What would an all good person be?
- Thread starter Chikombo
- Start date
Yeah right
Active member
A good person should look a lot like me. I’m the definition of it. I’m all the illustration of it.
A good person would never have blood on his hands. Unless he nose bled.
A good person would never have blood on his hands. Unless he nose bled.
Yeah right
Active member
If you promise to spread my name around for clients, I’ll make a free website for you.
Why would you need bad people? We already have plenty of those and you can see how messed up the world is. If you're saying everything would fall apart because it would be boring. You can still have fun and be a good person. Fun doesn't have to involve hurting, bullying or preying on others, taking advantage of other people etc. that stuff only pulls people apart and builds up hate.
It may be an impossibility, but if everyone respected eachother and treated eachother better we would accomplish more and the world would be a better place.
Onii Chan
Active member
Awards
You're a good person? You literally admitted in another thread not too long ago that you agree that a parent can kill their child... You make me so mad i swear... sitting there and saying you're a good person pisses me off so much if there wasn't a computer and internet between us i'd punch you into oblivion.
HowDidIGetPrem
Active member
Awards
Yes. A good person should be able to kill the Devil and get blood on their hands. Being good doesn't mean they have to strip away their ability of reasoning. A good person would realize that letting a mass murder continue to murder many more is objectively worse than the murderer himself dying. In fact, I think a good person should have extremely strong objective reasoning if he's running around with these kinds of capabilities.
This. A good person should look a lot like future me, and if future me isn't a good person I'll take that to mean a good person has to have limits. What use is being good if you give your all to one and have none left for the rest or yourself? An all-good person has to know their limits and judge everyone around them appropriately. They're bound to make errors and be flawed to some extent.
Yeah right
Active member
jimbobbity
Active member
There is Good... and then there is Stupid.
If it is the intent of myself to harm someone who has no intention of committing harm on others, and whose actions do not pose a threat to those around them - then would it be good to allow me to do so?
Good people have, in general, sought out methods to be able to stop such individuals while not killing them - as good people recognize that a person can commit an evil act without, themselves, being evil. Even those who, at one point in time, can be fully intent on harming another person, can realize another way of life and reject such feelings or actions in the future.
It is this belief that others can be good that defines good, itself. It is the desire to see all things live to realize a greater purpose. However, we have limits to our abilities. Sometimes, the force necessary to stop someone intent on harming society will put an end to their life. Sometimes, a person is so set into their ways of causing harm to others, that death is the only recourse.
"If Man is not judged by their choices, the how are we really deciding who is good, and who is evil?"
"But how can our souls be precious if they are not utilized? If we base our lives on the Sibyl's oracle and not our own free will, then can our souls have value?"
Yeah right
Active member
I have to praise you for using contemporary material to reinforce your points.
Last edited: