Which is currently worse at the moment:radical left or radical right?

[Luther]

You must be registered for see images

Post he calls me a troll.

You must be registered for see links

Wow, if this is what he actually views as trolling (and is not trolling himself), there's no hope for him as a human being.

You must be registered for see images

you stick your beliefs and i will stick to mine!

 

[Shadow Phantasm]

Bull. You are right wing conservative. Maybe blacks will get over slavery when a right wing conservative doesn't murder 9 black people in the church or when a white man or a white police officer isn't seen shooting a black man 8 times in the back despite him posing no threat to his life. You are ignorant not all muslims support violence i doubt not even up to half of half of the population which would be more than 250 million people and if you have hard concrete facts that goes against that notion i made, post them here!

Really?Because I've could've sworn I'm for liberal causes like gay marriage.

Or maybe you're so far to the extreme end of the left spectrum that everyone else is right by default?In which case the problem isn't me but you.

Btw,in that case you're likely referencing the black guy attacked the police officer who was justified in defending himself,you know...since we're talking about "facts" now.

If not all Muslims support violence then why is their goddamn religion the one that supports killing non believers?

Why is it that whenever someone makes a cartoon of their Prophet many of them flip the f*ck out and send death threats,or in Charlie Hebdo's case kill the cartoonists?

 

[Luther]

Really?Because I've could've sworn I'm for liberal causes like gay marriage.

Or maybe you're so far to the extreme end of the left spectrum that everyone else is right by default,in which case the problem isn't me but you.

Btw,in that case you're likely referencing the black guy attacked the police officer who was justified in defending himself,you know...since we're talking about "facts" now.

If not all Muslims support violence then why is their goddamn religion the one that supports killing non believers?

Why is it that whenever someone makes a cartoon of their Prophet they flip the f*ck out and send death threats,or in Charlie Hebdo's case kill the cartoonists?

Liberal but yet has never voted even once for obama! Dont make me laugh!

I guessed that is why the white police officer michael slager has been indicted on murder charges. Im done lol at least research the facts before you spew out nonsense.

 

[Sennin of Logic]

Liberal but yet has never voted even once for obama! Dont make me laugh!

I guessed that is why the white police officer michael slager has been indicted on murder charges. Im done lol at least research the facts before you spew out nonsense.

That last post though!

Anyway, after the "yet never voted for Obama post" makes it evident that you're trolling us.

 

[Shadow Phantasm]

Liberal but yet has never voted even once for obama! Dont make me laugh!

I guessed that is why the white police officer michael slager has been indicted on murder charges. Im done lol at least research the facts before you spew out nonsense.

My family did since I wasn't old enough to legally vote yet.

My mistake then,I thought you were talking about another case.

 

[SirCaedus]

The difference between the radical left and SJWs is clear as day.The latter identifies as social progressives while the other identifies as liberal.

This is like saying Tea Party supporters are Republicans,they may have joint interests but that's it.

The Civil War was started because the South wanted to secede from the Union,unlike the current story about it being due to slavery.Also it was Democrats or Dixiecrats that originally opposed the civil rights movement back then,which is something they don't teach you in history class.

If removing the Confederate flag is alright,then what's stopping people from removing parts of history?Once you start censoring things like that then it's a slippery slope.

Didn't those democrats switch to the republican party? Correct me if I am wrong.

 

[Shadow Phantasm]

Didn't those democrats switch to the republican party? Correct me if I am wrong.

Yes,and the republicans switched to the democrat party around that same time.

Political parties change all the time,so it's only natural for radicals to get power in a political group only for the pendulum to swing the other way at some later point.

Once extremist conservatives were/still hated,now it's the extremist left.

EDIT:Also contrary to popular belief it was the remnants of the Dixiecrat party that formed the KKK.

 

[CrimsonReaper]

I see.

You must be registered for see images

 

[Multiply]

Two words:Charlie Hebdo

The radical left all but cheered for the terrorists when the Charlie Hebdo killings happened,when's the last time any radical right winger expressed support for terrorism?

Or what about the radical left willing to turn the other way when a group of muslims were kidnapping and raping children in the UK?The police were afraid of investigating because they knew the radical left would decry them as being racist.

One event involving a possible radical right winger versus many that the radical left were behind or endorsed,we can play this game all day if you want.

Lol'd at Shadow actually believing this :lol.

 

[Shadow Phantasm]

Lol'd at Shadow actually believing this :lol.

Laugh all you want,but I saw more sympathy for the killers from the radical leftists than for the actual victims.

There was a lot of Anti West rhetoric being thrown around during that time as well.

 

[Multiply]

Laugh all you want,but I saw more sympathy for the killers from the radical leftists than for the actual victims.

There was a lot of Anti West rhetoric being thrown around during that time as well.

Where did you see more sympathy for the killers? Honestly? The closest thing I saw to 'sympathy' was people saying don't insult someone's religion and be surprised at how they react.

 

[Shadow Phantasm]

Where did you see more sympathy for the killers? Honestly? The closest thing I saw to 'sympathy' was people saying don't insult someone's religion and be surprised at how they react.

"This wouldn't have happened if the cartoonists didn't make a drawing of Muhammad."

This and that other statement along with the anti western rhetoric shows the radical left sympathizes with Islamic terrorists.

And it's funny how you never hear Christians getting up in arms when people make fun of Jesus or God,I wonder why?

If they can handle having their religious icons made fun of,what's the radical Islamists and their sympathizers excuse?

 

[Multiply]

"This wouldn't have happened if the cartoonists didn't make a drawing of Muhammad."

This and that other statement along with the anti western rhetoric shows the radical left sympathizes with Islamic terrorists.

And it's funny how you never hear Christians getting up in arms when people make fun of Jesus or God,I wonder why?

If they can handle having their religious icons made fun of,what's the radical Islamists and their sympathizers excuse?

@Bold is a fact. Drawing Muhammad is extremely against their faith. It's not even radical left logic, that's modern day human logic. To not expect a response would be more surprising to me in that region of the world. It's like crawling inside the lions den and waving a juicy steak in front of its mouth, then being angry when it bites your arm off.

I'm not saying the terrorists were right, because they were obviously wrong in taking lives. However, that does not release Mr. Hebdo from some of the blame. He knew exactly what he was doing because I'm pretty sure he has taken flack for that kind of action before.


Why are you comparing Islam and Christianity? They have different beliefs. You're comparing an apple to an orange.

 

[Shadow Phantasm]

@Bold is a fact. Drawing Muhammad is extremely against their faith. It's not even radical left logic, that's modern day human logic. To not expect a response would be more surprising to me in that region of the world. It's like crawling inside the lions den and waving a juicy steak in front of its mouth, then being angry when it bites your arm off.

I'm not saying the terrorists were right, because they were obviously wrong in taking lives. However, that does not release Mr. Hebdo from some of the blame. He knew exactly what he was doing because I'm pretty sure he has taken flack for that kind of action before.


Why are you comparing Islam and Christianity? They have different beliefs. You're comparing an apple to an orange.

The fact that a drawing causes such a response is the problem,along with the people who excuse and defend that behavior.

You never see Christians threatening to kill Seth MacFarland for using Jesus and God in his shows skits,yet the creators of South Park got threats daily for having Muhammad in their show.

I compare the two because both religions have the same origin,except one has evolved with the times while the other is completely barbaric.

 

[paratise]

Two words:Charlie Hebdo

The radical left all but cheered for the terrorists when the Charlie Hebdo killings happened,when's the last time any radical right winger expressed support for terrorism?

Or what about the radical left willing to turn the other way when a group of muslims were kidnapping and raping children in the UK?The police were afraid of investigating because they knew the radical left would decry them as being racist.

One event involving a possible radical right winger versus many that the radical left were behind or endorsed,we can play this game all day if you want.

See that is the problem; you do not judge how people act themselves you judge how people react to others' acts.

I am asking you this; were the people who attacked Charlie Hebdo extreme leftists? No if anything they would be defined ask extreme right wings and that is how they would define themselves between two sides. (I am saying this based on personal experience by living in a country where most people are Muslims, unlike you who base your arguements off tumblr and likely Fox News). Most if not all radical Muslims i know are of the far right side.

If you equate death of 9 people to some tumblr teens' reactions and campus liberalism i feel sorry for your humanity. It is not about quantity of examples it is about their contexts.

One word:Anders Behring Breivik!

Those are 3 words.

As for your rep i do not know what made you think i am white. I am Caucasian

Ooh,I'm so scared.

Unless you're a mod I don't think your authority means jack shit here in my thread.

Oh and the whites that enslaved black people have long been dead,get the hell over it already because pretty much every group has been oppressed throughout history.

If blaming white people for shit they weren't alive to do is fine,then it's fine to blame the group whose religion preaches hate and killing non believers for what the radical groups like ISIS are doing.

Unless you're a f*cking hypocrite of course,which again is a trait among radical leftists.

@bold religion preached hate? Now you show your Islamophobic side? Disgusting. ISIS happens to kill Muslims for the most part.

"We must protect the right to marriage!" "We must remove the right to guns!" Lol!, How does this follow again?

How is legal union between a couple equates a tool with sole purpose of killing? How does this follow?

Really?Because I've could've sworn I'm for liberal causes like gay marriage.

Or maybe you're so far to the extreme end of the left spectrum that everyone else is right by default?In which case the problem isn't me but you.

Btw,in that case you're likely referencing the black guy attacked the police officer who was justified in defending himself,you know...since we're talking about "facts" now.

If not all Muslims support violence then why is their goddamn religion the one that supports killing non believers?

Why is it that whenever someone makes a cartoon of their Prophet many of them flip the f*ck out and send death threats,or in Charlie Hebdo's case kill the cartoonists?

If all Muslims supported violence your country and everyone's country would be ****ed over more than 5 times.

The fact that a drawing causes such a response is the problem,along with the people who excuse and defend that behavior.

You never see Christians threatening to kill Seth MacFarland for using Jesus and God in his shows skits,yet the creators of South Park got threats daily for having Muhammad in their show.

I compare the two because both religions have the same origin,except one has evolved with the times while the other is completely barbaric.

@bold i can throw up.

Each religion has different sensitive points.

Christians in fact go around murder people of different faith because USA's boots are stepped on 'barbaric' lands to get rid of them savages; millions of people in middle east died or had to leave their home. Btw everyone and their dogs know terrorist organisations like Taliban, Al-Qaeda, ISIS got supported by USA. Heck Taliban means "student" and they were trained by US troops to attack Russia during Cold War.

 

[Multiply]

The fact that a drawing causes such a response is the problem,along with the people who excuse and defend that behavior.

You never see Christians threatening to kill Seth MacFarland for using Jesus and God in his shows skits,yet the creators of South Park got threats daily for having Muhammad in their show.

I compare the two because both religions have the same origin,except one has evolved with the times while the other is completely barbaric.

Because it's not against their beliefs to portray Jesus or God. It is against the beliefs of Islam to portray Muhammad. Like I said, you're comparing to different beliefs, regardless of origin.

All I'm saying is, in terms of the Hebdo attacks, don't do something that threatens someone's faith, then be surprised at how they react.

 

[Sennin of Logic]

How is legal union between a couple equates a tool with sole purpose of killing? How does this follow?

Both are rights, that's how they follow. My point it's protecting that it's rights for a group of people on one hand, and ripping the rights of everyone just because they don't appreciate that right, and making the decision for everyone else.

 

[Shadow Phantasm]

See that is the problem; you do not judge how people act themselves you judge how people react to others' acts.

I am asking you this; were the people who attacked Charlie Hebdo extreme leftists? No if anything they would be defined ask extreme right wings and that is how they would define themselves between two sides. (I am saying this based on personal experience by living in a country where most people are Muslims, unlike you who base your arguements off tumblr and likely Fox News). Most if not all radical Muslims i know are of the far right side.

If you equate death of 9 people to some tumblr teens' reactions and campus liberalism i feel sorry for your humanity. It is not about quantity of examples it is about their contexts.


Those are 3 words.

As for your rep i do not know what made you think i am white. I am Caucasian


@bold religion preached hate? Now you show your Islamophobic side? Disgusting. ISIS happens to kill Muslims for the most part.

How is legal union between a couple equates a tool with sole purpose of killing? How does this follow?

If all Muslims supported violence your country and everyone's country would be ****ed over more than 5 times.

@bold i can throw up.

Each religion has different sensitive points.

Christians in fact go around murder people of different faith because USA's boots are stepped on 'barbaric' lands to get rid of them savages; millions of people in middle east died or had to leave their home. Btw everyone and their dogs know terrorist organisations like Taliban, Al-Qaeda, ISIS got supported by USA. Heck Taliban means "student" and they were trained by US troops to attack Russia during Cold War.

Islam pretty much states that any non believer,homosexual,women who partake in lust should be put to death.

Have you seen what happens to women and gay people over in Islamic states?

Calling me a Islamophobe does not change the fact that the "Religion of Peace" is anything but.

Also if it weren't for several interests and our troops still deployed there the U.S would've bombed those barbarians to hell.

Me?I'm more content on pulling out and letting them kill each other.So that's a pretty good joke you told there.

 

[Multiply]

Islam pretty much states that any non believer,homosexual,women who partake in lust should be put to death.

Have you seen what happens to women and gay people over in Islamic states?

Calling me a Islamophobe does not change the fact that the "Religion of Peace" is anything but.

Also if it weren't for several interests and our troops still deployed there the U.S would've bombed those barbarians to hell.

Me?I'm more content on pulling out and letting them kill each other.So that's a pretty good joke you told there.

@Bold, some followers of Christianity believe homosexuals are hated by God. Your bible states that slavery is fine. Your bible holds the belief that women are subservient. Anyone who goes against the above are not loved by God and are not granted a place in heaven. :lol.

What say you to that?

 

[Shadow Phantasm]

@Bold, some followers of Christianity believe homosexuals are hated by God. Your bible states that slavery is fine. Your bible holds the belief that women are subservient. Anyone who goes against the above are not loved by God and are not granted a place in heaven. :lol.

What say you to that?

Implying I'm religious.

Implying that I don't know that the Bible has some messed up things in it.

My answer?Apparently criticizing Islam struck a nerve with you,then again criticizing a barbaric religion is bad according to the people that wants to bow down to almighty Islam.