- Joined
- Feb 24, 2013
- Messages
- 4,586
- Reaction score
- 433
Why do people say, "Person A with intel could beat person B" and then use this as a means of saying that person A > person B? People also say stuff like "Person A defeats person B if you restrict so and so from person B" and they use this as a point to say person A > person B as well.
You are literally giving person A an advantage and you are handicapping person B when you do this. It would only be natural for person A to win in this case and it would just be embarrassing if person A lost since they had the advantage.
That is like someone saying "If I have a machine gun and Bruce Lee's arms and legs are tied up then I can beat Bruce Lee. That means I am stronger than him".
Why do people do this?
You are literally giving person A an advantage and you are handicapping person B when you do this. It would only be natural for person A to win in this case and it would just be embarrassing if person A lost since they had the advantage.
That is like someone saying "If I have a machine gun and Bruce Lee's arms and legs are tied up then I can beat Bruce Lee. That means I am stronger than him".
Why do people do this?