White Supremacists shoot at protesters after Richard Spencer speech.

[Goetia]

You sure like asking questions don't you? It's almost as if you don't know anything at all.

How were they acting like goons? Really? They planned to go there with the sole intention of silencing the white supremacists and shutting down their event, and all under the name of "love" and "anti racism". Many of them with anti-white signs that could as well be holding signs that say "**** white people".

When you're someone who preaches a garbage opinion, e.g. a white supremacist or any kind of supremacist, your free speech rights mean f*ck all. What's funny is how people on the right accuse people on the left of wanting to silence free speech, when in cases like this, where white supremacists are the ones being silenced, retards like you come to defend them and their right to free speech. Its retard speech mate.

 

[Pumpkin Ninja]

Tbh, I'd expect it from the other side, more

Also, here's Wicke getting butthurt again when white supremacists are mentioned.

 

[Fountain]

When you're someone who preaches a garbage opinion, e.g. a white supremacist or any kind of supremacist, your free speech rights mean f*ck all. What's funny is how people on the right accuse people on the left of wanting to silence free speech, when in cases like this, where white supremacists are the ones being silenced, retards like you come to defend them and their right to free speech. Its retard speech mate.

Yeah, because if you disagree with someone it's ok to infringe upon their freedom of speech. It doesn't matter if they are *******s or not, the moment you do stupid shit like this you show that you're no better than them.

 

[Lightbringer]

Yeah, because if you disagree with someone it's ok to infringe upon their freedom of speech. It doesn't matter if they are *******s or not, the moment you do stupid shit like this you show that you're no better than them.

But you're defending people who did just that and placing the blame on the protesters....

 

[Goetia]

Yeah, because if you disagree with someone it's ok to infringe upon their freedom of speech. It doesn't matter if they are *******s or not, the moment you do stupid shit like this you show that you're no better than them.

You wouldn't defend the people on the left's right to free speech, because it doesn't suit your agenda. The protesting was peaceful until the supremacist ****tards came in with guns and almost killed people. How is that not the morally and logically indefensible action in your eyes? You'd rather focus in on people you don't agree with because of your ideological bias.

 

[Dreckerplayer]

Heeeey, about the time something would happen that includes white supremacists. Been a long time since you post an article from a website like washingtonpost. Been a lot happening lately but you only do this when it comes to white people Color me surprised.

You wanna know what i think? I don't care. If they were smarter they wouldn't go there to "protest" and possibly get shot. These degenerate's definition of love is hate, censorship, antifa, violence, and calling anyone they disagree with a Nazi. They are complete hypocrites and if they hate Richard Spencer so much because he's a racist or w/e they shouldn't be there at all to begin with giving him more notoriety. **** them.

Honestly...you actually make sense.There's no disagreeing with this, cause it's actual.

Protesting, bottom line, isn't smart...cause you're obviously putting yourself out there for possibilities of getting shot, beaten, or harassed.Stop publicly POPPING/SCREAMING you're views in someone's face,expecting someone to care, it's controlling, and it's public indecency.Protests can be aggressive...protests can intimidate...protests are like asking for a fight.And some people can see straight through it.And honestly, if it ain't aggressive...no one's listening.

Some people, just see a bunch of self-entitled victims.They couldn't care less for their argument. Then you have OTHER self-entitled victims, such as white supremacists, that don't take a liking to people protesting against their views.

Doesn't make it right to shoot, though. This is simply a battle of the victims that think they're at the center of the universe. Two opposites of the same spectrum.

Deceitfulness.Protesting is just attention seeking, lmao.

 

[Lightbringer]

Honestly...you actually make sense.There's no disagreeing with this, cause it's actual.

Protesting, bottom line, isn't smart...cause you're obviously putting yourself out there for possibilities of getting shot, beaten, or harassed.Stop publicly POPPING/SCREAMING you're views in someone's face,expecting someone to care, it's controlling, and it's public indecency.Protests can be aggressive...protests can intimidate...protests are like asking for a fight.And some people can see straight through it.And honestly, if it ain't aggressive...no one's listening.

Some people, just see a bunch of self-entitled victims.They couldn't care less for their argument. Then you have OTHER self-entitled victims, such as white supremacists, that don't take a liking to people protesting against their views.

Doesn't make it right to shoot, though. This is simply a battle of the victims that think they're at the center of the universe. Two opposites of the same spectrum.

Deceitfulness.Protesting is just attention seeking, lmao.

How do you think the American Revolution started?

 

[Fountain]

You wouldn't defend the people on the left's right to free speech, because it doesn't suit your agenda.

Maybe, maybe not, but i wouldn't try to stop them, that's the difference.

Gee... I wonder what agenda that could be...

The protesting was peaceful until the supremacist ****tards came in with guns and almost killed people.

Oh boo hoo. They shouldn't have been there in the first place. When you play with fire you get burned and some of them almost did. I'm not saying i'm ok with it but again, if they were smarter they wouldn't be protesting like children.

How is that not the morally and logically indefensible action in your eyes? You'd rather focus in on people you don't agree with because of your ideological bias.

No. I rather stand for what is right. Nobody should be censored over a simple disagreement.

 

[Goetia]

Maybe, maybe not, but i wouldn't try to stop them, that's the difference.

Gee... I wonder what agenda that could be...



Oh boo hoo. They shouldn't have been there in the first place. When you play with fire you get burned and some of them almost did. I'm not saying i'm ok with it but again, if they were smarter they wouldn't be protesting like children.



No. I rather stand for what is right. Nobody should be censored over a simple disagreement.

The whole point of protest is to show that you disagree with a particular thing. But you'd rather that people suffer in silence on a particular issue? The first amendment of your own constitution protects the right to free speech, and you're telling me that they shouldn't be able to exercise that right? Your entire post is hypocrisy at its finest.

 

[Dreckerplayer]

How do you think the American Revolution started?

Lmao, are you comparing modern day american protests, to a WHOLE american revolution?I don't think this is at that scale.

No one said protesting wasn't necessary...just said it's nothing smart...cause you're putting yourself at risk of certain things.When is it ever considered smart to put yourself at risk...over something absolutely stupid.

 

[Uzumaki Macho]

Now the edgelord is victim blaming too. What a surprise.

 

[Lightbringer]

Lmao, are you comparing modern day american protests, to a WHOLE american revolution?I don't think this is at that scale.

No one said protesting wasn't necessary...just said it's nothing smart...cause you're putting yourself at risk of certain things.When is it ever considered smart to put yourself at risk...over something absolutely stupid.

@Bold: You did though...

Deceitfulness.Protesting is just attention seeking, lmao.

 

[Dreckerplayer]

@Bold: You did though...

Nope, you didn't make a point.You're incredibly decietful and truly just desperate to prove a point.Lmao, you're not outsmarting anyone. You gotta actually be smart to do that. But it's okay.

Don't be so desperate. One thing I notice about you, is that whenever someone makes a point,a valid point even, you suddenly ask another question,to curb the topic, as a desperate attempt to be right.You read posts, constantly insinuate things, and ask a question as some kind of set up to start laying down all these rehearsed arguments.Full of traps and set ups. What you did was incredibly elementary...full of elementary tactics, that I don't appreciate.God, what you did was incredibly self-important.This could of been something healthy, but it went left.

A lot of protesting IS attention-seeking...but doesn't mean it isn't well-deserved.

 

[Goetia]

Honestly...you actually make sense.There's no disagreeing with this, cause it's actual.

Protesting, bottom line, isn't smart...cause you're obviously putting yourself out there for possibilities of getting shot, beaten, or harassed.Stop publicly POPPING/SCREAMING you're views in someone's face,expecting someone to care, it's controlling, and it's public indecency.Protests can be aggressive...protests can intimidate...protests are like asking for a fight.And some people can see straight through it.And honestly, if it ain't aggressive...no one's listening.

Some people, just see a bunch of self-entitled victims.They couldn't care less for their argument. Then you have OTHER self-entitled victims, such as white supremacists, that don't take a liking to people protesting against their views.

Doesn't make it right to shoot, though. This is simply a battle of the victims that think they're at the center of the universe. Two opposites of the same spectrum.

Deceitfulness.Protesting is just attention seeking, lmao.

Your reasoning isn't great either. If everyone went by it, nobody would leave their house. Living is risk. There is some level of risks associated with every single action.

Protesting isn't about the things you just said. And if you think it is, you completely missed the point. Nobody is forcing their opinion on you. If you don't like it, don't read the article about it. You accuse the protestors of self-victimisation when you're the one making yourself out to be a victim of people's words and actions that haven't affected you in any way. You're the deceitful one here.

 

[Dreckerplayer]

Your reasoning isn't great either. If everyone went by it, nobody would leave their house. Living is risk. There is some level of risks associated with every single action.

Protesting isn't about the things you just said. And if you think it is, you completely missed the point. Nobody is forcing their opinion on you. If you don't like it, don't read the article about it. You accuse the protestors of self-victimisation when you're the one making yourself out to be a victim of people's words and actions that haven't affected you in any way. You're the deceitful one here.

Nope,WRONG. And nope, WRONG again! And dumb dumb, you're comparing regular living to PROTESTING. That's another scale, you're actually putting yourself at an even bigger risk, by drawing that kind of attention to yourself. Screaming, holding signs, marching, etc....what are YOU talking about? And regardless if you're not screaming.

Nice try...very nice try.You're absolutely a liar. My reasoning is absolutely real.

The desperation is at an ALL TIME HIGH.

 

[Lightbringer]

Nope, you didn't make a point.You're incredibly decietful and truly just desperate to prove a point.Lmao, you're not outsmarting anyone. You gotta actually be smart to do that. But it's okay.

Don't be so desperate. One thing I notice about you, is that whenever someone makes a point,a valid point even, you suddenly ask another question,to curb the topic, as a desperate attempt to be right.You read posts, constantly insinuate things, and ask a question as some kind of set up to start laying down all these rehearsed arguments.Full of traps and set ups. What you did was incredibly elementary...full of elementary tactics, that I don't appreciate.God, what you did was incredibly self-important.This could of been something healthy, but it went left.

A lot of protesting IS attention-seeking...but doesn't mean it isn't well-deserved.

Gosh, I almost cut myself on that edge.

 

[ArabianLuffy]

I'm watching "Richard Spencer Speech at University of Florida". The audience (university students) look stupid. They kill any chance for debate, to clear misunderstanding thoughts between two groups. I feel a shamed to be born as a human. I wished I was a wolf.

 

[Goetia]

Nope,WRONG. And nope, WRONG again! And dumb dumb, you're comparing regular living to PROTESTING. That's another scale, you're actually putting yourself at an even bigger risk, by drawing that kind of attention to yourself. Screaming, holding signs, marching, etc....what are YOU talking about? And regardless if you're not screaming.

Nice try...very nice try.You're absolutely a liar. My reasoning is absolutely real.

The desperation is at an ALL TIME HIGH.

But there's nothing inherently wrong with protesting. The only people who would target you are people who want you silenced. They're the ones who are in the wrong, aren't they? You're distorting the meaning of protest to prove your flawed and immature point of view on a method of discourse.

 

[Fountain]

The whole point of protest is to show that you disagree with a particular thing.

You can disagree all you want without making a childish commotion over it.

But you'd rather that people suffer in silence on a particular issue?

Suffer in silence over what? They aren't being oppressed. Nobody is attacking them.

The first amendment of your own constitution protects the right to free speech, and you're telling me that they shouldn't be able to exercise that right?

You're the one doing that. In your first post you basically said when someone is preaching garbage their speech don't matter. Well... You didn't say that exactly but that's what it conveyed.

Your entire post is hypocrisy at its finest.

Oh please, don't try to switch it around.

 

[Dreckerplayer]

But there's nothing inherently wrong with protesting. The only people who would target you are people who want you silenced. They're the ones who are in the wrong, aren't they? You're distorting the meaning of protest to prove your flawed and immature point of view on a method of discourse.

Nope, nice try, again.

Dumb...