FizzyDrink
Active member
Basically what I'm trying to get across here is that people HAVE to stop comparing characters who we've only heard about to characters that we've actually been able to witness the majority of their powers.
A prime example is the many Nagato versus Hashirama threads. For goodness sake, no one can say 100% that Nagato beats him! Nagato beats WHAT WE'VE SEEN FROM HIM, not what his full potential is, because clearly his full potential was much more than we currently know.
Same goes for other characters, such as Tobirama, of whom we only have hype, and no actual feats that we've seen. Why compare his water jutsu to Kisame's when we haven't really seen much of it at all? Or even the Sage of the Six Paths! People put him in VERSUS scenarios. That's just stupid. We know he was powerful, but how in the world are we supposed to know if he can beat every shinobi in the shinobi alliance without having actually seen his true power?? So basically I'm telling you that some of you are arguing points that do NOT need to be argued because there is simply NOT enough information about a certain character. Good day.
A prime example is the many Nagato versus Hashirama threads. For goodness sake, no one can say 100% that Nagato beats him! Nagato beats WHAT WE'VE SEEN FROM HIM, not what his full potential is, because clearly his full potential was much more than we currently know.
Same goes for other characters, such as Tobirama, of whom we only have hype, and no actual feats that we've seen. Why compare his water jutsu to Kisame's when we haven't really seen much of it at all? Or even the Sage of the Six Paths! People put him in VERSUS scenarios. That's just stupid. We know he was powerful, but how in the world are we supposed to know if he can beat every shinobi in the shinobi alliance without having actually seen his true power?? So basically I'm telling you that some of you are arguing points that do NOT need to be argued because there is simply NOT enough information about a certain character. Good day.
