I'm talking about in a serious fight like the one Law and Smoker had. Luffy is a careless joker capable to lose against people even inferior to him but i'm talking about a serious Luffy here. A serious Luffy is never getting mid diffed by Law at all. They are too close in portrayal for that to happen. Hence Smoker getting mid diffed by someone near equal to Luffy in portrayal shows the gap that currently exists between them
It doesn't really matter if Luffy is serious or not...if Law hits Luffy once it's over especially if Law does what he did to Smoker and use a distraction to give him a second to launch an attack. I just think it's a bit baseless to say because Law was able to beat Smoker with a certain level of difficulty then Luffy will be able to do the same considering both Luffy and Law have two completely different fighting tactics Law uses more strategical tactics in order for him to get the KO hits with his Ope Ope No Mi while Luffy is more of a brawler similar to Smoker...and again Luffy showed interest in wanting to fight Smoker at
full power so this shows or indicates at least Smoker is at a level he could actually give Luffy a decent fight.
It wasn't just a fighting method comparison. She was clearly shocked about his strength. She could never imagine he was so strong to the point she wondered what amount of training he did to become so strong.
Because he was able to beat her through fear...it wasn't anything to do with strength itself so to say and of course she's going to wonder where he was training I mean the Strawhats had been MIA for two years.
The portrayal was really clear. As for the worse generation-Smoker on the floor thing it was to signal the potential Law talked about while defeating Vergo. He was basically saying the supernovas from the worse generation have better potential than the rest, monologuing while defeating a guy Smoker couldn't beat. The direct comparison was also clear there
So you're basically trying to say Smoker isn't cut out to be challenging the New Generation yeah? Just a reminder Vergo was shown to be physically superior to Law speed, physical strength and durability from physical attacks. Again it comes down to the fighting styles of course Law is going to have an easier time against someone like Vergo when his Ope Ope No Mi allows him to essentially one shot people while Smoker who's a physical brawler punched it out with Vergo and not only did he show at times greater speed and strength that Vergo he also showed immense durability.
Current portrayal however suggest they are close in strength no matter what you say/want to believe and so far Zoro is toying with him. Zoro's portrayal since the timeskip started is closely comparable to Luffy's, from fighting comparable opponents to receiving similar hypes and even in the current arc, replicating similar feats(Grizzly Magnum-1080Pound Phoenix comparison on golem Pica) or hype(Luffy telling Viola that Zoro can defeat anyone). With all this, it's impossible for me to put Smoker over Zoro
What does Pica honestly have that puts him on Vergo's level? Vergo was able to dominate Sanji, Law and Smoker three extremely powerful characters what has Pica honestly done other than make threats and statements he hasn't been able to back up. How can you say no matter what I say they are close in strength you have nothing to prove that at all.
As for Zoro's portrayal yes it has been similar to Luffy's however both of them have only battled fodders really since starting the New World. Luffy is a little bit different as he has beat people like Chinjao etc however Zoro hasn't beaten anyone really that makes his unbeaten record in the New World that impressive. I mean heck have Sanji fight the Octopus guy in fishman island and Monet (of course take out the fact Sanji can't hit woman) then Sanji would be on winning streak as well.
Also attacks like Grizzly Magnum and 1080 Phoenix cannon while impressive shouldn't be used as feats in a fight against Smoker the damage capabilities of one's attack does not automatically make someone stronger take Whitebeard for example he could wreck multiple islands yet he was equal or slightly weaker than Roger who to our knowledge only had the ability to use Haki and his attacks would be far less destructive. Not to mention the quote about Luffy saying Zoro can beat anyone shouldn't be taken as a feat it's like taking Doflamingo's quotes were he believes Vergo could block himself from Law's attack as a feat or how Pica says he could beat Fujitora and Sabo I mean I doubt Luffy thinks Zoro could beat Doflamingo right...so it's not anyone really.