- Joined
- Dec 21, 2011
- Messages
- 1,749
- Reaction score
- 41
I think she's misunderstood, a lot of people dislike her because of part 1 and have carried it over to part 2.
And also because she beats up Naruto alot
[video=youtube;a-7QsECUvz0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-7QsECUvz0[/video]
You must be registered for see images
sakura = trash
If sakura=trash then so does karin.
Uhm,no...
Uhm,no...neither of them are.
He thinks sakura has done nothing but if I say sakura healed people then he will disagree and the only thing karin has really done is heal sasuke. So technically they are both trash.
P.S I don't think either of them are trash. I'm just trying to prove him wrong.
sAKURA IS TRASH
but don't say I am a hardcore NH fan.
But Kishimoto said, that she was a honest girl.
sAKURA IS TRASH
but don't say I am a hardcore NH fan.
thanks. And no, I took the time to find it on google and then photoshop it my way.
THey are similar and I am an expert in photoshop. and its the sig and not a avatar. so ha.
THey are similar and I am an expert in photoshop. and its the sig and not a avatar. so ha.
Yeah, I just don't like her personality as a whole. I don't give a rat's fucking ass what's she meant to symbolize, since I heard many people say she represent human weakness, and I just want to make clear I don't give a shit about that, as that doesn't excuse anything.
An opinion is to be respect so long as it is on something which has no objective content, if we are talking about objective matter then Im afraid it isnt worth sht. What Kishimoto opines a portrayal of an objective notion such as honesty and whether that is truly the case or not are two different things. Taking advantage of someone elses feelings for you is not honesty, in fact it is a contextual definition of dishonesty.