Technically Itachi wasn't killed by Sasuke, there was never a death blow. Itachi just died because of his disease. Plus he had some bullshyt faith in Sasuke that after Sasuke "killed him" he'd return to the village a hero and spread the good word of the Uchiha's. However he was dead wrong because Madara got to him, spilled the truth makeing Sasuke an even more vengeful prick and obsessed with killing the elders (who deserve to die in my view as well) and also the village, who had no idea of what was going on so that was a completely unjust to Konoha. However Itachi took precausion and put something down Naruto's throught (Uchiha steroids) and if his plan failed Naruto was his plan B...I think
Agreed with for the most part, and slightly well.... wholely less homoerotic than oFuiinJutsuus version of things.. and seems to be more of a factual based version of things. I'll plus one rep you for being amongst the people who have realized that Sauske , and Orochimaru never delivered a fatal blow.
What I dont get and would/could debate, the prickishness of the elders left in the leaf. I dont see why they couldnt be controlled with Danzos right eye in to being pricks. Their personalities changed, from where they were standing there fighting with the third hokage, to distain and contempt with the 5th Hokage, and the way she does things like Danzo does. If their being pricks because their pricks then yeah I can see them getting bumped off and it not being that big of a big deal, but if their being manipulated into being pricks when they are not really then thats a load of crap. IMO
I like the Naruto as a plan be idea, because we know Naruto has some of Itachis power/ Itachis gift. But Narutos latent ability is to bring back monsters created from hate to the world of humanity and reason. ex Zabzua, Negato, Sora, ect.