Lmao, you're hilarious I mean seriously.
You can't rely on the data book to compare characters overall strength, let alone an overall points comparison from every fields.
I feel like you misunderstood the purpose of a databook.
The data book means nothing especially if you're making a top list.
"Numbers prove it" Rofl, and you're even trying to make it look as it proves anything when you're in total mistake.
We can see that you're biased just by the fact that you're saying Pain could beat Obito.
How could Pain beat Obito who has the rinnegan, MS , 6 Bijuu and the gedo mazo?
Sasori is far from being stronger than Kisame and Kakuzu, he got beat by an old woman and got trolled a second time during the war. He's on par with Deidara. Kisame and Kakuzu are on par. That is how it is.
Sooo...
1) stop insulting and extremizing. If you think it makes you look cooler, you're wrong.
2) databook doesn't matter because you say so? Kewl.
3) making a point of the Pain > Obito thing? I already said I don't know who would win, because Kamui is nasty and Wood release also is, and Tobi had both powers since the beginning, and I can see someone beating Pain with those.
But let's make it clearer, of course if you take the enhanced Obito which aquired the Rinnengan from the Rain village and the Jinchuriiki bodies through Kabuto, then sure, Pain stands no chance against it. Not that it means much, since it's pretty obvious that just nobody tops that nor stands any chance against that in a solo duel - it took four powerful shinobi to make Obito break a sweat.
EDIT: now that we're speaking of it, how come that when I say that Obito trumps all because of the Rinnengan and the Jinchuriki I'm scolded because they're "not really his power" but when I try to evaluate Obito just for his original powers I'm scolded as well? Why don't we set out a rule and decide that what people can use in any fight can be safely considered to be "their" power?
So no, I'm not biased. If I were biased, anyway, I would contest that Suna is the weakest vill. since it's also my favorite one. And I also like Obito a lot more than Nagato, so once again if out of personal preference I'd just say Obito wins hands down. But I don't in both cases, in one because the manga says otherwise, in the other because we have no source. Objectivity. Me has it. I hope the Pain-Tobi case is closed.
4) Sasori allowed himself to be killed in the first fight and fought without his entire arsenal the second fight. In both fights he was against superior numbers, also. Orochimaru thought Sasori was a serious problem, which speaks enough of him being on a different level.
5) Again, I'm not saying I'm SURE that Konan trumps Hidan, I am merely saying we don't have anything to do a solid comparison. Considering the feats of both I'd put my money on Konan but I wouldn't gamble an arm on it.
8) I would like to understand how can I be "mad" and "hilarious" since I agreed with you on many statements. If your definition of a ridicoluos fool is someone who doesn't agree with you 100% than it is perhaps a little too broad.
