Seriously, no disrespect. But... I can't say anything without calling you out. I want you to think really hard and see if what you said makes any sense at all. Stop with children being pure. They know less but that doesn't mean they need to be sheltered. It's the job of the parent to talk with their children if they have questions. What show are they watching where they would think bad of their own parents. They are just being exposed to another lifestyle.
How are those parents suppose to teach their kids the right thing when they grew up in a time where you can practically get killed for being gay? Them parents grew up in a time where they went to church almost 2 to 3 times per week. You can't expect to tell a parent that they're teaching their kid the wrong thing when they grew up their whole life believing that homosexuality is wrong.
At this point, you're flat out telling them that their belief is wrong despite what their grandparents and parents before them believed in.
This ain't simple at all!
Again, unless the world is ready to reject the idea of "God is everything", This will continue to be a problem for the next 20 years at least.
Here is what they should say when on the day their child is viewing a "gay" show.
"Listen close child. Those people are what they call homosexuals. They think they have the right to marry each other. By that I mean, a man wants to spend the rest of their life with another man."
Child, "you mean like my best friend johnny and me"
Parent. " well... since you are only 6, you might not understand what marrying means. When a man and woman marry, they get to have children. Two men and two women can't naturally. I think you might be too young to understand what being gay means because I don't feel comfortable talking about *** with you at your age. Just know that gay people exist.
Child "are you gay?"
Parent " no. Actually I think being gay is wrong because my parents told me it was wrong. And this book that I was told to read says it's wrong. But it's out there. It's up to you to decide if you think it's wrong. I want you to decide. Even though I think it's wrong, it doesn't mean you have to think it's wrong. Kinda like how I say you have to sleep at 9 pm. You think it's wrong even though I think it's right.
Without sources don't profession drop.Exposing it to children at such a young age will have devastating effects on society in the future I believe and so do many professors of psychology. You might say well what about all the "straight propoganda" and I would say sure some people enjoy *** but it goes deeper than just pleasure it's for the progression of the species and not ones selfish indulgences. That is part of the reason why Trump won people are waking up to this for good reason.
Homosexuality happens in Nature, okay. Is it beneficial to the progression of the human species? Absolutely not. That's all you need to know. I believe 100% of people have gotten homosexual tendencies at one point or another but 1% act out on it and they pay the price in many ways. Why do 1% act out on it? Several reasons. Child molestation, childhood emotional neglect and in some cases porn can influence ones decision. They expect validation specifically for the act itself which they won't get cause no one relates to someones *** life when they don't contribute to the progression of the species. This makes them resentful to "straight people" which is why 60% of serial killers are homosexual, others go shoot up nightclubs and many commit suicide. You go against anything that is beneficial to the human species you will pay the price. And letting these SJW's invade our schools and teaching this shit too our children will have devastating concequences mark my words.
Without sources don't profession drop.
I have a BS is psychology. I have read papers that go against your claim. I can't give citations either but don't throw in that psychologist all agree.
Everything you are saying are just as bad as the leftists spout.
I argued with just having a discussion with a child. There is no harmful effects with informing.
I thought trump one because blue collar workers being tired of their job opportunities being thrown out.
Dawg, all this is is you repeating "Homosexuality isn't right and normal" over and over.
1. In what way is homosexuality not normal? Does that way inherently mean wrong?
2. Why is homosexuality not acceptable?
3. What chaos does it bring that's inherent to homosexuality and can't be found in heterosexuality?
4. Why is it okay to show children heterosexual feelings and acts, but not homosexual feelings and acts of the same level?
5. How does homosexuality make the world worse?
You gotta answer these questions if you wanna actually argue your point. Saying "No it's wrong" over and over is just immature and childish, and shows you have no real rhyme or reasoning behind your homo/transphobia.
if homosexuality was "normal" it wouldn't be such a small portion of the population. Dwarves aren't normal either
Normal-"conforming to a standard; usual, typical, or expected."
homosexuality is by definition not normal. If it was it would occur in the majority of the population.
Which is why I asked in what way he means normal. That is one meaning of normal, normal can also mean the opposite of dysfunction. Homosexuality isn't dysfunctional.
Normal can also mean natural, which homosexuality is. You say homosexuality isn't normal because it's such a small portion of the population. Well, only 2% of people have green eyes, but you wouldn't say it's not normal for a person to have green eyes
At the end of the day, the whole "Homosexuality isn't normal" argument just boils down to a game of semantics, and doesn't actually get your viewpoint any traction.
In relation to the progress of the species it is 100% dysfunctional.
That is not what dysfunction means though, in the context of human cognition, sexuality, and psychology.
Not only that, but there is argument that homosexuality benefits humanity as a species because a species that survives and reproduces too well can end up killing itself off through overpopulation. A species can literally go extinct from accomplishing that goal too well.
There is also the fact that homosexual people can still reproduce through artificial insemination, so that argument goes out the window as well.
I personally don't care what another persons sexuality/gender identification is, just don't impose that shit on me or my family and we are good.
As far as exposing this to kids, I think that we don't need to oversaturate people with the whole "LGBT" ideal, other than just telling children to not judge someone for their sexual preference.
Which is why I asked in what way he means normal. That is one meaning of normal, normal can also mean the opposite of dysfunction. Homosexuality isn't dysfunctional.
Normal can also mean natural, which homosexuality is. You say homosexuality isn't normal because it's such a small portion of the population. Well, only 2% of people have green eyes, but you wouldn't say it's not normal for a person to have green eyes
At the end of the day, the whole "Homosexuality isn't normal" argument just boils down to a game of semantics, and doesn't actually get your viewpoint any traction.