[Discussion] Why are you proud of your race instead of your own achievements?

[Deadlift]

Yellow Pride should be a thing too, lol.

How about Green pride? Namekians have been quite mistreated lately

 

[HashiraMadara]

Its funny how white people accomplished more than any other race combined, yet no one but the people who shame other races actually feels proud about it. Go figure.

I think it's funny how no one can 100% define to you what is "whites"

 

[HashiraMadara]

I do not care for my own race, the White race, per se. What I care for is a people’s capacity to produce men the likes of Socrates, Marcus Aurelius, the men of the enlightenment and American founding fathers, Darwin, Newton, Tesla etc etc.

What defines these men? Extraordinary cognitive ability and extraordinary character, traits which are not identically distributed across human populations.

A cheetah isn't the fastest track sprinter because it's not a track sprinter, Is a cheetah faster than Usain Bolt, yes it is. Is a cheetah a faster track sprinter than Usain, no it's not. So basically your sentiment(which is a mistake) is formulating a definition of fast acquainted with track sprinting, which by default will eliminate cheetah, horses etc leaving you praising a Usian Bolt. Then again, this is just an example, I trust a man like you can figure it out.

I am convinced that of the current races of man, Europeans have the highest capacity to produce men of that calibre, Ashkenazi Jews and East Asians less (the Ashkenazim produce great theorists but have little ability for the practical, the reverse seems to be true for the East Asians) and most other races have little to no ability.

Using the example above your definition of fast eliminates over 4 billion people as you are clearly not looking for a fast being but a track sprinter. Looking for mathematical logic and equivalence(your definition of intellect) to races whose development and evolution wasn't of encircled land(You only get civilized if your evolution depended on survival over a small piece of land so either fight tricks into keep surviving there or you go extinct. Heck Australoids, Africans, Americans etc had acres of land and kept the conflict at minimal by simply migrate into newer lands if a new force arrives. That was impossible for Jews and Europeans who lived right in the dense metros) is pretty much futile. If that floats your boat anyways.

Putting aside my own reasons for the preservation of certain populations the fact is that racial and ethnic self-preservation is simply the instinct to preserve one's self and kin at a larger scale.

The only non sentimental answer you've given so far

No one questions the Japanese maintaining Japan as an ethnostate of the Japanese people to this day, or the Nigerians or the Turks etc etc. It is only White Europeans who are by definition Nazis when they wish to preserve themselves as a people.

That's pure naivete, Japan Government and fellow east Asian states are actively encouraging "diversity". That is not to say the citizens share the same beliefs though. As for White Europeans, that's an internal conflict: if you cannot even convince 50% of the other White Europeans why you don't need refugees then you can forget about convincing me if I was a refugee.