[LustyLover]

The growth of homosexuality in hypothetical percentage to 25% of the world's population by 50 years time, you can expect these list of results:

• Worldwide children of gay people don't have parents, or biological ones to be specific.
  
• The potential of polygamous, incestuous and bestial marriage. Oh wait, it's already happening, but in minor places, though with worldwide homosexuality, all of those will also be worldwide in society.
  
• Rise of paedophilia crimes; yes, most pedos are gay people.

That's only what I can think of, but there is probably ton more.

Do you really lack the capability to predict likely future events like this one, because this is what homosexuality will look like if it grows big, which inevitably will if we don't stop it now? Do you now support this offence against God instructions, violation of nature and non-traditional values?

This is almost sig worthy.

 

[Multiply]

Marriage defined in the bible is between a man and a woman

Please stop :|

And where does God come in there? It is my understanding that men wrote these books? Correct me if I'm wrong though :lol.

Homosexual acts are prohibited in the holy books, let alone same *** marriage. It is the reason God destroyed the People of Lot, who refused to stop practising homosexuality. Don't get it twisted.

If I'm a cancer to society, then let me ask you this: If the worldwide population of homosexuality grew up to 25% by 50 years time, how will you respond?

I'll be 70 years old B. I won't give a damn :lol. Why do I care about what others choose to do with their life?

 

[Punk Hazard]

The growth of homosexuality in hypothetical percentage to 25% of the world's population by 50 years time, you can expect these list of results:

• Worldwide children of gay people don't have parents, or biological ones to be specific.
  
• The potential of polygamous, incestuous and bestial marriage. Oh wait, it's already happening, but in minor places, though with worldwide homosexuality, all of those will also be worldwide in society.
  
• Rise of paedophilia crimes; yes, most pedos are gay people.

That's only what I can think of, but there is probably ton more.

Do you really lack the capability to predict likely future events like this one, because this is what homosexuality will look like if it grows big, which inevitably will if we don't stop it now? Do you now support this offence against God instructions, violation of nature and non-traditional values?

I'm sorry, I missed the memo that predictions have now become guarantees. What you're saying right now is a fallacy called the slippery slope fallacy. "If we do this, this is gonna happen." People have tried it countless times, and been wrong countless times. Try that shit in a professional debate, and you're done.

1. And? Children who are in a gay marriage family are doing pretty well. Having gay parental figures doesn't guarantee your home life is any worse or any better. Just compare NPH's kid's home life to that of Honey Boo Boo's. Hint: The former is a gay parent household that is doing extremely well and the latter is a straight parent household where the mother married the man that molested her daughter.

2. Slippery slope

3. I'm pretty sure legalizing gay marriage isn't going to make pedophiles go "YES THIS IS PERFECT MOTIVATION TO **** KIDS"
Pedophilia is still harmful. Bestiality is still harmful. Incest is still harmful(though there are ways of circumventing this). That has not changed, so no, it wouldn't be accepted just because gay marriage has been.

 

[ComplexCity]

And where does God come in there? It is my understanding that men wrote these books? Correct me if I'm wrong though :lol.

Through the teaching of (Jesus) Christ did the men receive the laws in which Christians are supposed to follow. Can you please quote a scripture in the bible where God ok'ed homosexual marriage? Don't waste your time because you won't find it

 

[Lia]

Marriage defined in the bible is between a man and a woman

Please stop :|

How selfish. So we should just be unfair to other people who are kind, friendly and just want to express their love by an official bond? That's so stupid, I don't have any words for that.

Oh man, I also can't express how disgusting these retards are. If there was a loving god, would he say "noooo, these two humans are not allowed to express their love by an official bond" ? And if yes.. how can people praise this shit?

Edit: Oh and the bible or any other "holy book" is worthless, because it is written by stupid humans, who didn't even know that earth is a ball or what a solar eclipse is.
If you drink a lot of alcohol, you can also talk with good or hear his words. These People back then were just stupid as **** because of the lack of knowledge by science.
These books were not written by a god.

grow up, we are not in the middle age.
Back then, marriage was an economic feature for kingdoms which wanted to expand or was used for other political crap. We humans evolved and still are evolving (thankfully) and so should marriage. We should see it as a bond of two people who deeply and absolutely love each other and want to stay together until death parts them. Nothing more, nothing less.
Irrespective of their religion, race, gender or whatever else.

And the woman had no right to put her beliefs over the law and couldn't be fired, so it's right to throw her into prison. Same should be done to any racist, homophobic or any other criminal.

 

[Punk Hazard]

No, you can't respond to it, that's the reason why. I have no problem reformatting because the stuff you were posting was obviously incorrect. Like I said, I don't know how or why an atheist would ever use the bible to back their points, especially when they don't understand the context. Nice excuse though

If telling yourself that is what makes you feel good, then go ahead. No skin off my nose. Maybe you're immature enough to be goaded by childish taunting, but I left that behind in middle school.

 

[LustyLover]

Don't waste your time because you won't find it

So just like God.

The Bible isn't a valid argument in regards to this, period. Keep your religious beliefs to yourselves.

 

[Joker]

I'd like to see link of this prevention that animals do

What's the point to your latter post? I hope it's not the fail argument "that since animals do it, then it's ok." Do you see females eating the heads of their husbands/baby daddies? If they do that, what do you think would happen?

It is relevant. Stop ducking the question because you're grasping at straws :|

You must be registered for see links

Natural = found in nature

If it isn't hurting anyone, and they're consenting, then it's fine, which is my point. So obviously I disagreeing with eating their young.

????

 

[Multiply]

Through the teaching of (Jesus) Christ did the men receive the laws in which Christians are supposed to follow. Can you please quote a scripture in the bible where God ok'ed homosexual marriage? Don't waste your time because you won't find it

How am I the one that has to quote your bible? Give me evidence of God itself confirming he doesn't like gays or gay marriage. I don't want bible quotes either because that's man made. Give me some actual evidence.

 

[LustyLover]

How am I the one that has to quote your bible? Give me evidence of God itself confirming he doesn't like gays or gay marriage. I don't want bible quotes either because that's man made. Give me some actual evidence.

They don't have any proof that being gay, or gay marriage, is unethical. They don't have any logical reasoning either, that's why they just use The Bible/The Torah to back up their claims because truth is, they really have nothing else.

 

[Bronze]

I'm sorry, I missed the memo that predictions have now become guarantees. What you're saying right now is a fallacy called the slippery slope fallacy. "If we do this, this is gonna happen." People have tried it countless times, and been wrong countless times. Try that shit in a professional debate, and you're done.

And how do you know it won't? Either way, I asked ''if'' it happens.

1. And? Children who are in a gay marriage family are doing pretty well. Having gay parental figures doesn't guarantee your home life is any worse or any better. Just compare NPH's kid's home life to that of Honey Boo Boo's. Hint: The former is a gay parent household that is doing extremely well and the latter is a straight parent household where the mother married the man that molested her daughter.

Actually, it does. The child of a gay parent is likely to be verbally and physically abused by his/her fellow peers, because the child is simply different others, in that his/her parents are gay. Also, about NPH; he's a celebrity, and his kids will be popular wherever they go.

2. Slippery slope

What does that means?

3. I'm pretty sure legalizing gay marriage isn't going to make pedophiles go "YES THIS IS PERFECT MOTIVATION TO **** KIDS"

Most pedophiles are gay people.

Pedophilia is still harmful. Bestiality is still harmful. Incest is still harmful(though there are ways of circumventing this). That has not changed, so no, it wouldn't be accepted just because gay marriage has been.

If those are harmful, then homosexuality is harmful as well. Don't be a hypocrite.